- Joined
- Aug 23, 2016
- Messages
- 1,490
- Reaction score
- 3,289
- Points
- 5,706
- Medical Student (Accepted)
apparently this has been posted many times before 😳
Last edited:
Thank you for this enlightening article that hasn't been posted on SDN even once in the six years since it was published.This just goes to show how many people make claims without actually researching anything about them. If you would like a good laugh, take a look at this article. I can't believe Forbes would actually allow something so biased and inaccurate to be published. Oh well, I'm still excited to learn some pseudoscience next year!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/sciencebiz/2010/10/27/osteopaths-versus-doctors/2/#dfd6c1b83069
Thank you for this enlightening article that hasn't been posted on SDN even once in the six years since it was published.
![]()
No need for apologies, I'm just busting your stones 😛haha sorry wasn't aware. I'll delete it.
It's nice to see that he partially came to his senses, but he's still incorrect about using the term "allopath/allopathic physician" for MD's.http://www.forbes.com/sites/science...houghts-on-osteopathic-medicine/#7dc30e645e21
After the influx of comments on the first article.
This f*cking guy. Why do they let reporters write on things when they don't know what they're talking about?
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
I don't even think US news ranking credibility is that trustworthy anymore. Maybe not the list of riches people in the US lolI thought the same thing when I read it. Completely ruins his credibility and even assists in ruining Forbe's credibility. Not to mention the only data he was concerned about was US news rankings....lol
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile