How to describe publications in AACOMAS

[exmoderpina]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Hi SDN friends,

So I have a few first author publications and I am not exactly sure what is the correct way to go about describing them. With the limit being only 750 characters, I figured that including a citations and online link to the papers is important, but I am not sure how to use the rest of my space. For now, I have included what can be called the "procedure" of how I did my research but I did not talk about the hypothesis/conclusion for my works since I figured that if ADCOMS really care (not sure they do when processing 3000+ apps) about the "significance" they can just c+p the link into their browsers and read the abstracts. It has been very difficult to try to cohesively combine both the "procedure" and "conclusion", so I am wondering if any of you have suggestions....

Thank you! 🙂

 

[AlteredScale]

I'd say give a brief discussion of the project followed with a link to the journal. If the AdComs want to know more about what the project was then they can read it up themselves.

Hope that helps! 🙂

 

[IslandStyle808]

I agree with above. I would also include what you have learned from the experience also. Just put the doi number as a citation, they can find it on pubmed.

EDIT: there was also a small discussion about it on this thread

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/abstracts-and-papers-in-application.1093653/

 

[uvrsol]

separate Research from Publication. In research activity, explain everything that you did. In awards section or another EC section, put publication and cite it.

 

[exmoderpina]

separate Research from Publication. In research activity, explain everything that you did. In awards section or another EC section, put publication and cite it.

Excellent suggestion! Thank you! 🙂