How to write a Personal Statement

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DrSmooth

Secret Recipe Soda
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
1) Do not read any advice about how to write a personal statement until after you are finished writing and editing your personal statement.

2) Write 2-3 separate personal statement rough drafts and pick the one you/others think is strongest.

3) Edit and re-edit until you think it is perfect.

4) Read credible advice on what to do and not do in a PS and make necessary changes.

5) Send to sharp, honest, editorially-skilled friends and strangers to edit sequentially (i.e. send and make changes, send again and make changes, etc.).

6) Complete final draft.

7) Submit.
 
Yeah, wasn't sure which forum was more appropriate. Hopefully it can be moved if necessary. I tried to hit more on process than form and content which I think the other two posts address extensively. I think it works better to draft a PS before looking at how-to's (and definitely before looking at anyone else's PS) so you can be somewhat unique, and distinct from the 90% of people who read all the same how to's before writing theirs.
 
Make sure yo have the PS readers read it and critique it!
 
1) Do not read any advice about how to write a personal statement until after you are finished writing and editing your personal statement.

2) Write 2-3 separate personal statement rough drafts and pick the one you/others think is strongest.

3) Edit and re-edit until you think it is perfect.

4) Read credible advice on what to do and not do in a PS and make necessary changes.

5) Send to sharp, honest, editorially-skilled friends and strangers to edit sequentially (i.e. send and make changes, send again and make changes, etc.).

6) Complete final draft.

7) Submit.

Have you written a PS? And submitted it, and had a successful cycle?

This sounds like the advice of someone who has never written a PS, especially nos 1 and 2...why do you list #4 as an "after the fact" thing to do - to get advice on how to write a PS after you have spun your wheels?

Most people have no idea what the goal of the PS is in the first place. It is very important to understand what the PS should convey, and what should be left out.

As for #2: writing multiple PS rough drafts at one time is simply not realistic. It is hard enough coming up with one concept, much less writing three different ones at one time and then picking the winner.
 
Most people have no idea what the goal of the PS is in the first place. It is very important to understand what the PS should convey, and what should be left out.

As for #2: writing multiple PS rough drafts at one time is simply not realistic. It is hard enough coming up with one concept, much less writing three different ones at one time and then picking the winner.

I really agree with this part. I think that everyone has their own approach, and perhaps the outlined approach worked well for the OP. For me, however, I also found it much easier to figure out what the point of the PS was, go over a few common pitfalls, outline my concept, refine a bit, then send sequentially for brutally/beautifully honest feedback that helped strengthen the essay. You certainly may have to scrap your first idea and move on to another, but you'll probably learn something important that you'll be able to use in PS #2.
 
I really agree with this part. I think that everyone has their own approach, and perhaps the outlined approach worked well for the OP. For me, however, I also found it much easier to figure out what the point of the PS was, go over a few common pitfalls, outline my concept, refine a bit, then send sequentially for brutally/beautifully honest feedback that helped strengthen the essay. You certainly may have to scrap your first idea and move on to another, but you'll probably learn something important that you'll be able to use in PS #2.

I think that sums up the most realistic approach - you may end up scrapping your first idea, but this is simply the process of an evolving PS. Your end result may look very little like your first effort, but it is really hard if not completely unrealistic for someone to start the process with multiple rough drafts.

And I don't think that anybody should start the PS process without having a good idea of what the PS is intended to accomplish. IIRC, the AMCAS/AAMC website is a very good place to start...

I also think that reading successful PS statements from others offers valuable insights - I have never understood why people say not to read any of them prior to starting your own PS - I found it very instructive, although I will say that the well known book of med school essays available everywhere is horrible - I did not think that ANY of those essays were any good. I asked friends, and some generous folks on SDN, if I could read their PS...you see what works, what doesn't, and you quickly learn the focus and "rhythm" of a well written PS.
 
As a PS reader I'm seeing a lot of essays that don't specifically address (sufficiently, at least) the "why" one wants to be a doctor question.

My opinion is people just need to put more thought into these than they realize. The better you understand your motivations the better you will be at articulating them. It will come out in your writing.
 
I wrote mine over a 3 month period and had over 50 major revisions before I was comfortable with it. Time consuming, yes. But it has been very successful!
 
1) Do not read any advice about how to write a personal statement until after you are finished writing and editing your personal statement.

Hmm...so what are you supposed to do when the first piece of advice for writing a personal statement tells you to not read any advice for writing a personal statement? 😛

As for #2: writing multiple PS rough drafts at one time is simply not realistic. It is hard enough coming up with one concept, much less writing three different ones at one time and then picking the winner.

I think it really just depends on how you write and what part of the process you're getting stuck at. I personally had a lot of little stories that I wanted to tell about my motivations for going into medicine and was having a hard time putting them into a cohesive personal statement. Writing drafts with different approaches (chronological, patient-themed, personal interest-themed) with some major parts copied on each helped me see what worked and what didn't

But yeah, in the same way that it's a "personal" statement, it's also a "personal" writing experience, so different approaches will work for different people.

My opinion is people just need to put more thought into these than they realize. The better you understand your motivations the better you will be at articulating them. It will come out in your writing.

I totally agree with this. I think the best advice I can give to younger pre-meds is to honestly evaluate what aspects of each experience (whether it's volunteering, clinical stuff, research, or really any activity that you're involved in) you really enjoy and what aspects you don't enjoy and to do this evaluation as you're actually doing these activities, not just when it's time to come up with a personal statement.

I think too often, many pre-meds fall into the trap of doing things in the following order: (1) deciding that they're "pre-med," (2) doing a bunch of activities/ECs in order to prove to medical schools that they want to be a doctor, and then (3) sitting down to write a personal statement and for the first time, truly contemplating if/why medicine is for them.

When really, the process should be more like (1) do a bunch of activities to see if medicine interests you, (2) reflect on those activities and contemplate if/why medicine is for you, and then (3) decide to be a doctor. My guess is that the people who follow this second approach probably have a much easier time coming up with things to talk about for their personal statement.
 
Have you written a PS? And submitted it, and had a successful cycle?

This sounds like the advice of someone who has never written a PS, especially nos 1 and 2...why do you list #4 as an "after the fact" thing to do - to get advice on how to write a PS after you have spun your wheels?

Most people have no idea what the goal of the PS is in the first place. It is very important to understand what the PS should convey, and what should be left out.

As for #2: writing multiple PS rough drafts at one time is simply not realistic. It is hard enough coming up with one concept, much less writing three different ones at one time and then picking the winner.

This was a process I developed that worked well for me (it helped me put together something I will be proud of for the rest of my life) and I posted it because I think it will be helpful for others. You might not see value in my process, but seriously, no need for an ad hominem attack. Whether or not I have ever written or submitted a PS or been "accepted - class of 2014", has no bearing on the usefulness of my process. But if it helps you consider what I have to say, I worked writing speeches and curriculum for 10 years before pursuing a career in medicine. I wrote and submitted a PS using this process and I suppose I've had a "successful cycle", whatever the he77 that is. I received 12 interview invites with all acceptances and 1 WL so far (though that could have nothing to do with my PS). A few interviewers said it was the best or one of the best (although a lot of applicants hear this so you have to wonder) PS they had ever read.

As for the rationale behind the process:

#1) As I stated previously in other words, if you follow a formula your PS will be formulaic. You can read the how to posts and write a strong PS. But I want more than a strong PS. I want a grab you by the ba77s PS that is 1 in 1000. To achieve that I think you need to strike out on your own and not be influenced by other people's advice, especially the same advice that 1000s of other premeds are reading before they write their PS. Also, there are no hard and fast rules about what (or how) a PS "should" address, as long as you give a transparent, personal, and moving response to the prompt.

#2) Judging from my own and bobsmith's experience it is realistic to write multiple separate drafts. But why should you? For me, I know that when I sit down to write something this important, the first things that come out are total CRAP-- grandiose, impersonal, cliche, etc. Is that really what you want to start editing, building your entire PS on a foundation of CRAP? Not me. So multiple separate drafts hopefully gets the crap out of your system early on. It also lets you play with format and style, like bobsmith said, to find what most effectively communicates your message. Again, these are stream of contentiousness drafts, maybe even outlines. They shouldn't take more than an hour or two each, and you probably only need a few. Also, you mentioned not wanting to spin your wheels. But playing around with this thing or "spinning your wheels" is really important. Your Personal Statement should be profoundly "personal". That level of introspection, for most people, requires multiple passes and perspectives over a pretty long time period.

#4) The how-to content advice posts (like deepakote's) are indispensable, but are most useful after you have finished writing and editing your PS, for the reasons I have already mentioned. And come on, if you don't have a general sense of what a PS is about, especially after reading the question prompt, you might consider going into a different profession. As far as not reading other people's PS before writing your own, this should be a no brainer. Why would you straitjacket yourself by reading someone else's PS before you sit down to write your own. The more PSs you read, the more generic yours is likely to become.

Again, I am just putting my process out there and hope people find it helpful. The more thought and time you can put into writing a kick ***** PS the better. Good Luck!


And I agree with everything bobsmith said.
 
I think 1 is the strongest piece of advice. Write whatever you think a PS should be. Then, look at how yours differs. And see where to go from there.

Reading others inhibits your ability to think out of the box.


2 on the other hand is not a good piece of advice.

Brainstorming or free writing should be used to create one long story.
Then you start to identify your main theme.
Then you start to slice up stuff and reattach them appropriately if needed.
 
This was a process I developed that worked well for me (it helped me put together something I will be proud of for the rest of my life) and I posted it because I think it will be helpful for others. You might not see value in my process, but seriously, no need for an ad hominem attack. Whether or not I have ever written or submitted a PS or been "accepted - class of 2014", has no bearing on the usefulness of my process. But if it helps you consider what I have to say, I worked writing speeches and curriculum for 10 years before pursuing a career in medicine. I wrote and submitted a PS using this process and I suppose I've had a "successful cycle", whatever the he77 that is. I received 12 interview invites with all acceptances and 1 WL so far (though that could have nothing to do with my PS). A few interviewers said it was the best or one of the best (although a lot of applicants hear this so you have to wonder) PS they had ever read.

As for the rationale behind the process:

#1) As I stated previously in other words, if you follow a formula your PS will be formulaic. You can read the how to posts and write a strong PS. But I want more than a strong PS. I want a grab you by the ba77s PS that is 1 in 1000. To achieve that I think you need to strike out on your own and not be influenced by other people's advice, especially the same advice that 1000s of other premeds are reading before they write their PS. Also, there are no hard and fast rules about what (or how) a PS "should" address, as long as you give a transparent, personal, and moving response to the prompt.

#2) Judging from my own and bobsmith's experience it is realistic to write multiple separate drafts. But why should you? For me, I know that when I sit down to write something this important, the first things that come out are total CRAP-- grandiose, impersonal, cliche, etc. Is that really what you want to start editing, building your entire PS on a foundation of CRAP? Not me. So multiple separate drafts hopefully gets the crap out of your system early on. It also lets you play with format and style, like bobsmith said, to find what most effectively communicates your message. Again, these are stream of contentiousness drafts, maybe even outlines. They shouldn't take more than an hour or two each, and you probably only need a few. Also, you mentioned not wanting to spin your wheels. But playing around with this thing or "spinning your wheels" is really important. Your Personal Statement should be profoundly "personal". That level of introspection, for most people, requires multiple passes and perspectives over a pretty long time period.

#4) The how-to content advice posts (like deepakote's) are indispensable, but are most useful after you have finished writing and editing your PS, for the reasons I have already mentioned. And come on, if you don't have a general sense of what a PS is about, especially after reading the question prompt, you might consider going into a different profession. As far as not reading other people's PS before writing your own, this should be a no brainer. Why would you straitjacket yourself by reading someone else's PS before you sit down to write your own. The more PSs you read, the more generic yours is likely to become.

Again, I am just putting my process out there and hope people find it helpful. The more thought and time you can put into writing a kick ***** PS the better. Good Luck!


And I agree with everything bobsmith said.

Really? Cuz bobsmith doesn't agree with everything you wrote...especially on the bad advice you give about not reading other PSs and not really understanding the purpose of the PS prior to starting one.

You make some broad statements that are total BS, such as "the more Pss you read, the more generic yours is likely to become." Do you give the same advice to novelists, speech writers, etc? Really? Don't read and you will be a better writer? Do you really believe that reading examples of others' writing will dull your senses and negatively impact your own writing?

This is my advice, take it or leave it: The more PSs you read, the more you will see that the vast majority of them are pretty bad, or at least they are mediocre, or perfunctory. I find that insight alone to be instructive, but what is really helpful is to read a really well written PS, then to analyze it and understand what made it special, and apply those principles to your own writing.

Most pre meds do not have an extensive background in speechwriting, etc., as you claim to have. Perhaps if your original post had included the details you have written here - a "this is who I am - my background in writing - and this is the way I approached writing a PS" - your advice would not have fallen with such a thud.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I'm not a fan of this 7 step program at all, especially the multiple drafts and not reading others' work parts. I think bob and flip have this under control. Incidentally, there's already quite a lot of good advice on writing personal statements in the stickied threads at the top of this forum, so those of you who are looking for strategies and other help should go there.
 
Really? Cuz bobsmith doesn't agree with everything you wrote...especially on the bad advice you give about not reading other PSs and not really understanding the purpose of the PS prior to starting one.

You make some broad statements that are total BS, such as "the more Pss you read, the more generic yours is likely to become." Do you give the same advice to novelists, speech writers, etc? Really? Don't read and you will be a better writer? Do you really believe that reading examples of others' writing will dull your senses and negatively impact your own writing?

This is my advice, take it or leave it: The more PSs you read, the more you will see that the vast majority of them are pretty bad, or at least they are mediocre, or perfunctory. I find that insight alone to be instructive, but what is really helpful is to read a really well written PS, then to analyze it and understand what made it special, and apply those principles to your own writing.

Most pre meds do not have an extensive background in speechwriting, etc., as you claim to have. Perhaps if your original post had included the details you have written here - a "this is who I am - my background in writing - and this is the way I approached writing a PS" - your advice would not have fallen with such a thud.

Wow. Ever consider rads?
 
Wow. I love how SDN can make a simple discussion turn into an intense war scene.
 
Top