Inpatient Rehab Bashing

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

phoenix0610

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
93
Reaction score
2
I've lurked on this site for a while, and only more recently started to post (and am very thankful for all the helpful information I've recieved), and there's one thing that has been consistent: the constant, for lack of a better term, dissing of inpatient rehab by PM&R docs that haven chosen to work in other areas of the field. For a field that has an idenity and respect problem, this seems counter-productive. It's honest and respectable work from the experiences I've had so far--so why do we bash it? Appreciate any and all comments.
 
I've lurked on this site for a while, and only more recently started to post (and am very thankful for all the helpful information I've recieved), and there's one thing that has been consistent: the constant, for lack of a better term, dissing of inpatient rehab by PM&R docs that haven chosen to work in other areas of the field. For a field that has an idenity and respect problem, this seems counter-productive. It's honest and respectable work from the experiences I've had so far--so why do we bash it? Appreciate any and all comments.

One the positive side, it's good, honest work with daily patient interaction where you can see and measure improvement from week to week. You can get paid decently with low overhead. The patients appreciate it and you can help prevent a lot of complications.

On the negative side, it really doesn't take much training to do it, yet we spend half of our residencies doing it. It is generally not respected by other fields, but seen as a dumping ground for patients they've lost interest in or can't send home and want to D/C from their service. While you are in the hospital, if you have a clinic, the clinic is losing money. You can often make more money in the clinic/hr than you can on the rehab ward.

Outpt = no call. Inpt = lot's 'o call.
Outpt = I go where ever I want on weekends. Inpt = I stay within 30 min travel.
Inpt = Dealing with Hospital administators and politics. Outpt = much less.
Outpt = complex, think about it and try different things for each patient medicine. Inpt = Writing daily notes that don't change much, either from day-to-day or from patient-to-patient.
 
Sometimes, inpatient and outpatient is discussed in such black and white terms when it is part of the continuum of physiatric practice.

Inpatient rehabilitation can be quite challenging and rewarding. Pathologies such as brain injury, stroke, sci, neurological disease each present there seperate issues that can push a physician intellectually...management of ventilator weaning and decanulation, spasticity, neurogenic bladder and various peripheral problems such as post-operative spine surgery radiculopathy and foot drop or the agitated, compulsive brain injury are all very important medical needs.

As a resident, I saw myself doing outpatient msk exclusively, then I had a rotation as a senior where the attending let me really take the inpatient service as my own and I found it rewarding. Nonetheless, already focused on outpatient msk, I took a job in that area. I found that practicing that exclusively became very mind numbing.

I now have a job with inpatient responsibilities, outpatient work that is both msk/electrodiagnostic and inpatient follow-up, and also consultation in the hospital. I find the variety quite interesting and challenging and would prefer to not do just one exclusively. I take call once every six weeks and when oncall work about 4-5 hours on saturday and sunday.

The field is a continuum of practice, remember a good outpatient spine specialist can find cervical myelopathy on exam, which is best learned by actually seeing true spinal cord injury.
 
Last edited:
This thread stinks, I was hoping we could DO the inpatient rehab bashing here.

I could do inpatient rehab as a consultant, but not as the admitting or discharging team. Show up for new admits within 48hrs, let the IM folks manage the patient, and I'd set the PT/OT/ST family conference schedules and make the appropriate bowel/bladder/belly/rehab plans.
 
Sometimes, inpatient and outpatient is discussed in such black and white terms when it is part of the continuum of physiatric practice.

Inpatient rehabilitation can be quite challenging and rewarding. Pathologies such as brain injury, stroke, sci, neurological disease each present there seperate issues that can push a physician intellectually...management of ventilator weaning and decanulation, spasticity, neurogenic bladder and various peripheral problems such as post-operative spine surgery radiculopathy and foot drop or the agitated, compulsive brain injury are all very important medical needs.

As a resident, I never saw myself doing outpatient msk exclusively, then I had a rotation as a senior where the attending let me really take the inpatient service as my own and I found it rewarding. Nonetheless, already focused on outpatient msk, I took a job in that area. I found that practicing that exclusively became very mind numbing.

I now have a job with inpatient responsibilities, outpatient work that is both msk/electrodiagnostic and inpatient follow-up, and also consultation in the hospital. I find the variety quite interesting and challenging and would prefer to not do just one exclusively. I take call once every six weeks and work about 4-5 hours on saturday and sunday.

The field is a continuum of practice, remember a good outpatient spine specialist can find cervical myelopathy on exam, which is best learned by actually seeing true spinal cord injury.

Your job sounds amazing😀
 
This thread stinks, I was hoping we could DO the inpatient rehab bashing here.

I could do inpatient rehab as a consultant, but not as the admitting or discharging team. Show up for new admits within 48hrs, let the IM folks manage the patient, and I'd set the PT/OT/ST family conference schedules and make the appropriate bowel/bladder/belly/rehab plans.

hahahaha--but seriously, it goes back to the whole image issue--how is PM&R ever going to gain any ground if it eats its own?
 
sorry to ruin your fun.


This thread stinks, I was hoping we could DO the inpatient rehab bashing here.

I could do inpatient rehab as a consultant, but not as the admitting or discharging team. Show up for new admits within 48hrs, let the IM folks manage the patient, and I'd set the PT/OT/ST family conference schedules and make the appropriate bowel/bladder/belly/rehab plans.
 
it goes back to the whole image issue--how is PM&R ever going to gain any ground if it eats its own?

From what I have seen, it does go back to the whole image issue. It's two things from what I've read here and also been told by others. Either its (1) how other fields handle inpatient PM&R and (2) how programs handle inpatient.

1) I couldn't tell you how many times on my trauma rotation I saw an attending ask "what the hell is this patient still doing on my floor?" Can't send the patient home, because more likely than not they were an unhelmeted MCC with a colostomy, 12 JP drains, a vac, a cornucopia of ortho problems, a complete C-spine SCI with a collar still in place, and possibly a TBI thrown on top.

Even if medicine had a bed, they sometimes wouldnt take the pt. If they were with it enough to have psych issues, the psych service suddenly forgot how to practice medicine cuz they wouldnt even take pts with IVs, God forbid a PICC or central line was still in place.

Only place left to throw them was the rehab facility across town after the drains came out and the ex-fix was thrown away. Patient is too sick for rehab, but since other departments are throwing their weight around to get the patients off the floor, rehab takes them.

2) Partly the "old school" way and partly because change from these ways moves slowly, residents and attendings (many of whom chose the outpatient routs) feel as though its intern year all over again with slightly better hours and call (not all cases). Little rehab, mostly medicine. Add in the scenario from #1 and the fact that its far cheaper to hire a resident to staff the service than an NP/PA AND you can work them harder, hence the less favorable opinion of inpatient rehab. You can get two (or more) residents for the price of one NP/PA, and you can work each of them twice as hard with little to no worry of outright complaining. You already know as a 3rd year what complaining gets you :meanie:

From a business perspective, inpatient generates more coin for the program, so making you do more inpatient only makes sense. On the flip side, you make more money doing outpatient than inpatient per hr, as PMR 4 MSK pointed out.

From a resident's perspective, I can see why inpatient would be less attractive--it seems to be mostly political. I want to do a mix of inpt and outpt and can see why inpt would be tiresome to some degree.

These aren't my opinions of inpatient, just a summary of what I have read here on the forum and was told over time.

I think what I hear is unfortunate because I do see a great career in it. I think you know what the answer is...young upstarts like us changing the game. I def am a type A personality, but lets see if I have enough patience for the pissing matches that occur in the academic world to help the situation :laugh:
 
What you have to remember is that a majority of folks who post on here are residents, recent grads or folks in outpatient rehab. If you pay attention to the few attendings in inpatient you'll find that they're very enthusiastic about their specialty.

Most residents or those in academics don't have a great perspective because we as residents in academic institutions have no control over who comes to the rehab unit. The medical director doesn't necissarily have a ton of inpatient responsibility so they're filling the beds with whoever they can as the residents slave away taking care of patients who are inappropriate and often a little to sick to meaningfully participate.

From what I've heard from those in private practice doing a lot of inpatient, they have control over who comes to the rehab unit and if someone screws them, they can refuse to admit patients from them (if you're stubborn enough). In academics there's also a lot of politics that get in the way of the patient's best interest. Although, sometimes a patient may be better off managed medically by rehab docs than other services.

When patients are appropriate to come to rehab we can do good things. When patients aren't quite appropriate, they often end up getting readmitted to a medicine service or discharged to a SNF. So if you think about it, if you get to choose who you admit, and you know they're appropriate, chances are their outcomes will be better and everyone involved will be more satisfied.

Disclaimer: Don't plan to do much/any inpatient when I finish- but just finished get whalloped on an inpatient rotation.😡
 
Inpatient rehab is very different in the private practice - community rehab setting. Incorporating some inpatient coverage (round in the morning then go to outpatient clinic in the afternoon) to your practice in addition to interventional spine/MSK and EMG/NCS can be very lucrative and rewarding. If you are the type of person who doesn't want to "put all your eggs in one basket" this is a great way to go. Inpatient rehab can bill quite well with relatively little work. If it is within a hospital setting, getting internal medicine consult is actually appreciated by the internists - and they will handle most complicated medical issues so you can concentrate on rehab issues like pain, sleep issues, psychological support, orthotics/prosthetics/assistive devices, etc. Most community rehab call is home pager call and the pager rarely goes off. Weekend only needs one day of rounding per weekend - which might take a few minutes per patient - and is shared by the other physiatrists in the group.

The academic setting is different because patients are usually sicker, consult services are usually staffed by residents who have no financial incentives for seeing patients so therefore are resentful of receiving new consults, and there is very little control of ancillary staff, etc. so residents end up compensating for shortfalls of other support staff (like social work or nursing) and end up doing scutwork. In an efficiently run community inpatient rehab - there's minimal scutwork and more respect.

Although I am in a pain fellowship and enjoy MSK/pain practice - I actually liked the inpatient side of rehab and wouldn't mind working in a similar setting as NJDevil. A friend of mine who graduated a few years ahead of me recently took a job paying very well (better than pure pain/spine jobs) doing exactly what I described above - inpatient rehab (with 20+ beds filled with medically stable patients), EMG/NCS, interventions, and clinic. She sees it as job security - if reimbursement of one area goes down, she still has several other areas to fall back on.

I think there are some vocal people on this board who are bitter about their residency experiences and unfortunately have only had negative experiences during their inpatient rehab rotations. I had a few rough moments(late admissions, inappropriate admissions, codes) but mostly enjoyed the actual practice of inpatient rehab. My gripes were mostly about administrative/system issues - and those factors are better in non-academic rehab settings. There are also some bitter unhappy inpatient rehab academic attendings who lament the surge of PM&R residents going into pure MSK/pain practice which I actually think is counterproductive because it creates even more of a divide.

I'm probably more of a lumper than a splitter - but I actually think that physiatrists have a lot in common - regardless of whether they do inpatient or outpatient/MSK. Our focus on function is similar. Our physical exam skills are similar. Our philosophy of treating patients as a whole is similar. The communication skills we use with our patients are similar. The team approach is similar. Our utilization of PT/OT/SLP is simimlar. So I believe there is a core set of principles that should be taught during residency and that core should shape one's identity as a physiatrist first and subspecialist second. Splitting and arguing will not help our field and will not help our advocacy and standing within medicine and society.
 
I'm probably more of a lumper than a splitter - but I actually think that physiatrists have a lot in common - regardless of whether they do inpatient or outpatient/MSK. Our focus on function is similar. Our physical exam skills are similar. Our philosophy of treating patients as a whole is similar. The communication skills we use with our patients are similar. The team approach is similar. Our utilization of PT/OT/SLP is simimlar. So I believe there is a core set of principles that should be taught during residency and that core should shape one's identity as a physiatrist first and subspecialist second. Splitting and arguing will not help our field and will not help our advocacy and standing within medicine and society.

I agree with most of the similarities, except the similarity in physical examination skills. Not that one is better than the other, but they are definitely different.
 
Last edited:
I think what we need to be honest about, is that for the vast majority of Physiatry residents who are lost to inpt rehab, the defining moments generally occur during the PGY-2 year. If we want more residents bolstering the inpt ranks, inpt training needs to change. Residents can only do so much to initiate change, just as those of us in private practice don’t really have any say in the matter. Ultimately, the responsibility rests with the academic guys in charge.

Competitive geographic regions tend to have an ample supply of specialists who may perform similar or related services (anesthesiologists, neurologists, rheumatologists, occ med physicians, geriatricians, etc.) The little bit of inpt/out/EMG/injections type practices typically don’t work out so well in these locations. In a way, it’s like the difference in practice between rural FP vs. well-heeled suburb FP. Which type do you think is delivering babies and doing colonoscopies?
The AAPMR has come to terms with, or at least has taken the first step in accepting “subspecialization”, which is why the major PM&R niches each have their own PASSOR type organization (membership council).

I can’t completely agree with previous descriptions of community inpt practice. During residency, my “community” inpt training was through a large successful PM&R private practice group with a free standing rehab hospital and coverage of multiple community hospitals. New hires and non-partners shared call, which usually consisted of 100 Sat. and 100 Sun. notes at the freestanding hospital, plus coverage of several other units and a few SNFs. Of all the Physiatrists on staff, there was a CEO and about 5 super partners at the top. New hires would typically work a year or two and move-on. Ironic, there was even a Physiatrist with a significant disability for whom no special accommodations were made. This was the only rotation where I was managing septic TBI patients, having cardiac patients going into V-Tach, and calling the ambulance for transfers on a nightly basis.

So, this was my experience on how profits are made in community inpt rehab. Really, no different than any other specialty in medicine.

Back to the original topic of the thread. There will always be residents interested in inpt rehab. The specialty has survived for over 60 years after all. For the foreseeable future, that proportion of the total of PM&R residents will remain in the minority. If we wish to convince more residents to go into inpt, it will have to be made appealing to the remaining 60-70%, and that starts on day 1 of the first inpt rotation.
 
I've lurked on this site for a while, and only more recently started to post (and am very thankful for all the helpful information I've recieved), and there's one thing that has been consistent: the constant, for lack of a better term, dissing of inpatient rehab by PM&R docs that haven chosen to work in other areas of the field. For a field that has an idenity and respect problem, this seems counter-productive. It's honest and respectable work from the experiences I've had so far--so why do we bash it? Appreciate any and all comments.

Physiatry is a broad field. There are members in some subspecialties who have specialized to the point that their practices/skill sets bear little resemblance to physiatrists in other selected subspecialties. (I think most physiatrists, even the subspecialists, share more in common than they realize or care to admit, but that [confession] is another topic entirely.) There are aspects to the practice of specific subspecialties that are less attractive, both to the subspecialists who practice it as well as to those who don't.

As for the "respect" issue, I don't dwell on this issue. Everyone has their own definition of what is important, desirable, respectable, and these are often influenced by factors such as lifestyle, financial reward, public perception, history, etc. "Respect" and similar issues of perception matter more to some than to others. I experience much more distress when I see clinicians practicing their specialty poorly, or when rehabilitation hospitals/industry fail to act when confronted with evidence of disreputable practices (e.g. New Medico, RehabONE, and a certain rehab company that was based out of the deep south, etc.)

I believe strongly in the importance of the work that I do, in the need for good care for the patients I care for, and for my/our responsibility to generate new knowledge to provide better care for these patients in the future. I like some aspects of my work, and dislike others (esp. the paperwork). It is not for everyone, and I certainly don't think that anyone can do it. It does generate a good income for my family. What others may think of BI medicine/physiatry, inpt or otherwise, and whether others respect me for practicing in this field, is less important. It still works for me.
 
Last edited:
I think what I hear is unfortunate because I do see a great career in it. I think you know what the answer is...young upstarts like us changing the game. I def am a type A personality, but lets see if I have enough patience for the pissing matches that occur in the academic world to help the situation :laugh:[/quote]

I do so love a good pissing match now and again--bring it on😎
 
hahahaha--but seriously, it goes back to the whole image issue--how is PM&R ever going to gain any ground if it eats its own?

Crocodilians (gators and crocs) have been around for millions of years and they eat their own. They and sharks are possibly the most successful animals ever... 😀

I started out after residency gung-ho on inpt rehab, even after 2/3rd of PM&R residency was inpt. Things change - what you want to do right out of residency might change when you get into the "real world."
 
Crocodilians (gators and crocs) have been around for millions of years and they eat their own. They and sharks are possibly the most successful animals ever... 😀

I started out after residency gung-ho on inpt rehab, even after 2/3rd of PM&R residency was inpt. Things change - what you want to do right out of residency might change when you get into the "real world."

ahh, the evolution angle. well played......

not to beat a dead horse with the animal analogy, but to me, the 300 pound elephant in the room is the huge difference between the two practice setting of inpatient and outpatient.

ok, so as physiatrists, we focus on function. o.....k....... are there any similarities besides that between the 2 groups? if so, they are very small IMHO.
 
My personal bias is that I think its the exposure during residency that steers us away. On this rotation we work harder than most outpatient rotations, its less than gratifying with the amount out work to be done to satisfy insurance requirements and heavily loaded with a heaps of paperwork. Learning experiences are there, but when your service is super-busy the priority is to get the work done. This to me is not appealing (or educationally driven....🙄) unless ofcourse you have residents who are running your service.... 🙁
My experience may not reflect those of others, but from what I have read over the years it does strike a common thread with most.
 
I think that most people agree with the goals and philosophy of inpatient rehabilitation, they just don't like the practice of it. The day to day practice of it straddles the border between "humpty-dumpty medicine" and medical social work. But it didn't always used to be this way.

To understand how things "got this way" you need to understand a little bit of history...sit down and talk to inpatient physiatrists in private practice circa 1980-1995. These were the "Golden Years." These were pre-Stark I (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989); pre-prosepctive payment/DRG; pre-HealthS*outh/Richard Scrushy industry-wide accounting scandal, etc. In short, inpatient rehab made money. I mean MAD MONEY ---and not in some convoluted, accrural-based, cost-accounting/cost-shifting way that only 3 PhD Health Economists and Stephen Hawkins can understand, but in real honest to goodness CASH ACCOUNTING--a penny earned for a penny's work way.

You see in the early 80's "Greed was Good," we were all living in Reagan's "shining city on a hill," and inpatient rehab made money. Get the picture? Rehab hospitals were opening up like Starbucks and bursting at the seams with medically straight-forward post-op total knees and hips. Grandma would sooner die than go to a nursing home and the Cash-Cow rehab hospitals were posh---one private rehab hospital in the Mid-west boasted Gold-plated faucets...it had to end...and it did.

In the early 1980's, the salary figures for inpatient physiatrists bandied about were, "$10-15K per rehab bed per year that you keep filled." Want to make half-a-mill? Keep 40 rehab beds full per year. And, as any recent grad will attest, rounding on 40 medically-stable post-op total knees (with a PA mind you) might take the better part of 2.5 hours.

I did my first rehab rotation as a medical student the summer of 1997 at a private rehab hospital in Dallas. It was like showing up the morning after a huge party. The whole field was hung-over. The hand-writing was on the wall: Inpatient rehab was dead. The excesses from the 1980's were going to be repatriated. CMS (formerly HCFA) ran the numbers and rehab was too expensive. There was over-utilization, mis-utilization, and quite frankly out-right fraud. The Feds wanted their "40 acres and a mule" and they were going to take it right out the pockets of physiatrists. It was in this climate that most recent grads began their training.

Now patients had to actually "medically qualify" for rehab based upon an arbitrary and more or less capricious set of 18 or so diagnoses. And, you had to fill at least 75% of your beds with these so-called "medically-qualified" patients. Oh, and by the way, we (the Feds) would like to engage in a little "risk-sharing" with you physiatrists. We'll pay you up front one lump for your rehab admission and you can "manage the costs" during there entire rehab stay. No more gravy train.

When people get desperate they behave desperately. As residents, it was quite interesting to watch our attendings engage in feats of self-deception and mental gymnastics beyond all belief to "fill those beds." Yesterday, Mr. Jones couldn't "tolerate 3 hours of therapy," but today lo' and behold he can. Presto! Oh, and now that we're being paid "prospectively" suddenly airline economics begins to make perfect sense: First, sell your beds at best price to the commerical insurance "medically-qualified" customers; then sell your beds to the "break-even" government payors; and finally open the flood-gates and let-in the "all-comers." It's going to cost the same amount of money to fly that plane with the seats empty or full (plus or minus a little fuel difference) so FILL THOSE BEDS!!! Rehab went from premium first-class recuperation to dumping ground...and who bore the brunt of the dump?? Those idealistic, pie-in-the-sky, pre-80 hour work week physiatry residents that's who. Late admissions? No problem. FILL THOSE BEDS!!! Non-medically qualified Medicare patients languishing on surgical wards or SNF's? No problem FILL THOSE BEDS!!! Neurosurg needs an extra bed in ICU? No problem---just tell the neurosurg PA to write "transfer to rehab." Magic happens. FILL THOSE BEDS!!!

When you let others define what you do you become their little b*tch. So, in order to "FILL THOSE BEDS!!!" there was no "act of kindness" that an accomodating attending physiatrist wouldn't perform for his or her referring "customer." And, in this new Ponzi-esque prospective payment scheme, rehab units and rehab hospitals essentially became hospital "loss leader" service lines. Showing up for work every day in such an environment can be a little demoralizing. Demoralized people are not the most inspiring people to work around and residents certainly can tell where they are on the hospital hierarchy---as a specialty and as a resident. It's like showing up every day and just loading the truck. Thus, the mass emigration to outpatient physical medicine.

There a variety of other factors that turn off residents to inpatient rehab. Most programs lack a clear and structured progression of clinical responsibilities for its residents. In many ways, I was doing the same thing at the end of my physiatry residency that I was doing my first week of internship. Physiatry is one of the few specialties that battles its own allied health providers on scope of practice issues. You don't see radiology techs or respiratory techs lobbying for "independent practice" do you? But, you'll see PT's post here from time to time and assert that they believe that hospital-based physiatrists are superfluous. Many of these PT's/OT's, etc eventually climb the ranks of hospital administration and become "program managers" or "admission coordinators" etc. They are valuable team players, but their expertise cannot replace a physiatrist's...

As others have posted, community-based inpatient rehab is a little different from what residents see in the academic medical centers. This is probably because "all politics is local." I still do some inpatient rehab. It's enjoyable because I have control of the situation. I have hospitalists I can consult who are "johnny on the spot" anytime I need them day or night. Try getting a hospitalist to follow a rehab patient at most teaching programs...good luck! And, most importantly, the way I practice medicine is not defined by the whims of others. The patients can come when I decide they are ready to come. If you don't like it, get a new physiatrist.
 
This was the "Cliff-notes" version of "The Rise and Fall of Rehabilitation Medicine".

Alternative titles will be entertained, assuming that the author (Dr. Russo) will permit, (and if he allow me to serve as a co-editor).
 
Nice thread. Strong post drusso.

Inpatient anything is different from outpatient anything. Different strokes for different folks. I know IM hospitalists who cringe at the thought of general IM clinic. The pace is different, the pathologies are different, the complications are different, the outcomes are different, the paperwork is different, and h ell yeah the politics are different. Being on service and on call (even if you’re taking call from home) constitutes different kinds and levels of responsibility and stress. Some people thrive in this type of environment, some don’t. The key, as drusso astutely points out, is the freedom to practice medicine the way you want to practice medicine. “When you let others define what you do you become their little b*tch.” – I’m seriously considering using this as my signature.

And as far as bashing - It’s an internet forum. What did you expect?

Outpatient docs bash inpatient docs. Private docs bash academics. Residents & fellows bash attendings. Programs get bashed. Geographic locations get bashed. Patients bash doctors. Therapists bash doctors. Other specialties bash us. We bash back. Bashing thickens the skin – makes for a good physiatrist.

Part of it may be venting (from the student/resident standpoint), part of it may be reopening of old wounds (from the fellow/attending standpoint), part of it is legitimate complaining that, if everyone speaks loud enough, might possibly start getting some changes accomplished.
 
"And as far as bashing - It's an internet forum. What did you expect? ...Outpatient docs bash inpatient docs. Private docs bash academics. Residents & fellows bash attendings. Programs get bashed. ..."

I don't remember anyone bashing our outpt colleagues. (Not that anyone should.)

Musculoskeletal medicine/physiatry is/ought to be CORE physiatry, plain & simple. I just stick to my guns regarding the fact that there are elements of neuro/rehabilitation medicine that ought to be considered core aspects of the field too, even if colleagues would ultimately decide not to practice in those areas after they graduate.

Having said this, I also agree with my esteemed colleague, Ludicolo, that this relatively anonymous forum is tailor-made for bashing (especially residency training/programs).
 
Last edited:

Part of it may be venting (from the student/resident standpoint), part of it may be reopening of old wounds (from the fellow/attending standpoint), part of it is legitimate complaining that, if everyone speaks loud enough, might possibly start getting some changes accomplished.


Exactly! I don't make a habit of starting controversial and inciting threads for kicks (well, maybe I do, but that's another story...) What's the next step? Again, I don't have as much experience as many here do, but this is what I've decided to do with my life and I want to be pro-active.
 
i think that most people agree with the goals and philosophy of inpatient rehabilitation, they just don't like the practice of it. The day to day practice of it straddles the border between "humpty-dumpty medicine" and medical social work. But it didn't always used to be this way.

To understand how things "got this way" you need to understand a little bit of history...sit down and talk to inpatient physiatrists in private practice circa 1980-1995. These were the "golden years." these were pre-stark i (omnibus budget reconciliation act of 1989); pre-prosepctive payment/drg; pre-healths*outh/richard scrushy industry-wide accounting scandal, etc. In short, inpatient rehab made money. I mean mad money ---and not in some convoluted, accrural-based, cost-accounting/cost-shifting way that only 3 phd health economists and stephen hawkins can understand, but in real honest to goodness cash accounting--a penny earned for a penny's work way.

You see in the early 80's "greed was good," we were all living in reagan's "shining city on a hill," and inpatient rehab made money. Get the picture? Rehab hospitals were opening up like starbucks and bursting at the seams with medically straight-forward post-op total knees and hips. Grandma would sooner die than go to a nursing home and the cash-cow rehab hospitals were posh---one private rehab hospital in the mid-west boasted gold-plated faucets...it had to end...and it did.

In the early 1980's, the salary figures for inpatient physiatrists bandied about were, "$10-15k per rehab bed per year that you keep filled." want to make half-a-mill? Keep 40 rehab beds full per year. And, as any recent grad will attest, rounding on 40 medically-stable post-op total knees (with a pa mind you) might take the better part of 2.5 hours.

I did my first rehab rotation as a medical student the summer of 1997 at a private rehab hospital in dallas. It was like showing up the morning after a huge party. The whole field was hung-over. The hand-writing was on the wall: Inpatient rehab was dead. The excesses from the 1980's were going to be repatriated. Cms (formerly hcfa) ran the numbers and rehab was too expensive. There was over-utilization, mis-utilization, and quite frankly out-right fraud. The feds wanted their "40 acres and a mule" and they were going to take it right out the pockets of physiatrists. It was in this climate that most recent grads began their training.

Now patients had to actually "medically qualify" for rehab based upon an arbitrary and more or less capricious set of 18 or so diagnoses. And, you had to fill at least 75% of your beds with these so-called "medically-qualified" patients. Oh, and by the way, we (the feds) would like to engage in a little "risk-sharing" with you physiatrists. We'll pay you up front one lump for your rehab admission and you can "manage the costs" during there entire rehab stay. No more gravy train.

When people get desperate they behave desperately. As residents, it was quite interesting to watch our attendings engage in feats of self-deception and mental gymnastics beyond all belief to "fill those beds." yesterday, mr. Jones couldn't "tolerate 3 hours of therapy," but today lo' and behold he can. Presto! Oh, and now that we're being paid "prospectively" suddenly airline economics begins to make perfect sense: First, sell your beds at best price to the commerical insurance "medically-qualified" customers; then sell your beds to the "break-even" government payors; and finally open the flood-gates and let-in the "all-comers." it's going to cost the same amount of money to fly that plane with the seats empty or full (plus or minus a little fuel difference) so fill those beds!!! Rehab went from premium first-class recuperation to dumping ground...and who bore the brunt of the dump?? Those idealistic, pie-in-the-sky, pre-80 hour work week physiatry residents that's who. Late admissions? No problem. Fill those beds!!! Non-medically qualified medicare patients languishing on surgical wards or snf's? No problem fill those beds!!! Neurosurg needs an extra bed in icu? No problem---just tell the neurosurg pa to write "transfer to rehab." magic happens. Fill those beds!!!

When you let others define what you do you become their little b*tch. So, in order to "fill those beds!!!" there was no "act of kindness" that an accomodating attending physiatrist wouldn't perform for his or her referring "customer." and, in this new ponzi-esque prospective payment scheme, rehab units and rehab hospitals essentially became hospital "loss leader" service lines. Showing up for work every day in such an environment can be a little demoralizing. Demoralized people are not the most inspiring people to work around and residents certainly can tell where they are on the hospital hierarchy---as a specialty and as a resident. It's like showing up every day and just loading the truck. Thus, the mass emigration to outpatient physical medicine.

There a variety of other factors that turn off residents to inpatient rehab. Most programs lack a clear and structured progression of clinical responsibilities for its residents. In many ways, i was doing the same thing at the end of my physiatry residency that i was doing my first week of internship. Physiatry is one of the few specialties that battles its own allied health providers on scope of practice issues. You don't see radiology techs or respiratory techs lobbying for "independent practice" do you? But, you'll see pt's post here from time to time and assert that they believe that hospital-based physiatrists are superfluous. Many of these pt's/ot's, etc eventually climb the ranks of hospital administration and become "program managers" or "admission coordinators" etc. They are valuable team players, but their expertise cannot replace a physiatrist's...

As others have posted, community-based inpatient rehab is a little different from what residents see in the academic medical centers. This is probably because "all politics is local." i still do some inpatient rehab. It's enjoyable because i have control of the situation. I have hospitalists i can consult who are "johnny on the spot" anytime i need them day or night. Try getting a hospitalist to follow a rehab patient at most teaching programs...good luck! And, most importantly, the way i practice medicine is not defined by the whims of others. The patients can come when i decide they are ready to come. If you don't like it, get a new physiatrist.

bravo
 
I think that most people agree with the goals and philosophy of inpatient rehabilitation, they just don't like the practice of it. The day to day practice of it straddles the border between "humpty-dumpty medicine" and medical social work. But it didn't always used to be this way.

To understand how things "got this way" you need to understand a little bit of history...sit down and talk to inpatient physiatrists in private practice circa 1980-1995. These were the "Golden Years." These were pre-Stark I (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989); pre-prosepctive payment/DRG; pre-HealthS*outh/Richard Scrushy industry-wide accounting scandal, etc. In short, inpatient rehab made money. I mean MAD MONEY ---and not in some convoluted, accrural-based, cost-accounting/cost-shifting way that only 3 PhD Health Economists and Stephen Hawkins can understand, but in real honest to goodness CASH ACCOUNTING--a penny earned for a penny's work way.

You see in the early 80's "Greed was Good," we were all living in Reagan's "shining city on a hill," and inpatient rehab made money. Get the picture? Rehab hospitals were opening up like Starbucks and bursting at the seams with medically straight-forward post-op total knees and hips. Grandma would sooner die than go to a nursing home and the Cash-Cow rehab hospitals were posh---one private rehab hospital in the Mid-west boasted Gold-plated faucets...it had to end...and it did.

In the early 1980's, the salary figures for inpatient physiatrists bandied about were, "$10-15K per rehab bed per year that you keep filled." Want to make half-a-mill? Keep 40 rehab beds full per year. And, as any recent grad will attest, rounding on 40 medically-stable post-op total knees (with a PA mind you) might take the better part of 2.5 hours.

I did my first rehab rotation as a medical student the summer of 1997 at a private rehab hospital in Dallas. It was like showing up the morning after a huge party. The whole field was hung-over. The hand-writing was on the wall: Inpatient rehab was dead. The excesses from the 1980's were going to be repatriated. CMS (formerly HCFA) ran the numbers and rehab was too expensive. There was over-utilization, mis-utilization, and quite frankly out-right fraud. The Feds wanted their "40 acres and a mule" and they were going to take it right out the pockets of physiatrists. It was in this climate that most recent grads began their training.

Now patients had to actually "medically qualify" for rehab based upon an arbitrary and more or less capricious set of 18 or so diagnoses. And, you had to fill at least 75% of your beds with these so-called "medically-qualified" patients. Oh, and by the way, we (the Feds) would like to engage in a little "risk-sharing" with you physiatrists. We'll pay you up front one lump for your rehab admission and you can "manage the costs" during there entire rehab stay. No more gravy train.

When people get desperate they behave desperately. As residents, it was quite interesting to watch our attendings engage in feats of self-deception and mental gymnastics beyond all belief to "fill those beds." Yesterday, Mr. Jones couldn't "tolerate 3 hours of therapy," but today lo' and behold he can. Presto! Oh, and now that we're being paid "prospectively" suddenly airline economics begins to make perfect sense: First, sell your beds at best price to the commerical insurance "medically-qualified" customers; then sell your beds to the "break-even" government payors; and finally open the flood-gates and let-in the "all-comers." It's going to cost the same amount of money to fly that plane with the seats empty or full (plus or minus a little fuel difference) so FILL THOSE BEDS!!! Rehab went from premium first-class recuperation to dumping ground...and who bore the brunt of the dump?? Those idealistic, pie-in-the-sky, pre-80 hour work week physiatry residents that's who. Late admissions? No problem. FILL THOSE BEDS!!! Non-medically qualified Medicare patients languishing on surgical wards or SNF's? No problem FILL THOSE BEDS!!! Neurosurg needs an extra bed in ICU? No problem---just tell the neurosurg PA to write "transfer to rehab." Magic happens. FILL THOSE BEDS!!!

When you let others define what you do you become their little b*tch. So, in order to "FILL THOSE BEDS!!!" there was no "act of kindness" that an accomodating attending physiatrist wouldn't perform for his or her referring "customer." And, in this new Ponzi-esque prospective payment scheme, rehab units and rehab hospitals essentially became hospital "loss leader" service lines. Showing up for work every day in such an environment can be a little demoralizing. Demoralized people are not the most inspiring people to work around and residents certainly can tell where they are on the hospital hierarchy---as a specialty and as a resident. It's like showing up every day and just loading the truck. Thus, the mass emigration to outpatient physical medicine.

There a variety of other factors that turn off residents to inpatient rehab. Most programs lack a clear and structured progression of clinical responsibilities for its residents. In many ways, I was doing the same thing at the end of my physiatry residency that I was doing my first week of internship. Physiatry is one of the few specialties that battles its own allied health providers on scope of practice issues. You don't see radiology techs or respiratory techs lobbying for "independent practice" do you? But, you'll see PT's post here from time to time and assert that they believe that hospital-based physiatrists are superfluous. Many of these PT's/OT's, etc eventually climb the ranks of hospital administration and become "program managers" or "admission coordinators" etc. They are valuable team players, but their expertise cannot replace a physiatrist's...

As others have posted, community-based inpatient rehab is a little different from what residents see in the academic medical centers. This is probably because "all politics is local." I still do some inpatient rehab. It's enjoyable because I have control of the situation. I have hospitalists I can consult who are "johnny on the spot" anytime I need them day or night. Try getting a hospitalist to follow a rehab patient at most teaching programs...good luck! And, most importantly, the way I practice medicine is not defined by the whims of others. The patients can come when I decide they are ready to come. If you don't like it, get a new physiatrist.


Wow.....I was wondering where drusso had been. Guess he made up for lost time.
 
My opinion is that inpatient rehabilitation can be rewarding but by itself can be draining. Getting to do the continuum of care from a consultation to inpatient to outpatient is generally much better. Throw in some EMG's and other procedures and it becomes not only more lucrative but also rewarding mentally.

As a resident all you see is 'inpatient' during your inpatient rotation, and may not get to appreciate the changes that happen that *you* helped recommend and facilitate.

I would agree with the sentiment that academic inpatient PMR or at least inpatient PMR in mega sized hospitals can be a trap position. At these types of hospitals, administrators and hospital executives hold massive amounts of power and physician leadership, even if you are a medical director, can be limited. Therefore your career is defined moreso very much so by what the CEO wants to do.

If of course you are a dynamic personality with tremendous administrative and academic reputation, you can, say, become a CMO at a huge rehabilitation institution but of course, that's like saying, now I got an MBA shall I choose to run GE or Microsoft?

At a smaller or community hospital, physician leadership tends to be able to access hospital leadership easily, and the environment tends to be friendlier. Your chances of running the show the way you want tends to be better.

My final thought on this is that I earlier saw the post that said inpatient needs to be taught differently.

I totally agree. In my opinion the worst inpatient attendings are the ones that lived through the 'good old days' where they just fill the beds. These, in my opinion, are the doctors who look at a consult only as a potential admit and not, say, a way to evaluate how can I help this patient with ex: pain management, positioning, musculoskeletal needs, potential EMG, etc. As a younger physiatrist (<5 years out from graduation), I find that my younger peers who do do some inpatient are hte ones who wish to break free of the stereotypes of older inpatient physiatrists.

Ultimately though, do what YOU want to do, and not what others tell you to do.
 
Top