Interview Answer to Why you want to be a doctor

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

sahinak

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
So I was wondering what answers were given when interviewers asked "why do you want to be a doctor?" and what field are u interested in..

especially what answer can i say if they ask about emergency medicine.. lol my answer would honestly be.. Its innate.
 
So I was wondering what answers were given when interviewers asked "why do you want to be a doctor?" and what field are u interested in..

especially what answer can i say if they ask about emergency medicine.. lol my answer would honestly be.. Its innate.


just tell them the truth.
 
Last edited:
I don't think anyone in that thread is saying that money is their main motivation...

For me, I'm not completely sure; it's just the only thing I can possibly imagine doing and enjoying. The human body is pretty amazing and I'd love to learn more about it and the changes that occur in pathologies and how to treat them. I'll have a more eloquent answer come interview time. 😀
 
So I was wondering what answers were given when interviewers asked "why do you want to be a doctor?" and what field are u interested in..

especially what answer can i say if they ask about emergency medicine.. lol my answer would honestly be.. Its innate.
Hopefully you can answer this for yourself. If not, you may want to think twice about what you're doing. The same goes for answering about EM. I would think you should have your answer since everyone seems to ask pre-meds "So why do you want to be a doctor?" I didn't have to think much about it for interviews since I got quizzed on it so often by everyone else!

For me the main attraction was my nerdiness about biology and science combined with wanting to put it to immediate and practical use. Research is absolutely essential to medicine, but I prefer to take the research and translate it into care.

I happen to be interested in EM too. I like the broad scope of practice and the adrenaline. Fast paced, quick decision making, good times. And it's a good place for me to use my Spanish, too.
 
Well, for the previous generation of docs, I think money was a huge factor for many. Of course, now it would be foolish to go into medicine just for the money, with our country's socialist tendencies and all (Yeah, I'm going there :meanie:)
:laugh:
 
Well, for the previous generation of docs, I think money was a huge factor for many. Of course, now it would be foolish to go into medicine just for the money, with our country's socialist tendencies and all (Yeah, I'm going there :meanie:)

No way. During the previous generations the economy was cooperating and making other fields much much richer than today. Medicine is a singularly bad path if money is your goal because of how long it takes to get it, if you are going to get it, and the debt involved. You will borrow a quarter of a million dollars in tuition debt and in most cases not earn enough to start repaying that debt for a decade. The fact that the salary is comfortable at the other end needs to be viewed in the context of the time value of money (money later is worth a lot less than money today) and high debt. No other path cripples your earnings in this way. So no, nobody with any common sense in ANY generation goes down this path for money, but certainly the last generation when times were better on Wall Street wouldn't have.

As for socialist tendencies -- hard to predict, but it's clear that medicine has been the only profession losing ground against inflation for the past decade due to decreasing reimbursements, and it's quite likely that physicians will bear the brunt of healthcare reform's tightening of their belts.
 
No way. During the previous generations the economy was cooperating and making other fields much much richer than today. Medicine is a singularly bad path if money is your goal because of how long it takes to get it, if you are going to get it, and the debt involved. You will borrow a quarter of a million dollars in tuition debt and in most cases not earn enough to start repaying that debt for a decade. The fact that the salary is comfortable at the other end needs to be viewed in the context of the time value of money (money later is worth a lot less than money today) and high debt. No other path cripples your earnings in this way. So no, nobody with any common sense in ANY generation goes down this path for money, but certainly the last generation when times were better on Wall Street wouldn't have.

As for socialist tendencies -- hard to predict, but it's clear that medicine has been the only profession losing ground against inflation for the past decade due to decreasing reimbursements, and it's quite likely that physicians will bear the brunt of healthcare reform's tightening of their belts.

For docs currently in their 50s and 60s, they got into medicine in the 1970s and early 80s at a time when there was no forecast of the huge increase in compensation that awaited them - it was more or less unexpected - so it is ridiculous to assume that they got into medicine for the money.

OTOH, most of the grumbling today is coming from docs in their 30s and 40s who got into the field with the expectation that the compensation balloon would keep on rising, but the last 10 years has disabused them of that notion.
 
...

OTOH, most of the grumbling today is coming from docs in their 30s and 40s who got into the field with the expectation that the compensation balloon would keep on rising, but the last 10 years has disabused them of that notion.

Yeah, premeds do a great job of looking at things through rose colored glasses. The facts are out there, but folks still like to find that one older generation relative who did well and say "I'm going to be that guy". Ignoring the fact that nobody has been able to duplicate that kind of path for quite a few years now. You will be comfortable, but not rich. The prior generation in many cases got rich. We are a generation that will not be able to duplicate the successes of the prior generation. Which won't matter much if you are earning a comfortable living doing what you want to do. But will matter a lot if you have dreams of mansions and sports cars and living large. These days, if you are able to raise a family and accomplish home ownership, that's doing great, and probably requires a certain amount of budgeting. In the prior generation of medicine, folks could do that, plus have lots of nice toys and amazing vacations. These days you will be driving to florida instead of jetting to the riviera, eating burgers, not filet mignon. Drinking wine coolers instead of Dom Perignon. That's what medicine is like these days.
 
Yeah, premeds do a great job of looking at things through rose colored glasses. The facts are out there, but folks still like to find that one older generation relative who did well and say "I'm going to be that guy". Ignoring the fact that nobody has been able to duplicate that kind of path for quite a few years now. You will be comfortable, but not rich. The prior generation in many cases got rich. We are a generation that will not be able to duplicate the successes of the prior generation. Which won't matter much if you are earning a comfortable living doing what you want to do. But will matter a lot if you have dreams of mansions and sports cars and living large. These days, if you are able to raise a family and accomplish home ownership, that's doing great, and probably requires a certain amount of budgeting. In the prior generation of medicine, folks could do that, plus have lots of nice toys and amazing vacations. These days you will be driving to florida instead of jetting to the riviera, eating burgers, not filet mignon. Drinking wine coolers instead of Dom Perignon. That's what medicine is like these days.

The "200K Debt Club" thread is a perfect example - any attempt to inject "facts" into the discussion gets hounded off the thread. Perhaps it is just their version of gallows humor, but most of the people taking on these massive debt totals are in deep denial over the trends in declining compensation, rising taxes, and rising interest rates on student debt, and what all of it will mean to their income, lifestyle, ability to fund a retirement, and their ability to repay the debt 10+ years from now.
 
The "200K Debt Club" thread is a perfect example - any attempt to inject "facts" into the discussion gets hounded off the thread. Perhaps it is just their version of gallows humor, but most of the people taking on these massive debt totals are in deep denial over the trends in declining compensation, rising taxes, and rising interest rates on student debt, and what all of it will mean to their income, lifestyle, ability to fund a retirement, and their ability to repay the debt 10+ years from now.

Well, you know, when you argue the same point 5-6 times in a row in a thread intended as a joke, it gets pretty old, pretty fast.
 
No way. During the previous generations the economy was cooperating and making other fields much much richer than today. Medicine is a singularly bad path if money is your goal because of how long it takes to get it, if you are going to get it, and the debt involved. You will borrow a quarter of a million dollars in tuition debt and in most cases not earn enough to start repaying that debt for a decade. The fact that the salary is comfortable at the other end needs to be viewed in the context of the time value of money (money later is worth a lot less than money today) and high debt. No other path cripples your earnings in this way. So no, nobody with any common sense in ANY generation goes down this path for money, but certainly the last generation when times were better on Wall Street wouldn't have.

As for socialist tendencies -- hard to predict, but it's clear that medicine has been the only profession losing ground against inflation for the past decade due to decreasing reimbursements, and it's quite likely that physicians will bear the brunt of healthcare reform's tightening of their belts.


Do well in college, study for the MCAT, and volunteer/shadow a bit - you get into a medical school.

Do well in medical school, study for the STEP exams - you land a high paying residency.

It's not that easy but it is that simple. Debt sucks, but you can have it paid off after a decade. Medicine is hard work, but show me another career path that is as clear cut as 'do well on tests and you'll be earning $200k/year,' and with solid job security to boot.

Go ahead and throw around 'lawyer' or 'businessman' or 'investment banker.' Big law is a crap shoot even at a Top-14 school. Businessman is a crap shoot when most small businesses fail in their first year. Investment banker is a crap shoot, just look at our economy right now.

Nothing matches medicine in terms of money AND job security. It's just delayed gratification. Do well on a bunch of tests and you'll be earning $200k/year...eventually.
 
Yeah, premeds do a great job of looking at things through rose colored glasses. The facts are out there, but folks still like to find that one older generation relative who did well and say "I'm going to be that guy". Ignoring the fact that nobody has been able to duplicate that kind of path for quite a few years now. You will be comfortable, but not rich. The prior generation in many cases got rich. We are a generation that will not be able to duplicate the successes of the prior generation. Which won't matter much if you are earning a comfortable living doing what you want to do. But will matter a lot if you have dreams of mansions and sports cars and living large. These days, if you are able to raise a family and accomplish home ownership, that's doing great, and probably requires a certain amount of budgeting. In the prior generation of medicine, folks could do that, plus have lots of nice toys and amazing vacations. These days you will be driving to florida instead of jetting to the riviera, eating burgers, not filet mignon. Drinking wine coolers instead of Dom Perignon. That's what medicine is like these days.

The "200K Debt Club" thread is a perfect example - any attempt to inject "facts" into the discussion gets hounded off the thread. Perhaps it is just their version of gallows humor, but most of the people taking on these massive debt totals are in deep denial over the trends in declining compensation, rising taxes, and rising interest rates on student debt, and what all of it will mean to their income, lifestyle, ability to fund a retirement, and their ability to repay the debt 10+ years from now.
I'm curious, then, how these people make the cut? I'm not saying they're not qualified intellectually, but your posts assume that these people don't have any idea of how bad they have it/will have it. These people shadow physicians and volunteer, so they see what it's like. I'm assuming that there is this disconnect or, rather, something that someone isn't telling them? Or maybe the admissions committee needs to do a better job in finding out whether or not applicants really know what they're getting themselves into? The HOURS of paperwork? The repetitive, boring, laborious work? The time it takes to pay off the debt? How bad people really are as patients? The fact that 200k in debt isn't something that's easily paid off? I mean, no one even listens to Medical Students/Residents/Fellows/Attendings on these FORUMS, let alone in real life. It's interesting that people still think they'll be happy with the job as long as they have the ability help people.

Answering why you want to be a doctor should include the fact that someone understands these negatives. Medicine is obviously beyond helping people and liking science. But I suppose no one knows how to put it into words.

I generally tend to think people use the same logic they use in volunteering into training to become a physician. The "I'll do this because of the payoff" logic wherein someone believes that as long as they do this or that, they'll get that eventual goal.
 
I'm curious, then, how these people make the cut? I'm not saying they're not qualified intellectually, but your posts assume that these people don't have any idea of how bad they have it/will have it. These people shadow physicians and volunteer, so they see what it's like. I'm assuming that there is this disconnect or, rather, something that someone isn't telling them? Or maybe the admissions committee needs to do a better job in finding out whether or not applicants really know what they're getting themselves into? The HOURS of paperwork? The repetitive, boring, laborious work? The time it takes to pay off the debt? How bad people really are as patients? The fact that 200k in debt isn't something that's easily paid off? I mean, no one even listens to Medical Students/Residents/Fellows/Attendings on these FORUMS, let alone in real life. It's interesting that people still think they'll be happy with the job as long as they have the ability help people.

Answering why you want to be a doctor should include the fact that someone understands these negatives. Medicine is obviously beyond helping people and liking science. But I suppose no one knows how to put it into words.

I generally tend to think people use the same logic they use in volunteering into training to become a physician. The "I'll do this because of the payoff" logic wherein someone believes that as long as they do this or that, they'll get that eventual goal.

We're going to be living in debt-induced misery for decades and we understand that. It's just that we'd rather commiserate and share a good laugh while we can still afford it. Silly threads are for silly posts, after all.👍
 
Hopefully you can answer this for yourself. If not, you may want to think twice about what you're doing.


Nah, not really. Most people have little idea about why they do the things they do, and there is rarely a eureka moment. When asked, most make up a good story.

Over the years I have come to appreciate how elusive the answers to those questions can be. During my first book tour 15 years ago, an interviewer noted that the paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould had dedicated his first book to his father, who took him to see the dinosaurs when he was 5. What was the event that made me become a cognitive psychologist who studies language? I was dumbstruck. The only thing that came to mind was that the human mind is uniquely interesting and that as soon as I learned you could study it for a living, I knew that that was what I wanted to do. But that response would not just have been charmless; it would also have failed to answer the question. Millions of people are exposed to cognitive psychology in college but have no interest in making a career of it. What made it so attractive to me?
As I stared blankly, the interviewer suggested that perhaps it was because I grew up in Quebec in the 1970s when language, our pre-eminent cognitive capacity, figured so prominently in debates about the future of the province. I quickly agreed — and silently vowed to come up with something better for the next time. Now I say that my formative years were a time of raging debates about the political implications of human nature, or that my parents subscribed to a Time-Life series of science books, and my eye was caught by the one called “The Mind,” or that one day a friend took me to hear a lecture by the great Canadian psychologist D. O. Hebb, and I was hooked. But it is all humbug. The very fact that I had to think so hard brought home what scholars of autobiography and memoir have long recognized. None of us know what made us what we are, and when we have to say something, we make up a good story.
 
Do well in college, study for the MCAT, and volunteer/shadow a bit - you get into a medical school.

Do well in medical school, study for the STEP exams - you land a high paying residency.

It's not that easy but it is that simple. Debt sucks, but you can have it paid off after a decade. Medicine is hard work, but show me another career path that is as clear cut as 'do well on tests and you'll be earning $200k/year,' and with solid job security to boot.

Go ahead and throw around 'lawyer' or 'businessman' or 'investment banker.' Big law is a crap shoot even at a Top-14 school. Businessman is a crap shoot when most small businesses fail in their first year. Investment banker is a crap shoot, just look at our economy right now.

Nothing matches medicine in terms of money AND job security. It's just delayed gratification. Do well on a bunch of tests and you'll be earning $200k/year...eventually.
I present exhibit A

Here's the thing I notice about the 200k/year notion/argument. You sacrifice a decade in training to earn this income (we'll say a decade) while drawing up loans averaging 250k. I'll put a counter-example to shed some light into how there are "better options" to consider. You could apply and get into a PhD program in a specialty that will actually be beneficial to something like pharmaceuticals. You're paid 25-30k/year to do this for 3.5-5 years with NO tuition/loans. After that you're able to either do a post-doc OR get a job in the industry netting anywhere from 80k to 120k starting. Do a post-doc and that bumps it up even higher (Current post-doc I know is making that "200k" that's so sought after). So in less than a decade you're already netting a six-figure salary with NO loan repayment owed unless you decide to buy a house/car (which you'll do as a physician so that's negated in this argument). 🙄

Stop this fallacious argument that 200k is impossible to get in anything outside of medicine and that job security is hard to come by. If you're hardworking enough to get by undergrad with a 3.6 gpa and 30ish MCAT, you're not going to die out/fail outside of medicine. You're obviously smart enough/hardworking enough to make it to the point where you don't have to worry about "losing your job" or "not making six figures". The argument you present is naive and a very bad reason to go into medicine.
 
We're going to be living in debt-induced misery for decades and we understand that. It's just that we'd rather commiserate and share a good laugh while we can still afford it. Silly threads are for silly posts, after all.👍

I apologize, I didn't mean to say that you guys are idiots. I'm asking Law2Doc/Flip why they believe what they do. I know you guys are laughing about the debt(so to speak). I would too. I hate people that bicker/worry about debt and stress out about it like it's the end of the world. It's not healthy and it's not like you're getting into debt with no job prospect in site.
 
I present exhibit A

Here's the thing I notice about the 200k/year notion/argument. You sacrifice a decade in training to earn this income (we'll say a decade) while drawing up loans averaging 250k. I'll put a counter-example to shed some light into how there are "better options" to consider. You could apply and get into a PhD program in a specialty that will actually be beneficial to something like pharmaceuticals. You're paid 25-30k/year to do this for 3.5-5 years with NO tuition/loans. After that you're able to either do a post-doc OR get a job in the industry netting anywhere from 80k to 120k starting. Do a post-doc and that bumps it up even higher (Current post-doc I know is making that "200k" that's so sought after). So in less than a decade you're already netting a six-figure salary with NO loan repayment owed unless you decide to buy a house/car (which you'll do as a physician so that's negated in this argument). 🙄

Stop this fallacious argument that 200k is impossible to get in anything outside of medicine and that job security is hard to come by. If you're hardworking enough to get by undergrad with a 3.6 gpa and 30ish MCAT, you're not going to die out/fail outside of medicine. You're obviously smart enough/hardworking enough to make it to the point where you don't have to worry about "losing your job" or "not making six figures". The argument you present is naive and a very bad reason to go into medicine.

Money isn't my only reason for going into medicine.

Average salary for a pharmacology PhD isn't anywhere near $200k, even after a post-doc. http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Degree=Doctorate_(PhD),_Pharmacology/Salary

You know of one person who supposedly earns $200k/year. That's one person. Look at any physician salary survey, where even the lowest paid physicians bring in $150k/year. And that's after polling thousands of physicians, and not just one person.

I hate to break it to you, but $200k/year outside of medicine is very difficult to obtain. Much less $200k/year with rock solid job stability.
 
I apologize, I didn't mean to say that you guys are idiots. I'm asking Law2Doc/Flip why they believe what they do. I know you guys are laughing about the debt(so to speak). I would too. I hate people that bicker/worry about debt and stress out about it like it's the end of the world. It's not healthy and it's not like you're getting into debt with no job prospect in site.

Don't worry about it.👍 Feel free to join us anytime (although you should definitely try not to)!:laugh:
 
Money isn't my only reason for going into medicine.

Average salary for a pharmacology PhD isn't anywhere near $200k, even after a post-doc. http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Degree=Doctorate_(PhD),_Pharmacology/Salary

You know of one person who supposedly earns $200k/year. That's one person. Look at any physician salary survey, where even the lowest paid physicians bring in $150k/year. And that's after polling thousands of physicians, and not just one person.

I hate to break it to you, but $200k/year outside of medicine is very difficult to obtain. Much less $200k/year with rock solid job stability.
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Degree=Doctor_of_Medicine_(MD)/Salary

Are you KIDDING me? According to your own site, your average income for a Physician doesn't meet 200k either.

Regardless, go ahead and compare the two jobs when the PhD is already on their career with six figures and no loans to repay and working significantly less than 80 hours a week.🙄 You HAVE job security with a PhD in pharmacology. You're not out of the job and you're making more than enough in income.
 
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Degree=Doctor_of_Medicine_(MD)/Salary

Are you KIDDING me? According to your own site, your average income for a Physician doesn't meet 200k either.

Regardless, go ahead and compare the two jobs when the PhD is already on their career with six figures and no loans to repay and working significantly less than 80 hours a week.🙄 You HAVE job security with a PhD in pharmacology. You're not out of the job and you're making more than enough in income.

http://www.allied-physicians.com/salary_surveys/physician-salaries.htm
http://www.studentdoc.com/salaries.html
http://www.cejkasearch.com/compensation/amga_physician_compensation_survey.htm
http://www.medfriends.org/specialty_salaries.htm
http://mdsalaries.blogspot.com/

Or go talk to the attendings in the attending forums.
 
🙄
I debunk one site and you're giving me others? And they're surveys. Not to mention it still doesn't make the original site INCORRECT. Which case, that site may be incorrect altogether and therefore what you said about PhD's not netting that income incorrect too.:laugh:

Also, I find it humerous that your original site only has 137 people surveyed for PhD and 5500. Interesting...
 
The "200K Debt Club" thread is a perfect example - any attempt to inject "facts" into the discussion gets hounded off the thread. Perhaps it is just their version of gallows humor, but most of the people taking on these massive debt totals are in deep denial over the trends in declining compensation, rising taxes, and rising interest rates on student debt, and what all of it will mean to their income, lifestyle, ability to fund a retirement, and their ability to repay the debt 10+ years from now.

Seriously, what the hell are you talking about?

The thread was intended as a joke. And however much everyone appreciates your opinion, we don't need it. The guy posting on sdn about "alarming decreases in physician compensation" or "socialized medicine at its worst" or "obama's health care plan is like hitler but worse" is about as ubiquitous as things get around here.

So don't think by "injecting facts" of random stats about physicians salaries you're doing anybody a favor. Everyone who has taken this process seriously (i.e., gotten into a medical school) knows about this. We want to be physicians anyway.
 
first of all.

i honestly am asking a serious question. All of you guys started some nonsense about salary and junk. Its a given doctors make alot of money but that should NOT AT ALL be the reason why you enter medicine. because if you do, youll only be a impassionate doctor who doesnt care for its patient except when the check comes in. i really wanted to know the real reasons as to why people want to become a doctor.

Second of all: please. please get a bit mature (for those that said sex and all)... i would NEVER want a physician of mine to be this immature.

Now if anyone can honestly answer the question, that would be helpful to a fellow premed/junior.

Thank you
 
^
Sex. Did that cause a fuse in your brain to blow? Poor thing.


I present exhibit A

Here's the thing I notice about the 200k/year notion/argument. You sacrifice a decade in training to earn this income (we'll say a decade) while drawing up loans averaging 250k. I'll put a counter-example to shed some light into how there are "better options" to consider. You could apply and get into a PhD program in a specialty that will actually be beneficial to something like pharmaceuticals. You're paid 25-30k/year to do this for 3.5-5 years with NO tuition/loans. After that you're able to either do a post-doc OR get a job in the industry netting anywhere from 80k to 120k starting. Do a post-doc and that bumps it up even higher (Current post-doc I know is making that "200k" that's so sought after). So in less than a decade you're already netting a six-figure salary with NO loan repayment owed unless you decide to buy a house/car (which you'll do as a physician so that's negated in this argument). 🙄


3.5-5 years? Until your PI decides he can get a few more papers out of you and that goes to 5-7 years. And then it's part of the rat-race. Publish or die is the name of the game, both in your PhD and, if you do well enough there, your post-doc. Working for a pharmaceutical is no different. You discover something and do good research, you make money (though definitely not $80-120k starting, unless you're coming from a top, top, top-tier school). You have a bad stretch where nothing productive happens, and you get cut. Need to start looking somewhere else, and explaining why you had an unproductive few years. Could be career-ending, or maybe you'll get lucky and bounce back. Who knows?

That's the attractive feature of medicine. The salaries are high (on average, highest paid professional group), and the job security is there. A doctor is a doctor is a doctor. Unless you break the law, you will not lose your job. You may not work in your preferred locale or your preferred field, but you will still manage to bring home a solid $150-200k per year, no matter what. That simply doesn't exist in other fields.
 
first of all.

i honestly am asking a serious question. All of you guys started some nonsense about salary and junk. Its a given doctors make alot of money but that should NOT AT ALL be the reason why you enter medicine. because if you do, youll only be a impassionate doctor who doesnt care for its patient except when the check comes in. i really wanted to know the real reasons as to why people want to become a doctor.

Second of all: please. please get a bit mature (for those that said sex and all)... i would NEVER want a physician of mine to be this immature.

Now if anyone can honestly answer the question, that would be helpful to a fellow premed/junior.

Thank you

after going through the application process this year, i have thought alot about this question recently. currently, here are my top reasons for pursuing medicine:

1. helping people (don't say this in an interview - AdComs hear it all the time)
2. when lying on my death-bed, i want to look back and be proud of my life
3. challenging myself
4. doing something necessary for our society that most people couldn't do
5. i like science and the human body is just awe-inspiring.

look inside yourself, i think you'll discover your motivations are similar.

edit: i know people will say that i could accomplish many of these things through other means, but seriously, medicine is just the perfect combination of everything i want.

second edit: from here forward, instead of saying i want to help people, im just gonna say i want to save lives. it doesn't have the same weight, but its more accurate and direct.
 
Last edited:
first of all.

i honestly am asking a serious question. All of you guys started some nonsense about salary and junk. Its a given doctors make alot of money but that should NOT AT ALL be the reason why you enter medicine. because if you do, youll only be a impassionate doctor who doesnt care for its patient except when the check comes in. i really wanted to know the real reasons as to why people want to become a doctor.

Second of all: please. please get a bit mature (for those that said sex and all)... i would NEVER want a physician of mine to be this immature.

Now if anyone can honestly answer the question, that would be helpful to a fellow premed/junior.

Thank you

Figure out your own answer and stop asking us to do all the work for you. Everyone is unique so our answers wouldn't really help you anyways.

and saying the word sex makes you immature? and this in turn would make you a bad physician, according to you? there, there, everything will be ok. i'll leave the night light on for you.
 
I'd answer that it appeals to me in several aspects, including subject material (I'm interested in human anatomy and physiology), nature of the work (being depended on, having the authority to make calls, being tested mentally), an interest in surgery (found that I always enjoyed dissections in grade school and was always comfortable with a scalpel in-hand, I like the hands-on nature of surgery) and job security (a competent physician will probably be able to bear economic downturns better than most and I don't foresee an abatement in the need for physicians). I'd also clarify that I didn't mention "helping people" since there are people in many occupations that can be said to be helping people.

Thoughts?
 
after going through the application process this year, i have thought alot about this question recently. currently, here are my top reasons for pursuing medicine:

1. helping people (don't say this in an interview - AdComs hear it all the time)
2. when lying on my death-bed, i want to look back and be proud of my life
3. challenging myself
4. doing something necessary for our society that most people couldn't do
5. i like science and the human body is just awe-inspiring.

look inside yourself, i think you'll discover your motivations are similar.

1. Can you think of a profession that doesn't involve helping people?
2. Who cares? I'd rather be happy for the ~30,000 days I'm not on my deathbed than proud of my sacrifices for the 3 days I am.
3. Isn't medicine pretty repetitive?
4. That's just a tad arrogant.
5. That's a pretty good reason to study medicine, I think, but maybe not a good reason to be a physician.
 
1. Can you think of a profession that doesn't involve helping people?
2. Who cares? I'd rather be happy for the ~30,000 days I'm not on my deathbed than proud of my sacrifices for the 3 days I am.
3. Isn't medicine pretty repetitive?
4. That's just a tad arrogant.
5. That's a pretty good reason to study medicine, I think, but maybe not a good reason to be a physician.

Totally agreed. Especially #1.
 
money, money, money ...




seriously, if you don't know why, do you know what you're getting yourselfi nto
 
I'd answer that it appeals to me in several aspects, including subject material (I'm interested in human anatomy and physiology), nature of the work (being depended on, having the authority to make calls, being tested mentally), an interest in surgery (found that I always enjoyed dissections in grade school and was always comfortable with a scalpel in-hand, I like the hands-on nature of surgery) and job security (a competent physician will probably be able to bear economic downturns better than most and I don't foresee an abatement in the need for physicians). I'd also clarify that I didn't mention "helping people" since there are people in many occupations that can be said to be helping people.

Thoughts?


This makes you sound like a little ****.
 
I'm in this for the kittens.
 
1. Can you think of a profession that doesn't involve helping people?
2. Who cares? I'd rather be happy for the ~30,000 days I'm not on my deathbed than proud of my sacrifices for the 3 days I am.
3. Isn't medicine pretty repetitive?
4. That's just a tad arrogant.
5. That's a pretty good reason to study medicine, I think, but maybe not a good reason to be a physician.

1. fair enough, but this is helping in a somewhat unique way.
2. personal preference - i'm choosing to end my life being proud and happy.
3. no, its constantly evolving.
4. agreed, but its true. the vast majority of people aren't smart enough or don't have the will-power to be a physician.
5. i got nothin for this one.
 
It wasn't an either-or. It makes you sound like a callous s***.
 
No matter how you answer this question it will be misinterpreted, especially by adcoms. They refuse to consider that most pre-meds actually do have some personal integrity.

Really, it's a total bologna question. Why should they care why you want to go into medicine? Half of them shouldn't even be there themselves and many don't like what they do. Maybe their ideals/reasons are f%$&ed up.
 
1. Can you think of a profession that doesn't involve helping people?


Yes. Almost every other job and profession out there doesn't directly help people on a personal level.
 
Yes. Almost every other job and profession out there doesn't directly help people on a personal level.

Agreed...actors, musicians, athletes, salesmen, CEO's --> all in it for themselves. They aren't helping people.
 
Why stop there?

Lawyers (the handful that work on social change/human rights, notwithstanding), architects, waiters, engineers (in most fields), theoretical physicists, assembly line workers, truckers, advertisers, PR people, etc.

Do the fruits of their labor often end up helping people? Sure. But that's not the goal. They're not trying to do good and give back to society, it's simply a side-effect. The idealism of wanting to make the world around you a better place is something that I find important in physicians.
 
Top