The reports I have been hearing and reading about the amount of free time during pre-clinical years have been astoundingly inconsistent, and I am starting this thread so that actual med students can help clarify why these reports are so inconsistent.
On the one hand, a bunch of students relate that if you manage your time well then there is plenty free time to pursue research and other extra curricular activities. Surely, to some extent this is confirmed by a number of med students who seem to have the time to monitor and take part in discussions regularly on this very forum during the school year.
On the other hand, there seem to be a glut of reports like the following, which make med school out to be something quite different
Now, I understand that "every student is different" and that everyone has their own study patterns, but is individual student variation the sole difference-maker here? Does the "truth" lie somewhere between these two extremes? Are some schools P/F curricula much harder than others? Are reports like the latter merely hyperbolic?
On the one hand, a bunch of students relate that if you manage your time well then there is plenty free time to pursue research and other extra curricular activities. Surely, to some extent this is confirmed by a number of med students who seem to have the time to monitor and take part in discussions regularly on this very forum during the school year.
On the other hand, there seem to be a glut of reports like the following, which make med school out to be something quite different
Imagine you get up every day at 7am. You then either go to class or study from a book for the next ten hours, maybe taking a break to eat, write an email, or, if you are one of the smarter students, either exercise or interact with another human being.
Ok. Now do it 6 days a week. For two years.
Medical school content is not hard. It is most memorizing details more than it is understand concepts. The knowledge you obtain in the first two years will allow you to then conceptualize disease, and do some pretty serious cognitive reasoning.
There is no correlation to your P-Chem class in terms of committment, time, or subject matter.
Now, I understand that "every student is different" and that everyone has their own study patterns, but is individual student variation the sole difference-maker here? Does the "truth" lie somewhere between these two extremes? Are some schools P/F curricula much harder than others? Are reports like the latter merely hyperbolic?