IBR and loan forgiveness

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Belleza156

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
383
Reaction score
8
Any residents currently paying back their student loans in residency?

I am thinking of taking advantage of the IBR during residency so I'd only have 7 years left working at a qualifying hospital (assuming this works out), once I get done with residency and then I'd take advantage of the public service loan forgiveness and have $100K forgiven of my loans.

I just started researching into the different payment options and on paper it seems like a decent deal if it goes through. Has anyone had any experience with this?
 
Any residents currently paying back their student loans in residency?

I am thinking of taking advantage of the IBR during residency so I'd only have 7 years left working at a qualifying hospital (assuming this works out), once I get done with residency and then I'd take advantage of the public service loan forgiveness and have $100K forgiven of my loans.

I just started researching into the different payment options and on paper it seems like a decent deal if it goes through. Has anyone had any experience with this?

Working at this "qualifying hospital," would you be a partner/employee of a physician group or cmg?
 
As far as I understand I wouldn't be able to be a part of a physician group for those 7 years. Id have to be directly employed by the hospital or it doesnt qualify as a tax exempt organization under 501 (c)(3) which then means the loans wouldn't be forgiven.
 
Unless you are going to do academics anyway, the program likely won't work out in your favor.
Taking an academic job for 6-7 years post residency will likely pay significantly less.
Plus I have very little belief that the loan forgiveness will stick around in it's current form.
 
I signed up for IBR and have almost a year in, really hoping PSLF stays around or im gonna be working like a dog and living like a resident for like 4-5 years as an attending to get this crap paid off. Sucks that finding an ED job with a non-profit is next to impossible. Im gonna really hate my life if I have to be a hospitalist for 4 years just for PSLF. Heres to hoping intensivists are generally employed directly by the hospital.
 
Unless you are going to do academics anyway, the program likely won't work out in your favor.
Taking an academic job for 6-7 years post residency will likely pay significantly less.
Plus I have very little belief that the loan forgiveness will stick around in it's current form.

Education department stated that any changes made to these programs (of which changes have been proposed) would not impact anyone currently paying as they have a contract staying it is a Program option and they will honor that contract.
 
I signed up for it in residency and after applying for jobs found out that basically unless you're in academics (making 100K less per year that a private group job) basically nothing qualifies for the public service. It's still not a bad option while you're in residency because it's not like you're going to be able to afford a $2,000K/month payment anyway and you never know where the road will lead, but I'm just going to suck it up for the next 5 years and get it paid off early before the interest hits me any harder.
 
Education department stated that any changes made to these programs (of which changes have been proposed) would not impact anyone currently paying as they have a contract staying it is a Program option and they will honor that contract.

actually, i think you'll find that they've been very non-specific about what will happen to current payees. what they've guaranteed is that your payment OPTIONS will be unaffected - i.e., my IBR payments will not change. but as to the matter of loan forgiveness, that has not explicitly been addressed, and quite intentionally, in my opinion.
 
actually, i think you'll find that they've been very non-specific about what will happen to current payees. what they've guaranteed is that your payment OPTIONS will be unaffected - i.e., my IBR payments will not change. but as to the matter of loan forgiveness, that has not explicitly been addressed, and quite intentionally, in my opinion.

Its seemed pretty clear to me. But since the proposal (even if passed) is just a 'budget' and budgets have no standing in law... they're closer to legally voted on suggestions as to what laws should be passed... the official departments dont want to release guidelines on unapproved 'suggestions'. They'd rather stay vague until there is actually a law out there to comment on concretely. But even then, the proposal is pretty clear about not touching the PSLF program for current borrowers. Right in the proposal it recommends that existing borrows have "access to all current program benefits from all loan options available to them... at time of master promissory note". Further more it repeatedly states that the master promissory note is to be honored for those who have already signed it.

Right from mine:

"A Public Service Loan Forgiveness program is available that provides for the cancellation of the remaining balance due on your eligible Direct Loan Program loans after you have made 120 full, on-time, scheduled monthly payments (after October 1, 2007) on those loans under certain repayment plans while you are employed full-time by certain public service organizations."

The promissory note guarantees that will be an option, and the proposal states that the benefit listed is available to me even if its not available to future borrowers.

A quick search of the internet will pull up tons of sites that have all analyzed the wording and come up with the same two opinions 1) budgets arent law and 2) if what is written in the budget becomes law, then everyone currently repaying loans will have fully intact PSLF after 120 payments. Could they go and vote up different wording from the current proposal, wording that eliminates the PSLF completely? Definitely, but then youre worrying about stuff that hasnt even been suggested by anyone yet.
 
Last edited:
Its seemed pretty clear to me. But since the proposal (even if passed) is just a 'budget' and budgets have no standing in law... they're closer to legally voted on suggestions as to what laws should be passed... the official departments dont want to release guidelines on unapproved 'suggestions'. They'd rather stay vague until there is actually a law out there to comment on concretely. But even then, the proposal is pretty clear about not touching the PSLF program for current borrowers. Right in the proposal it recommends that existing borrows have "access to all current program benefits from all loan options available to them... at time of master promissory note". Further more it repeatedly states that the master promissory note is to be honored for those who have already signed it.

Right from mine:

"A Public Service Loan Forgiveness program is available that provides for the cancellation of the remaining balance due on your eligible Direct Loan Program loans after you have made 120 full, on-time, scheduled monthly payments (after October 1, 2007) on those loans under certain repayment plans while you are employed full-time by certain public service organizations."

The promissory note guarantees that will be an option, and the proposal states that the benefit listed is available to me even if its not available to future borrowers.

A quick search of the internet will pull up tons of sites that have all analyzed the wording and come up with the same two opinions 1) budgets arent law and 2) if what is written in the budget becomes law, then everyone currently repaying loans will have fully intact PSLF after 120 payments. Could they go and vote up different wording from the current proposal, wording that eliminates the PSLF completely? Definitely, but then youre worrying about stuff that hasnt even been suggested by anyone yet.

Strange. My MPN has a very similar, but more vague statement regarding the PSLF.

"A public service loan forgiveness program is also
available. Under this program, the remaining
balance due on your eligible Direct Loan Program
loans may be cancelled after you have made 120
payments on those loans (after October 1, 2007)
under certain repayment plans while you are
employed in certain public service jobs."

It doesn't seem like it guarantees anything.
 
Some people do have may. It's been discussed elsewhere in SDN that it seems to be related to signing in the last two or three years or earlier than that.
 
Its seemed pretty clear to me. But since the proposal (even if passed) is just a 'budget' and budgets have no standing in law... they're closer to legally voted on suggestions as to what laws should be passed... the official departments dont want to release guidelines on unapproved 'suggestions'. They'd rather stay vague until there is actually a law out there to comment on concretely. But even then, the proposal is pretty clear about not touching the PSLF program for current borrowers. Right in the proposal it recommends that existing borrows have "access to all current program benefits from all loan options available to them... at time of master promissory note". Further more it repeatedly states that the master promissory note is to be honored for those who have already signed it.

Right from mine:

"A Public Service Loan Forgiveness program is available that provides for the cancellation of the remaining balance due on your eligible Direct Loan Program loans after you have made 120 full, on-time, scheduled monthly payments (after October 1, 2007) on those loans under certain repayment plans while you are employed full-time by certain public service organizations."

The promissory note guarantees that will be an option, and the proposal states that the benefit listed is available to me even if its not available to future borrowers.

A quick search of the internet will pull up tons of sites that have all analyzed the wording and come up with the same two opinions 1) budgets arent law and 2) if what is written in the budget becomes law, then everyone currently repaying loans will have fully intact PSLF after 120 payments. Could they go and vote up different wording from the current proposal, wording that eliminates the PSLF completely? Definitely, but then youre worrying about stuff that hasnt even been suggested by anyone yet.

"by certain public service organizations"

This is not defined in the note.
They can just change the qualifying organizations.
Eliminate hospitals, etc.

As someone who could get loans forgiven, this would be great.
As a taxpayer, I'd rather see the program eliminated.
 
Unrelated but fun anecdote: So numerous finance managers have explained to me that this program more or less MAKES money for the government. Nearly all people who use it will eventually pay more than their original loan amount prior to the 120th payment. Often much more.

But physicians break the system through the nature of a long period of poor pay with close to 100% being in qualifying jobs (nearly all residencies are in not for profits. Though not all) for those years. Being able to let interest build up and pay a pittance towards it for 3-5-or-7 years means you'll never get near your original loan amount in the handful of years you do pay. And the widespread use by physicians is making this look like something that will end up losing money (so far no one has actually qualified yet)

For physicians the system is broken. So they could potentially redefine hospitals.... But somehow I just really doubt it since it would fly in the face of why the program was created. And no one has discussed in the least any suggestions of modifying those definitions. In sure we could sit around and think up hundreds of doomsday scenarios that are potentially possible in some reality, but none of them have any (even anecdotal) evidence to suggest it's something to be concerned about.

If you all want to discuss potential what if worst case scenarios, I won't stand in your way. It's just one of my pet peeves. I just hate getting paranoid about potential things that are totally possible theoretically, but only theoretically.
 
As far as I understand I wouldn't be able to be a part of a physician group for those 7 years. Id have to be directly employed by the hospital or it doesnt qualify as a tax exempt organization under 501 (c)(3) which then means the loans wouldn't be forgiven.

You are correct. From my understanding, as gman and colbert noted above, it is literally almost impossible outside of academics and government (ie. VA) to find a qualifying job in emergency medicine. As long as you know that going in...
 
As someone who could get loans forgiven, this would be great.
As a taxpayer, I'd rather see the program eliminated.

Do you really think they're going to lower (or more accurately, refrain from raising) your future taxes because this loan forgiveness program goes away. LOL. High earners have a target on their backs.

For this very reason, as many physicians as possible should take advantage of this program if they can. Get a small percent back of that ~$80-100k per year that will be stolen from you on a yearly basis in the future. Call it a return on your future "tax investment."
 
Do you really think they're going to lower (or more accurately, refrain from raising) your future taxes because this loan forgiveness program goes away. LOL. High earners have a target on their backs.

For this very reason, as many physicians as possible should take advantage of this program if they can. Get a small percent back of that ~$80-100k per year that will be stolen from you on a yearly basis in the future. Call it a return on your future "tax investment."

Of course they won't lower my taxes.
The only way that would ever happen is by reducing government spending.
This is just another example of a government program that I don't think needs to exist.
Don't want to derail this thread with a tax discussion.
 
Its seemed pretty clear to me. But since the proposal (even if passed) is just a 'budget' and budgets have no standing in law... they're closer to legally voted on suggestions as to what laws should be passed... the official departments dont want to release guidelines on unapproved 'suggestions'. They'd rather stay vague until there is actually a law out there to comment on concretely. But even then, the proposal is pretty clear about not touching the PSLF program for current borrowers. Right in the proposal it recommends that existing borrows have "access to all current program benefits from all loan options available to them... at time of master promissory note". Further more it repeatedly states that the master promissory note is to be honored for those who have already signed it.

Right from mine:

"A Public Service Loan Forgiveness program is available that provides for the cancellation of the remaining balance due on your eligible Direct Loan Program loans after you have made 120 full, on-time, scheduled monthly payments (after October 1, 2007) on those loans under certain repayment plans while you are employed full-time by certain public service organizations."

The promissory note guarantees that will be an option, and the proposal states that the benefit listed is available to me even if its not available to future borrowers.

A quick search of the internet will pull up tons of sites that have all analyzed the wording and come up with the same two opinions 1) budgets arent law and 2) if what is written in the budget becomes law, then everyone currently repaying loans will have fully intact PSLF after 120 payments. Could they go and vote up different wording from the current proposal, wording that eliminates the PSLF completely? Definitely, but then youre worrying about stuff that hasnt even been suggested by anyone yet.

Wow, you have a lot of faith in the government.

I could gamble and not pay off my loans ASAP, but that might cost me a few hundred thousand if the government bails.

I simply don't think they will be handing out 200k+ in debt forgiveness while restlessly trying to lower the reimbursements of physicians.

It will be interesting when a the NYT article comes out for that fellowship trained neurosurgeon who had 7 years residency, 1 year fellowship, 1 year research - followed by paying 1 year at an attending salary applies for PSLF and gets 400k in debt forgiven while earning 500k. That will be an interesting write up and public reaction. We'll see what happens after that guy gets his forgiveness...

This program is utterly amazing for those who train for 7 or 8 years. And those people are out there. Their loans could be increasing during all of residency, as 15% of a resident's salary may not keep up with the interest on larger loans.

Anyway, yeah - I'd recommend everyone who can to pay off their high interest loans (>6%). Obviously if you can't, then let's hope PSLF works for you.
 
Last edited:
Any residents currently paying back their student loans in residency?

I am thinking of taking advantage of the IBR during residency so I'd only have 7 years left working at a qualifying hospital (assuming this works out), once I get done with residency and then I'd take advantage of the public service loan forgiveness and have $100K forgiven of my loans.

I just started researching into the different payment options and on paper it seems like a decent deal if it goes through. Has anyone had any experience with this?

FYI, no one has ever had their loans forgiven.

And for all the people who say, "Oh, the wording says... blah blah". Do you realize how easy it is for these people to change things? "Oh, it's guaranteed." Haha. Doesn't everyone realize that it says, "while you are employed full-time by certain public service organizations." Do you know how nonbinding that is? Want to make sure no one gets it? Decide to change the classification of "certain public service organizations." Just by changing that definition and making only a few hospitals in each state qualify, then it's over. That's just one simple idea, the government is much more creative and conniving also.

Unrelated but fun anecdote: So numerous finance managers have explained to me that this program more or less MAKES money for the government. Nearly all people who use it will eventually pay more than their original loan amount prior to the 120th payment. Often much more.

But physicians break the system through the nature of a long period of poor pay with close to 100% being in qualifying jobs (nearly all residencies are in not for profits. Though not all) for those years. Being able to let interest build up and pay a pittance towards it for 3-5-or-7 years means you'll never get near your original loan amount in the handful of years you do pay. And the widespread use by physicians is making this look like something that will end up losing money (so far no one has actually qualified yet)

For physicians the system is broken. So they could potentially redefine hospitals.... But somehow I just really doubt it since it would fly in the face of why the program was created. And no one has discussed in the least any suggestions of modifying those definitions. In sure we could sit around and think up hundreds of doomsday scenarios that are potentially possible in some reality, but none of them have any (even anecdotal) evidence to suggest it's something to be concerned about.

If you all want to discuss potential what if worst case scenarios, I won't stand in your way. It's just one of my pet peeves. I just hate getting paranoid about potential things that are totally possible theoretically, but only theoretically.

Great point. They made the program because they thought no one would be able to capitalize on it!

Exactly. This is how the government thinks. When they created social security, most people were dying around the time they would have to start paying for stuff. That's the whole idea behind these programs. Now that people are using social security for decades, they are realizing it's going bankrupt! This loan program is no different. The people who are training for 8 years and not paying down their balances are making them realize, "Holy crap. We may have to actually start paying lots of money!"

It's not long before they decide to change the terms or be clever about changing how you qualify. This happens all the time. It's a repeat of history.

I would bet a lot of money that what we are calling PSLF will be completely different in 5-10 years. It is possible that they pay for some people for a year or two, but that would be about it. The neurosurgeons are going to clean up on this program (70-80% of their payback will be during residency).
 
Its 10% now, not 15%. There are qualification criteria, but most people nowadays are doing 10% of disposable income.

10%... that's worse than I thought. I'm rooting for all of you with big loan balances but I would NEVER recommend making 250k and saying, "Hmm, I will get this all forgiven in 5 years so I guess I'll only pay 10% of my income".

Yikes.
 
10%... that's worse than I thought. I'm rooting for all of you with big loan balances but I would NEVER recommend making 250k and saying, "Hmm, I will get this all forgiven in 5 years so I guess I'll only pay 10% of my income".

Yikes.


Why not, save extra cash, and if the program fails, then take that money and pay off the loans. Would make less sense to make big payments and find out you could have had it all forgiven.
 
Why not, save extra cash, and if the program fails, then take that money and pay off the loans. Would make less sense to make big payments and find out you could have had it all forgiven.

True. Definitely worth the gamble if you're disciplined. Free money is free money.
 
Strange. My MPN has a very similar, but more vague statement regarding the PSLF.

"A public service loan forgiveness program is also
available. Under this program, the remaining
balance due on your eligible Direct Loan Program
loans may be cancelled after you have made 120
payments on those loans (after October 1, 2007)
under certain repayment plans while you are
employed in certain public service jobs."

It doesn't seem like it guarantees anything.

from what I have seen not all residencies qualify for PSLF and it seems like finding eligible jobs afterward is tricky...therefore I am looking more at PAYE.

But as for PAYE (forgiveness following 10% of discretionary income for 20 years)...is this a BINDING contract we will be entitled to?

If so, why can't the forgiveness (hopefully non-taxable) come FIRST followed by the 20 years of 10%? Whether forgiveness comes today or in 20 years, whatever portion of your income the state actually gets back over those years would be the same. Cancelling all of this debt would be costly, but I don't see how our government wouldn't mind the idea of seizing 10% of our salaries for 20 years. Most people would end up paying back more this way than they originally owed.
 
Last edited:
from what I have seen not all residencies qualify for PSLF and it seems like finding eligible jobs afterward is tricky...therefore I am looking more at PAYE.

But as for PAYE (forgiveness following 10% of discretionary income for 20 years)...is this a BINDING contract we will be entitled to?

If so, why can't the forgiveness (hopefully non-taxable) come FIRST followed by the 20 years of 10%? Whether forgiveness comes today or in 20 years, whatever portion of your income the state actually gets back over those years would be the same. Cancelling all of this debt would be costly, but I don't see how our government wouldn't mind the idea of seizing 10% of our salaries for 20 years. Most people would end up paying back more this way than they originally owed.

The order is done that way because if you miss any payments (including the ones for $0.00 the first year) and they boot you out of the program.
 
The order is done that way because if you miss any payments (including the ones for $0.00 the first year) and they boot you out of the program.
are you saying it is setup like this so more people lose eligibility for the forgiveness and end up paying more?

Regardless, it would be very easy for the state to simply garnish 10% of our pay for 20 years. Which is a ton of money, and still likely a net profit for the government in the end. Fair offer
 
If I had to put money on it, I'd bet that the program will continue, but that there will be a cap on it at some point and that cap will probably be somewhere in the area of 1 year's worth of your loans.

This program was not designed with physicians and their large debt burden and income. It was meant more for people getting MSW and MEd degrees (as an example).

That said, no reason not to pursue it while you can. There's no downside to that.
 
If I had to put money on it, I'd bet that the program will continue, but that there will be a cap on it at some point and that cap will probably be somewhere in the area of 1 year's worth of your loans.

This program was not designed with physicians and their large debt burden and income. It was meant more for people getting MSW and MEd degrees (as an example).

That said, no reason not to pursue it while you can. There's no downside to that.

Right now the proposal on the table is to convert all future repayment plans to PAYE. But those same plans will all be capped at only $57,500 in forgiveness. The wording of the new policy states all current repayment plans and their benefit will be honored. If you want to be paranoid you can argue that they can change the definitions of the words they use... But I get the feeling that may lead to a lawsuit or fifty for breach of contract.

Doesn't mean those bringing the suit would win, only that they'd have good case, and one the fed does want to avoid.
 
I'm wondering, if these proposed changes get passed and current borrowers will be able to switch from the 20-year PAYE to the 25-year plan simply to avoid the tax bomb. For someone with a ballooned debt (700k+), the taxes paid on the forgiven amount could reach 300k+.
 
Right now the proposal on the table is to convert all future repayment plans to PAYE. But those same plans will all be capped at only $57,500 in forgiveness. The wording of the new policy states all current repayment plans and their benefit will be honored. If you want to be paranoid you can argue that they can change the definitions of the words they use... But I get the feeling that may lead to a lawsuit or fifty for breach of contract.

Doesn't mean those bringing the suit would win, only that they'd have good case, and one the fed does want to avoid.

Nothing like suing the government... Anyway, if it does last - I bet it's for a year or two. The public just has to catch wind of a 500k salary receiving 300k in forgiveness. At that point it's game over. N = 100 or N = 1. Game over.

I agree it will continue with a cap. Like that 57k cap.
 
Why not, save extra cash, and if the program fails, then take that money and pay off the loans. Would make less sense to make big payments and find out you could have had it all forgiven.

If the money you save can beat a 6.8% ROI.



Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
 
Even if your loans are at 7%, doesn't it seem worth the risk to take IBR and plan on PSLF (assuming your loans were taken out today or earlier), but each month put the difference between your IBR repayment and your actual payment (or however much you could pay if there was no IBR/PSLF) into a post-tax dividend-paying growth fund with an ER <0.5? (or pre-tax after talking to accountants regarding pulling these funds out tax-free for "education")

After ten years, if if you "loose", you will likely only be "out" a relatively small amount and you may be way ahead. And with a $300K win, this seems like a relatively small risk in the investment sense.

And if your loans are 4% or less, this seems like a no-brainer to me.

Will someone with more financial knowledge explain where my thinking is wrong, because it must be wrong given all of the posts in multiple forums...

HH
 
I'm wondering, if these proposed changes get passed and current borrowers will be able to switch from the 20-year PAYE to the 25-year plan simply to avoid the tax bomb. For someone with a ballooned debt (700k+), the taxes paid on the forgiven amount could reach 300k+.

Forgiven debt through PSLF is tax free. Forgiven debt at the end of a PAYE or IBR term is not. That's another contentious point of it all. That PSLF is tax free.
 
I'm wondering, if these proposed changes get passed and current borrowers will be able to switch from the 20-year PAYE to the 25-year plan simply to avoid the tax bomb. For someone with a ballooned debt (700k+), the taxes paid on the forgiven amount could reach 300k+.
in all honesty, the government's unwillingness to set it up to offer forgiveness first, followed by the 20/25/whatever years of 10% wage garnishment says a lot about how sustainable they think these programs' futures are. They refuse to put their money where their mouth is. ALL this would do is change the sequence of events. Final payment amount remitted by borrow to government would be the same.

disclaimer: I am an incoming medical student and a nobody here. I am just concerned about the immense debt I will be taking on.
 
Forgiven debt through PSLF is tax free. Forgiven debt at the end of a PAYE or IBR term is not. That's another contentious point of it all. That PSLF is tax free.

Not exactly true. There are three loan forgiveness programs. One is the traditional work as a primary care physician in the middle of nowhere and have taxfree loan forgiveness after 10 years. Emergency physicians dont qualify so dont bother considering this option.

Next loan forgiveness program is that available after paying IBR or PAE loans for 10 years. So u pay $500/month during residency and $2000-2500/month as an attending. You do this for 10 years, 120 payments and hold down full time job with a qualifying nonprofit and you can get your remaining loan balance forgiven (assuming congress doesn't change current program) but also keep in mind that paying $2500/month for 7 years will make a significant dent in your loan (ie. $168K-210K dent) and you may not get job in a qualifying nonprofit anyways. In any case the loan balance forgiven in this case is not tax free. You would need to count it as income earned that year.

Last option is that loan forgiveness after paying IBR for 25 years or PAE for 20 years. In any case if you are paying +$2000/month you wont have any loans left to pay after 11 yr 12 years anyway. So basically option 2 can benefit some that have loan balances of more than the national average for med students of $175K. But you are looking at 100K forgiven if that. And today something came out in the news that Obama wants to cap loan forgiveness at $57K.
 
Last edited:
Next loan forgiveness program is that available after paying IBR or PAE loans for 10 years. So u pay $500/month during residency and $2000-2500/month as an attending. You do this for 10 years, 120 payments and hold down full time job with a qualifying nonprofit and you can get your remaining loan balance forgiven (assuming congress doesn't change current program) but also keep in mind that paying $2500/month for 7 years will make a significant dent in your loan (ie. $168K-210K dent) and you may not get job in a qualifying nonprofit anyways. In any case the loan balance forgiven in this case is not tax free. You would need to count it as income earned that year.
This part of your post is wrong. If you make 120 loan payments under IBR or PAYE while working for a non-profit, the rest of your loan will be forgiven tax free.
 
When they created social security, most people were dying around the time they would have to start paying for stuff. That's the whole idea behind these programs. Now that people are using social security for decades, they are realizing it's going bankrupt!
Not true. In 1940, 53% of the men and 60% of the women who it to 21 made it to age 65. More significantly, the entire social security program was reworked in 1983 at a time when almost 70% of men and more than 80% of women who made it to 21 were making it to age 65. http://www.ssa.gov/history/lifeexpect.html The program has a projected shortfall in large part because the 1983-era projections overestimated the percentage of income would fall beneath the FICA cap amounts. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=...ers/BriefingPaper287.pdf&hl=en_US&chrome=true
 
Let this be said, whether people want to believe it or not, the one thing our government can be described as woukd be "incredibly predictable." I can't think of the last time something snuck up and surprised people without months of extremely clear foreshadowing.

There is no foreshadowing about eliminating pslf for those who are already signed up. And there is pretty strong evidence out there that it is specifically not being considered. obviously, it would be smart to keep your ear to the ground because it could happen.anything is possible, but *at this moment* its very very unlikely. But if it does ever happen to us loan payers, it will come with some forewarning (almost certainly). The rumblings we hear now are foreshadowing a potential change in all of the new loan takers.
 
This part of your post is wrong. If you make 120 loan payments under IBR or PAYE while working for a non-profit, the rest of your loan will be forgiven tax free.


Good to know! I was trying to think of ways I could circumvent paying $30K in taxes for the potential $100K to be canceled.

"Note that the forgiveness associated with the income-contingent repayment (ICR) and income-based repayment (IBR) programs can be excluded from income in certain situations and is taxable in others. The balance remaining after 25 years of repayment under ICR and IBR is forgiven. This forgiveness is taxable because it does not require employment in a particular profession. However, public service loan forgiveness, which forgives the remaining balance after 10 years in repayment under ICR and/or IBR, is excluded from income because the borrower must repay the loans while employed full-time in public service."
 
Let this be said, whether people want to believe it or not, the one thing our government can be described as woukd be "incredibly predictable." I can't think of the last time something snuck up and surprised people without months of extremely clear foreshadowing.

There is no foreshadowing about eliminating pslf for those who are already signed up. And there is pretty strong evidence out there that it is specifically not being considered. obviously, it would be smart to keep your ear to the ground because it could happen.anything is possible, but *at this moment* its very very unlikely. But if it does ever happen to us loan payers, it will come with some forewarning (almost certainly). The rumblings we hear now are foreshadowing a potential change in all of the new loan takers.

I think those rumblings are definitely being heard right now....

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303887804579503894256072308?mg=reno64-wsj

I may as well play it safer and sign up for IBR and hope any potential loan forgiveness will be grandfathered in for those already signed up.
 
I think those rumblings are definitely being heard right now....

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303887804579503894256072308?mg=reno64-wsj

I may as well play it safer and sign up for IBR and hope any potential loan forgiveness will be grandfathered in for those already signed up.

That literally had close to nothing to do so with PSLF and the plan to curb it. The only part that even begins to touch on reigning in PSLF is specific to new borrowers only (something I don't dispute is out there being discussed right now) and is prefaced with "Congress is unlikely to pass the proposed revamp this year"

Though I do, honestly, applaud you for going to the WSJ for it. There is lots of interesting things in the article about all the plan options in general. And it touches on an interesting phenomenon among some universities.

For those without WSJ subscriptions
http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303887804579503894256072308?mg=reno64-wsj
 
The only factor to consider, there could be a large difference in the income of a person who works for a "qualifying employer" and the free market. 7 years on an attending salary is a long time. And I've definitely seen annual income variances of 10-20%.

Regardless, I think it's anyone's best guess right now.

Looks like October 2017 is the first time people can apply for forgiveness. So if you've been paying for multiple years now, you're in luck. I honestly can't imagine this thing lasting for 5 years (2022) for physicians with debt > 100/200k. Even after 1 year (2018) there will be public outcry.
 
Top