Ionic or Covalent Stronger

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

reising1

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
289
Reaction score
9
There seems to be lots of disagreement on this topic. And I can't figure out what to know for the MCAT. In general, is Ionic or Covalent stronger? Some people say covalent, some say ionic.

Can anyone reference their review books and check for me? I can't seem to find this in mine.

Members don't see this ad.
 
"The short answer is that they are not always weaker in fact. Some ionic compounds have very strong bonds, while some covalent bonds are quite weak. Usually however, it is easier to break an ionic bond than a covalent one. What determines the actual strength of a bond is quite complex, but let me try to explain the basic principles.
Bonding has everything to do with electrons. In ionic bonds, an element loses an electron to another element. The two elements are then bonded by a force of attraction based on electrostatics, or Coulombic force; it is due to the fact that a positive charge and a negative charge attract each other (like the two opposite ends of a magnet). Since one element has a negative charge and the other has a positive charge they are held together in a bond. I will give an example. Sodium chloride, NaCl, or more commonly known as table salt, is an ionically bonded compound. The sodium, Na, will lose one electron (to form a Na+ ion), and the chlorine, Cl, will gain that electron (to form a Cl- ion). Since an electron has a negative charge, the sodium has a positive charge (lost a negative), and the chlorine has a negative charge (gained a negative). Just like north and south magnets, the two are attracted to each other and are bonded. The bond strength is determined by how much charge each element has. For instance, you can also have ions that have more than one charge. Common ions like this are Mg2+, Fe3+, and O2-. Because each ion has more than one charge, the attraction is even stronger because the Coulombic force is directly related to the size of the charge on each ion.
In covalent bonds, elements share electrons. No electrons are given away or taken completely, but are instead shared between the elements. For example, Nitrogen gas, or N2 is simply two nitrogen atoms bonded together. There is no reason for one N to give an electron to the other one. They both want to hold on to their electrons exactly the same amount! (As opposed to NaCl in the example above, where Cl needs an extra electron, and Na needs to get rid of one to become most stable). The strength of a covalent bond is determined by a complicated set of properties of the atoms involved. What makes a covalent bond weak or strong is really beyond the scope of this discussion. (Briefly, the strength of covalent bonds is related to the nature of the atomic orbitals involved in the bond, specifically the overlay of the orbitals involved in the bond, and the size of the energy difference between the orbitals. If that doesn't make sense, don't worry too much about it... it's complicated stuff!)
In general, ionic bonds are easier to break, but it depends on several factors. For instance, breaking ionic bonds is very easy to do when you dissolve an ionic compound in water. Water is special because it effectively reduces this Coulombic attraction between the plus and minus charges on the ions (it kind of acts like a barrier or shield, blocking the plus from seeing the minus). However, if you were trying to break an ionic bond in a perfect vacuum, it would be much harder (because without something to block the attractive force, it is quite strong). Another thing to consider is that ionic compounds usually form 3-dimensional crystals, where there are many many ionic bonds, whereas covalent bonds tend to be found in isolated molecules (except for network covalent compounds like diamond or silicon). The fact that ionic bonds form a 3-D structure in a crystal makes a huge difference. So part of what makes this question so complicated is that you kind of comparing apples and oranges."
 
"The short answer is that they are not always weaker in fact. Some ionic compounds have very strong bonds, while some covalent bonds are quite weak. Usually however, it is easier to break an ionic bond than a covalent one. What determines the actual strength of a bond is quite complex, but let me try to explain the basic principles.
Bonding has everything to do with electrons. In ionic bonds, an element loses an electron to another element. The two elements are then bonded by a force of attraction based on electrostatics, or Coulombic force; it is due to the fact that a positive charge and a negative charge attract each other (like the two opposite ends of a magnet). Since one element has a negative charge and the other has a positive charge they are held together in a bond. I will give an example. Sodium chloride, NaCl, or more commonly known as table salt, is an ionically bonded compound. The sodium, Na, will lose one electron (to form a Na+ ion), and the chlorine, Cl, will gain that electron (to form a Cl- ion). Since an electron has a negative charge, the sodium has a positive charge (lost a negative), and the chlorine has a negative charge (gained a negative). Just like north and south magnets, the two are attracted to each other and are bonded. The bond strength is determined by how much charge each element has. For instance, you can also have ions that have more than one charge. Common ions like this are Mg2+, Fe3+, and O2-. Because each ion has more than one charge, the attraction is even stronger because the Coulombic force is directly related to the size of the charge on each ion.
In covalent bonds, elements share electrons. No electrons are given away or taken completely, but are instead shared between the elements. For example, Nitrogen gas, or N2 is simply two nitrogen atoms bonded together. There is no reason for one N to give an electron to the other one. They both want to hold on to their electrons exactly the same amount! (As opposed to NaCl in the example above, where Cl needs an extra electron, and Na needs to get rid of one to become most stable). The strength of a covalent bond is determined by a complicated set of properties of the atoms involved. What makes a covalent bond weak or strong is really beyond the scope of this discussion. (Briefly, the strength of covalent bonds is related to the nature of the atomic orbitals involved in the bond, specifically the overlay of the orbitals involved in the bond, and the size of the energy difference between the orbitals. If that doesn't make sense, don't worry too much about it... it's complicated stuff!)
In general, ionic bonds are easier to break, but it depends on several factors. For instance, breaking ionic bonds is very easy to do when you dissolve an ionic compound in water. Water is special because it effectively reduces this Coulombic attraction between the plus and minus charges on the ions (it kind of acts like a barrier or shield, blocking the plus from seeing the minus). However, if you were trying to break an ionic bond in a perfect vacuum, it would be much harder (because without something to block the attractive force, it is quite strong). Another thing to consider is that ionic compounds usually form 3-dimensional crystals, where there are many many ionic bonds, whereas covalent bonds tend to be found in isolated molecules (except for network covalent compounds like diamond or silicon). The fact that ionic bonds form a 3-D structure in a crystal makes a huge difference. So part of what makes this question so complicated is that you kind of comparing apples and oranges."

So if I understand correctly, what this all says is that there is no hard and fast rule and that it would be unfair for MCAT to flat out ask "Which of these bonds is stronger?"
 
I would say so. They would more likely ask you to compare between covalent bonds. Ie HF vs HI.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
HF is stronger because of the hard electron shell around Fluorine. It can pull its electrons in very tightly, so the electron from the hydrogen is sucked in. Hydrogen with a positive charge (a proton) isn't that unstable, obviously, so that's not a huge barrier to breaking the bond. Fluorine anions, however, have a negative charge spread in a very tiny area due to the pulled in electrons. This is rather unstable.

HI is weaker because Iodine has a giant fluffy electron cloud. It can easily hold a negative charge and does so readily. This is also why HI is a much, much, much stronger acid than HF.
 
Apples and Oranges ... There's no reason to think in this level of detail guys. The important distinction between Ionic and Covalent is that in Ionic Bonds, the atoms are charged species (one species basically steals the others electrons due to their distinctive electronegativity difference), where as in Covalent bonds, electrons are shared.

Both covalent and ionic bonds are significantly stronger than intermolecular forces (hydrogen-bonding, dipole-dipole, london dispersion).

You'll never be asked to compare a covalent bond to an ionic bond, unless they incorporated it into a passage with various table data, in which case they'd likely ask you to compare their strength to weaker intermolecular forces.
 
Top