Ruban said:
Clearly, there are many other factors other than ranking to consider when applying to a residency program, but there surely is a difference between a #1 ranked residency and a #200 ranked residency. Is there any "objective" ranking source that is the equivalent of the US News ranking system for colleges available for residency programs?
Thanks!
I applied for IM this year, so I can't really speak for other specialites. At least for IM, there is no good objective source of information. It's one of the most frustrating things about the whole process. Some use NIH funding as a measure of prestige, but then that's dependent upon how much research is done. Even US News has a "best hospitals" thing, but that has its faults as well.
What my PD told me was that (at least for IM), once you're in the top 40 programs in the country, there's not vast gulfs between them--in fact, most programs will have more than you can take in in three years. So he said to look at locations, interview, and get a feel for the residents--like are those folks the type of people you want to work and train with. Prestige does you well for fellowship placement, so if you're subspecialty bound, make sure to apply where your fellowship is strong.
As for picking where to apply, it's a crap shoot. All you have is subjective information--SDN, scutwork.com, recommendations from previous applicants, your PD, etc. Amalgamate those subjective recommendations into a working list, and then just see who wants to interview you.
Sorry for the vague response, but I have found no good objective comparison for something that I am only now realizing is a completely subjective experience.
Best of luck!
DS