Copied from a post on AM about the new charting outcomes data:
"
40/1086 scored >260 in 2009 (top 3.7% of rads applicants)
vs.
66/919 scored >260 in 2011 (top 7.2% of rads applicants)
191/1086 scored >250 in 2009 (top 17.6% of rads applicants)
vs.
228/919 scored >250 in 2011 (top 24.8% of rads applicants
% AOA: 23.2 (2009) --> 26.4 (2011)
% Top 40 US NIH medical schools: 34.0 (2009) --> 36.7 (2011)
This trend indicates that a 260+ is approximately half as rare as it once was, and in fact reasonably common (7.2% of applicants)
More importantly, this data indicates that one out of every four rads applicants last year scored higher than 250 on step 1, up from 17.6% just two years prior.
What this data suggests overall is that the picture is considerably rosier for individuals attempting to match in radiology period, due to the considerable number of PGY-2 radiology positions available across the U.S., including many community / etc. programs, relative to the recently decreased number of applicants. However, the number of spots in the "top" programs (whatever that means to you) remains fixed, and quantitative metrics of applicant strength (Step 1, etc.) are all drifting upward... so competition there remains as ferocious as ever."
Soooo....looks like its still quite a bit more competitive than Peds.
In the words of Jason Sudekis on SNL, "Summers Eve.......DOUCHE!"