Would you deny service to a medical malpractice lawyer in any situation except trauma? What about a cop who gave you a speeding ticket for going 50 in a 45?
Maybe you should be Pre-Vet then 😉I might deny service to Michael Vick, but thats still a toss up.
Would you deny service to a medical malpractice lawyer in any situation except trauma? What about a cop who gave you a speeding ticket for going 50 in a 45?
No.
Especially for the cop with regards to the speeding ticket. It was you doing the wrongdoing, not the guy doing his job!
This thread is ridiculous. Give us a real dilemma.
I actually have a friend who got out of a "driving without insurance" ticket when he accidentally gave the cop his med student ID card instead of the drivers license. The cop let him go , saying "theres 2 types of people i dont give ticket to: other cops and doctors. Now go get yourself some insurance"
If your mom was found dismembered in a dumpster a few weeks later and that cop didn't care, would you blame him?Would you deny service to a medical malpractice lawyer in any situation except trauma? What about a cop who gave you a speeding ticket for going 50 in a 45?
Even if it involves treating a drunk driver that killed a family member in a crash? (just a hypothetical situation)
On a random note, "If I were a doctor, I wouldn't have to write any more essays about why I want to be a doctor."
Also, why assume that all medical malpractice lawyers are evil? There could be one or two genuinly out to help patients. Of course, I could also recieve acceptances to everywhere I applied tomorrow. Anything's possible.
Even if it involves treating a drunk driver that killed a family member in a crash? (just a hypothetical situation)
Would you deny service to a medical malpractice lawyer in any situation except trauma?
What about a cop who gave you a speeding ticket for going 50 in a 45?
Would you deny service to a medical malpractice lawyer in any situation except trauma? What about a cop who gave you a speeding ticket for going 50 in a 45?
This is rediculous. For you even to think that makes me question your motives for medicine.
You're not a judge, jury, or executioner.
You're a doctor.
You treat patient who need it. Period.
I might deny service to Michael Vick, but thats still a toss up.
I might deny service to Michael Vick, but thats still a toss up.
I might deny service to Michael Vick, but thats still a toss up.
Hmm ... I believe you take some type of 'oath.' Honestly you can't deny treatment to anyone, nor should anyone want to. You are a Dr, you treat the patient no matter what.
Its good to see you guys feel so strongy about doing the right thing. You guys will make great doctors one day. The reason why I brought this up is because most of the seminars my parents attend, this question is brought up, and most doctors who have had law suits that, even though they may have done nothing wrong and were given the ruling in their facor, have decided not to treat any malpractice lawyers.
And i just threw in the whole speeding ticket thing cuz I really hate cops even though my brother is one. All they care about is their salary.
Hmm ... I believe you take some type of 'oath.' Honestly you can't deny treatment to anyone, nor should anyone want to. You are a Dr, you treat the patient no matter what.
Thats the most idiotic comment ive ever heard. Do you know what NYC cops are paid? They could make the exact same amount going into sanitation, and not get shot at. They make a pittance for what they actually do.
i wouldn't deny him service...i would just "slam his body against the ground" and then "soak him with water and electrocute him"
eye for an eye and all that fun stuff...![]()
There was an episode of Touched by an Angel many years ago that dealt with this. Gerald McRaney (I think that's his name) played some kind of surgeon who had to decide whether or not to operate on this guy who had some kind of life-or-death-can't-wait-until-another-doctor-is-found situation. The thing is, a few years back the guy had been driving while drunk and had hit and killed all (five?) of the doc's kids. I still remember this as one of the most wrenching hours of television I have ever watched...it was just heartbreaking. Good writing and good acting made it so believable that by the end, I was just wrapped up on the couch absolutely destroyed, and I'm not usually like that.perhaps I would have difficutly treating a drunk driver who just ran over my family.
Dude garbagemen in NYC get paid pretty damn well. The only downside are rats. I'd rather be shot in my vest than lose my finger to a filthy rat.Thats the most idiotic comment ive ever heard. Do you know what NYC cops are paid? They could make the exact same amount going into sanitation, and not get shot at. They make a pittance for what they actually do.
Dude garbagemen in NYC get paid pretty damn well. The only downside are rats. I'd rather be shot in my vest than lose my finger to a filthy rat.
gosh, sounds like justification to refuse to treat garbagemen
![]()
uh...that's just not true. you take no oath that says "i will treat everyone, no matter what." the oath says "do no harm."
doctors choose not to treat patients all the time. doctors frequently tell patients to find another doctor if, for whatever reason, they no longer want to treat a certain patient. maybe the patient is rude, or doesn't pay, or any other of a million reasons.
so, yes, if a person is not about to die in front of you, you absolutely can choose not treat someone. no law or oath says otherwise.
sheesh, why aren't you asking if others would treat anyone on a med malpractice review board?
or the CLIENT/PLAINTIFF who sued a doc?
honestly, how many of you would bet your child's life that there's no doc out there who deserves to be sued? that no patient EVER has a right to sue a doc?
what a bunch of vindictive crybabies
*shrug* Ill refer these patients to you then.
So if you don't treat them because you have a personal issue with the patient, then refer them to someone else and something happens in the process; that isn't doing harm?? Don't take it word for word literally. If the patient is there, you treat them; no matter what.
JaggerPlate brought up a very good point...If you we're to refer a patient to another doctor because you didn't care to help them. Let's say for instance, this patient was widely known for a single lawsuit against a doctor that won them millions of dollars, all because they hired a great lawyer. Let's say you didn't even bother to diagnose them, you just reffered them to another MD, and they died a week later, just days before they were scheduled to see another doctor, due to a systemic hemorrhage that resulted, because nobody noticed they had some autoimmune disorder. Would you feel guilty? Would you even just question yourself?
Would you deny service to a medical malpractice lawyer in any situation except trauma? What about a cop who gave you a speeding ticket for going 50 in a 45?
Thats the most idiotic comment ive ever heard. Do you know what NYC cops are paid? They could make the exact same amount going into sanitation, and not get shot at. They make a pittance for what they actually do.
At least if a drunk driver kills your family, it's accidental, not that that makes it any easier to bear. Someone who is a perpetuator of domestic violence knows exactly what they're doing, and does so intentionally. I differentiate between the two.
Drunk driving is not an accident. They choose to drink, they choose to get behind the wheel. I think that drunk driving is punished far too lightly in our society. Its the best way to kill someone, and you will hardly be punished.