hey,
I was not particularly impressed with the program. It seemed very disorganized & to be honest...desperate. The residents were all extremely nice & friendly & welcoming. The faculty was really nice too, so it had nothing to do with the people or staff, but the program just didnt seem very strong. I cant remember the call schedule (sorry) but I remember getting a sense of it being a very hectic place to work. Their motto is clearly you learn by doing which is fine but this seemed to translate into the residents being a source of cheap labor. The residents seemed a little rundown.
The location means that you are mostly seeing the disenfranchised & the minority populations of black & hispanic--I think not so much other minority populations & not really the middle or upper class population. I am not being biased by any means, I am actually very interested in acute psychosis among the homeless & indigent population in my future career, but in my training I want to to make sure to see a whole spectrum of culturally diverse & socioeconomically diverse patients. The residents & faculty said you will mostly see black & hispanic pt's with drug issues, now that I remember it correctly. I understand that this is pychiatry BUT again, I would rather see as much of a mix of things as I can, especially if you are going to work me like a donkey...
Specific to your question, I dont remember psychotherapy really being emphasized-this is the trenches basically. They said fellowships are fine but didnt give any evidence or stats on residents getting them, so I would ask them to be specific about that.
They seemed to really want a US grad- all of the residents are foreign grads & the director who is new in the position but worked there for many years almost beat up the program herself & said they wouldnt rank me unless they knew I would rank them bc they thought I would probably get in elsewhere...that to me is a sign of a weak program.
Also the didactics seemed to be in a state of flux. & they give exams (each year & I think they count for your evals) to prepare you for the boards but this seemed more to make sure their residents were learning throughout their training rather than a tool for the boards. & my opinion was that its bc they work the residents so hard that formal teaching is lacking...
Hope this helps. I didnt mean to paint such a grim picture. There were other very busy commuinty based programs that I thought were superior to this one though...Its a shame bc with the new director the program should have some really good potential, maybe in the future??
You will probably enjoy your day though-its very relaxed & they are fun to talk to. If you get a different impression, let me know! 🙂
My advice is that when you ask a question, get them to tell you specific facts & stats.