- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 7,294
- Reaction score
- 5,498
I feel like common wisdom/advice is to pay off student loans before working on investments. But the math seems to indicate that, within certain confines, maximizing early-career investments pays far greater returns than paying off all of your student loans immediately.
We can take my own case as one example:
~150k in capitalized loans after finishing residency
~200-300k gross income starting (150-235 net)
~60k lifestyle, expenses, etc.
~90k remainder
~60% of my loans are not federal and are subject to a 10-year repayment and, psychologically, I don't like the idea of taking longer than 10 years to pay off my loans. I'll earn too much to benefit from PSLF. To make this first run of the numbers conservative, we'll say my average interest rate is 6.8% (it's not, but that's my modal federal rate.)
To pay off my loans in 10 years, I'd have to contribute about $1750 per month, with leaves $5750 to direct either to paying off the loans more quickly or getting started with investments.
According to this calculator, paying off the loan more quickly will save 46k in interest and pay off the loans in 1.8 years instead of 10 years, whereas investing that amount over the 1.8 years will result in 590k of estimated compound interest over 30 years.
In practical terms for me right now, this has me thinking that I should invest some of my excess income in a tax-deferred account, now that my Roth is fully funded for the year.
Running these calculations with various other extreme cases:
300k loans @ 7% paid off in 10 years (original plan) giving ~2300 to use toward loans vs investments @ 5% x 30 years of interest = investments pay off more in the long run.
300k loans @ 7% initially planned for 20 year repayment with ~4750 to use toward loans vs investments @ 5% x 20 years of interest = investments STILL pay off more in the long run.
Obviously this has to be titrated to actual loan interest rate and risk tolerance for actual expected investment returns, but seems pretty convincing with these conservative estimates that it's more important for early-career physicians to max their investment contributions (especially tax-deferred) prior to increasing their loan prepayment amount, at least with regard to long-term financial benefit.
Am I missing something? Any disagreement?
TL;DR: Investments compounded for 20+ years are more powerful than (appropriately repaid) student loan interest.
We can take my own case as one example:
~150k in capitalized loans after finishing residency
~200-300k gross income starting (150-235 net)
~60k lifestyle, expenses, etc.
~90k remainder
~60% of my loans are not federal and are subject to a 10-year repayment and, psychologically, I don't like the idea of taking longer than 10 years to pay off my loans. I'll earn too much to benefit from PSLF. To make this first run of the numbers conservative, we'll say my average interest rate is 6.8% (it's not, but that's my modal federal rate.)
To pay off my loans in 10 years, I'd have to contribute about $1750 per month, with leaves $5750 to direct either to paying off the loans more quickly or getting started with investments.
According to this calculator, paying off the loan more quickly will save 46k in interest and pay off the loans in 1.8 years instead of 10 years, whereas investing that amount over the 1.8 years will result in 590k of estimated compound interest over 30 years.
In practical terms for me right now, this has me thinking that I should invest some of my excess income in a tax-deferred account, now that my Roth is fully funded for the year.
Running these calculations with various other extreme cases:
300k loans @ 7% paid off in 10 years (original plan) giving ~2300 to use toward loans vs investments @ 5% x 30 years of interest = investments pay off more in the long run.
300k loans @ 7% initially planned for 20 year repayment with ~4750 to use toward loans vs investments @ 5% x 20 years of interest = investments STILL pay off more in the long run.
Obviously this has to be titrated to actual loan interest rate and risk tolerance for actual expected investment returns, but seems pretty convincing with these conservative estimates that it's more important for early-career physicians to max their investment contributions (especially tax-deferred) prior to increasing their loan prepayment amount, at least with regard to long-term financial benefit.
Am I missing something? Any disagreement?
TL;DR: Investments compounded for 20+ years are more powerful than (appropriately repaid) student loan interest.