- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
- Messages
- 1,317
- Reaction score
- 9
Ok,
So this morning i was walking to the hospital to go to work and i saw a lot of commotion on the street out front. Apparently a truck has run over a cyclist and the cyclist was lying on the pavement next to the truck with the cops standing next to him talking to the driver.
At least 15-20 doctors (in their white coats) and nurses walk right past this scene on their way in because the staff aprking is on the other side of that street. Each one glanced once at the guy on the ground and kept walking.
What struck me was that not a single one asked the cops about the man's status or why they were just standing there.
I assume that the cops did not want to move him till he was stabilized cos an ambulance arraived 10 mins later, immobilized him on a board and drove him 100 yards into the hospital.
I know an EMT is better equiped to handle that situation but My question is did all those docs make an assesment at one glance that their help was not needed or am i being too idealistic to think that if i had an MD behind my name i would at least check to see if there isnt anything i could do.
Is there any law prohibiting that or is it purely a personal decision?
I have not started med school yet so maybe the idealism has yet to be beaten out of me by the system.
So this morning i was walking to the hospital to go to work and i saw a lot of commotion on the street out front. Apparently a truck has run over a cyclist and the cyclist was lying on the pavement next to the truck with the cops standing next to him talking to the driver.
At least 15-20 doctors (in their white coats) and nurses walk right past this scene on their way in because the staff aprking is on the other side of that street. Each one glanced once at the guy on the ground and kept walking.
What struck me was that not a single one asked the cops about the man's status or why they were just standing there.
I assume that the cops did not want to move him till he was stabilized cos an ambulance arraived 10 mins later, immobilized him on a board and drove him 100 yards into the hospital.
I know an EMT is better equiped to handle that situation but My question is did all those docs make an assesment at one glance that their help was not needed or am i being too idealistic to think that if i had an MD behind my name i would at least check to see if there isnt anything i could do.
Is there any law prohibiting that or is it purely a personal decision?
I have not started med school yet so maybe the idealism has yet to be beaten out of me by the system.