I'm glad you guys appreciated it 🙂
It was a fairly long read, kept me up past my bedtime last night. In some ways it was hard to read, because of the subject matter, but I thought it was really informative.
I mean, on one level, you just have to wonder -- why aren't people having these conversations? But on the other hand the answer is pretty obvious... death is truly terrifying. I know if I received a terminal diagnosis, I would probably crap my pants.
It is sad though, that so many people and their families don't get a chance to die the way they want to. If I had to die, I'd want to be outside, in a beautiful meadow with the sun shining, and my family all around me. If you are terminally ill and in a LOT of pain, it might be nice to be able to choose, where, how, and when you die. I guess that makes me feel differently about physician assisted suicide in some ways (yeah I know it was not a focus of the article, but I couldn't avoid thinking about it).
I always get really sad when I see chemo patients in the hospital with end-stage cancer who are going through chemo. You can just look at them and see pain in their eyes. I wonder about what they are losing, and what they could gain, by being off of it. Is a couple weeks worth it, in that case? If they are suffering that much?
The most surprising thing in the article for me was that he suggested that medical interventions may not be that helpful for extending a patient's life when the affliction is incurable. I mean, as people involved in healthcare, we have to wonder why we are doing endless procedures, giving limitless drugs, when they ultimately will just compromise quality of life and waste money to boot. I'm really interested in that research he mentioned about figuring out how to combine hospice care with regular treatment, as well as seeing patient outcomes under hospice care as opposed to the "balls to the wall" approach to end-of-life care.