Interpretation of a PS Prompt

[ducle7]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Hi All, it would be great if I could get some feedback on this personal statement writing prompt that I'm confused about. I'm not sure what to do, b/c it only asks for 300-500 words and the prompt does not say to discuss my background. So should I completely omit talking about my previous research experiences and just jump into why I want to be at that school?Here's the prompt:

Compose a brief essay (300-500 words), to be read by professors in your field on your academic and personal intentions and objectives. Identify any special interest you would like to pursue now or in the future. If you have previously attended another graduate school, explain why you wish to transfer.

 

[deleted176373]

No you want to stick to relevant research experience. Not just why you want to be at that school, but what makes you a good fit for their program. Your previous experience may or may not be critical in this regard. Do not omit it if it's relevant. Keep it brief and on point. You can get a lot in on a 500 word essay.


Mark

 

[WaitingKills]

No you want to stick to relevant research experience. Not just why you want to be at that school, but what makes you a good fit for their program. Your previous experience may or may not be critical in this regard. Do not omit it if it's relevant. Keep it brief and on point. You can get a lot in on a 500 word essay.


Mark

I see this asked for a lot in ps's. What does it really mean though? Like, I know how to do this and this and this and therefore you want me, or I have had this and this and this experience and therefore you want me?

I feel like an idiot, but can anyone clarify this?

 

[ducle7]

What I've decided to do is write a brief description of my past experiences and how they've lead up to my choice of pursuing a PhD and then talk about the ideas I'd like to pursue for graduate school, and at the very end, throw in why I'd be great for that school.