How to use FA for Step 2CS?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

WashMe

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2008
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
72
I tried the search function, I don't see a dedicated thread... so I'll ask herein.

How do you guys recommend using FA for Step 2CS? I feel like I have no problem asking the right questions and reaching the actual diagnosis, but "expanding" (i.e. bullsh*tting) the ddx and coming up with the "next steps" is really hard...

The first issue is in purposely finding wrong answers to fill in my differential (FA is a perfect example for this; it will describe temporal arteritis perfectly, then put something that doesn't fit well at all -- like trigeminal neuralgia -- in the differential).

The second issue, and the more difficult one, is deciding what tests/imaging to order. For instance, FA says that carotid dopplers should be done on the temporal arteritis patient, but I assume this is only b/c carotid dissection is ALSO on the differential. I already KNOW trigeminal neuralgia and carotid dissection don't fit the clinical picture, so I don't feel right ordering superfluous tests to evalutate them in my 2CS workup.

If you follow FA, every patient with a headache should have a CT or MRI, ESR, and often an LP. I find this to be ******ed.

Overall, my questions are:
(1) do you have any suggestions on how to actually get meaningful information from FA for 2CS?
(2) how do I decide what to order, in light of ******edly expanded differentials (required by 2CS) that are almost not certainly consistent with the complete clinical picture?

Thanks!
 
I know you guys also use this book and it's clear that it sucks. Someone please chime in!
 
Don't over think it. Yes ordering some of the superfluous tests is annoying. Deal with it and put it in because the bulk of the exams difficulty is in the patient interactions.
 
Top