- Joined
- Jul 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,051
- Reaction score
- 4,749
That's quite an idealistic perspective. Sure, for some people, medicine may indeed be a calling and they get a spiritual satisfaction that negates the pains of personal sacrifice. Kudos to them. For most of us, medicine is a profession that demanded rigorous training and specific sacrifice in return for a certain level of compensation. Most of us did not go into medicine to be martyrs. I'd change my career without a second thought if I thought it was causing irreparable damage to my family or anything else I truly value.
Fwiw, the people I know who spoke the most about medicine being a "calling" are the ones I've seen burn out and crash the hardest. Nor have I ever seen a correlation between how much of a "calling" medicine is and competence as a physician. You don't need to have a "calling" to have a strong work ethic, provide top clinical care, and stay abreast of your field.
Psychiatry IS medicine. I might argue that anyone strong in medicine has the potential to be an excellent psychiatrist, but Psychiatry itself selects for people who excel at connecting with patients and arguably knows when *not* to prescribe something. When *not* to hold someone. When *not* to talk.
During our union negotiations, one of the boss MDs reportedly argued he likes to offer line staff low salaries because that helps them recruit doctors who are in it to help people™ and not primarily for $Maybe I'm just burnt out from academia work, but IME, when people keep calling something "a calling, not a job", that's often code for "you should work for free, because it's a calling, after all."
This is absolutely spot-on and very well written. I was/am an idealist and do find medicine is my calling, but there is no way I would let it get in the way of my family which certainly has been the playback of the practice of medicine in the past. I also prioritize a job with average pay but great workflow/hours/flexibility to both enjoy my job and place my family first.I think we have this false dichotomy going. Is it just a job, or is it a calling? I think in our society as currently structured it should be both at once.
If we take a "calling" to mean that we focus only on values of the profession and ignore or heavily minimize self-interest, lots of problems follow. It is easy for employers to exploit us. We can drive ourselves into the ground giving and ignoring our, and even more importantly our family's, needs. We need to recognize that we are highly trained professionals doing something that generates huge economic value, and we need to hold firm boundaries with employers that recognize we will not be forced to practice below our own standards of care, or in a way that leaves us feeling exploited.
I always remember that if my toilet breaks the plumber isn't going to come out for $10/hour because I'm such an awesome, generous dude. As long as I don't get a "doctor discount" on everything in society, I am going to make sure I am getting fairly compensated for my own family's wellbeing.
But that doesn't mean dropping off relevant values. Even if you are a janitor in the hospital, viewing your job through a lens of purpose means a lot. You can see yourself as an important member of the team, making patient stays more pleasant, helping prevent infection, helping staff work in a pleasant environment, etc. The person who truly internalizes that will likely get deeper satisfaction from that job than they would just clocking in and clocking out. That person can also show up feeling good about pushing to do the best job they can rather than seething with resentment at being forced to sell away the hours of their life for money. In the same way we need to connect with the purpose in the deeply human enterprise of helping another suffering human being get well, or at least decrease their suffering. While we are being paid for what we do, it doesn't negate the meaning of it.
I also think the two feed on each other. A purpose-driven, passionate doctor is going to be worth more to employers and patients. A financially intelligent doctor with good boundaries is going to be less burned out, feel less taken advantage of, and feel more emotionally charged to show up and do a good job.
I think once we view the job/calling debate as a false dichotomy we can start looking at how we maximize our work as psychiatrists viewing this as a job and a calling.
What specialty is she in, out of curiosity?This is absolutely spot-on and very well written. I was/am an idealist and do find medicine is my calling, but there is no way I would let it get in the way of my family which certainly has been the playback of the practice of medicine in the past. I also prioritize a job with average pay but great workflow/hours/flexibility to both enjoy my job and place my family first.
I really enjoy a week long vacation but am fairly excited to get back to work after a week. I know it's different for some of my colleagues and there is nothing wrong with that as long as they provide great care. My partner finds medicine to be far less of a calling than I do, but provides excellent care and goes above and beyond her colleagues in diligence on a daily basis. I love her for it and would not have married her if that wasn't the case, but I am under no illusion that she finds the same level of intellectual or human fulfillment as I do. My next hurdle is supporting her stepping back from full-time work in her early 40's or moving away from medicine entirely once we can easily afford for her to do so.
She is a specialty surgeon, not comfortable specifying which one. Can DM me if you think we know each other 😛What specialty is she in, out of curiosity?
Was just wondering if she might be in a higher burnout specialty!She is a specialty surgeon, not comfortable specifying which one. Can DM me if you think we know each other 😛
Would totally agree with the idea that ideally it needs to be a balance of both and to be very aware that others will try to exploit your ideals of this as a "calling" to get you to do more with less. "Professionalism" is also another weasel word that ends up getting tossed around a bunch to get doctors to do more or work more for less.
For instance, take a look at how it worked out for these poor "professionals" who got bullied into continuing to show up for work after their group stopped making payroll:
Mostly or all in California, but apparently sent an email to their doctors that they are not going to make payroll for them this month and they will catch up in the next few months. Worth the discussion and light of what happened to a PP, envision bankruptcy, etc. Can’t imagine how bad your finances have to be that you miss payroll makes you wonder if you missed or stop paying your rent or other mandatory expenses as I would imagine missing payroll will be the last thing you wanna do because if I was a physician there, I certainly would not show up to work another shift and expose myself...
- EctopicFetus
- Replies: 85
- Forum: Emergency Medicine
To suits everything is a calling. It's a calling of the greenbacks, the moolah, the cheddah, the bandz, the cabbage, the Benjamin's, the scratch, the the loot, you know... the calling.Funny how "it's a calling" to suits who never experience being called on call at 2 am for the 5th time.
Yes she certainly is. She also is well reimbursed for it and knew what she was getting into. The tax system doesn't exactly reward making 2x money for y years versus 1x money for 2y years, but we don't have expensive tastes and I make a solid salary. Weill see when she hits the decade mark of attendinghood in 3 years what she decides to do as we should be at chubbyFIRE by that point.Was just wondering if she might be in a higher burnout specialty!
Lol, chubbyFIREYes she certainly is. She also is well reimbursed for it and knew what she was getting into. The tax system doesn't exactly reward making 2x money for y years versus 1x money for 2y years, but we don't have expensive tastes and I make a solid salary. Weill see when she hits the decade mark of attendinghood in 3 years what she decides to do as we should be at chubbyFIRE by that point.
Oh man, let me tell you a story when I started discussing chubby travel with my partner. She was very confused and a bit concerned even though she understand that she was involved with it. When the explanation starts with "you see Fat means, so chubby...".Lol, chubbyFIRE![]()
Wow now I realized why I *like* so many of your posts - I think you're me. Similar age, spouse in a surgical field (well, IM but the most surgical / procedural subspecialty of it) with similar feelings about medicine, enjoying vacations but excited to come back to work etc. My wife already cut back to 80% and will probably cut back more. I think we can FatFIRE or maybe even chubby it in the next five years if she pushes hard at work, but with kids growing and all that, better for us to slow things down for a while so we can spend more time with them now.This is absolutely spot-on and very well written. I was/am an idealist and do find medicine is my calling, but there is no way I would let it get in the way of my family which certainly has been the playback of the practice of medicine in the past. I also prioritize a job with average pay but great workflow/hours/flexibility to both enjoy my job and place my family first.
I really enjoy a week long vacation but am fairly excited to get back to work after a week. I know it's different for some of my colleagues and there is nothing wrong with that as long as they provide great care. My partner finds medicine to be far less of a calling than I do, but provides excellent care and goes above and beyond her colleagues in diligence on a daily basis. I love her for it and would not have married her if that wasn't the case, but I am under no illusion that she finds the same level of intellectual or human fulfillment as I do. My next hurdle is supporting her stepping back from full-time work in her early 40's or moving away from medicine entirely once we can easily afford for her to do so.
I have long since come to the realization that a $4million dollar home on the beach in Hawaii is not going to buy the same happiness that my spouse would get having more time with our child. I've heard enough people tell you to enjoy the time (even though it can be awfully challenging at times) to know that we need to savor these years. We will be just fine with less income, but it's certainly coming from a place of significant financial diligence to have this flexibility in the first place.Wow now I realized why I *like* so many of your posts - I think you're me. Similar age, spouse in a surgical field (well, IM but the most surgical / procedural subspecialty of it) with similar feelings about medicine, enjoying vacations but excited to come back to work etc. My wife already cut back to 80% and will probably cut back more. I think we can FatFIRE or maybe even chubby it in the next five years if she pushes hard at work, but with kids growing and all that, better for us to slow things down for a while so we can spend more time with them now.
Yes she certainly is. She also is well reimbursed for it and knew what she was getting into. The tax system doesn't exactly reward making 2x money for y years versus 1x money for 2y years, but we don't have expensive tastes and I make a solid salary. Weill see when she hits the decade mark of attendinghood in 3 years what she decides to do as we should be at chubbyFIRE by that point.
Just under 4 now, 6M (5m liquid) would be a chubbyfire number for us. With an expected 40+ years of retirement would expect around 3% withdrawal rate. Of course I would keep working and that number would then grow, but who knows what the future will bring.Congrats! 2-3M NW?
Just under 4 now, 6M (5m liquid) would be a chubbyfire number for us. With an expected 40+ years of retirement would expect around 3% withdrawal rate. Of course I would keep working and that number would then grow, but who knows what the future will bring.
I hate talking about it, but I'm officially losing my youth this year and turning 40. I am just hitting 8 years of being an attending, 7 for my SO. Net worth was approx -200k coming out of training. Her income did a lot of the heavy lifting as does living a modest life (although I feel I live pretty large on around 125k year spending in a MCoL area).Impressive, do you mind me asking how old you are? How many years it took for you guys to hit 4M?
Damn, makes me jealous of the dual physician households. Our net worth was probably -$50k when I came out of training and I was non-trad, so got a later start on attending salary than a lot of people. My goal was to have net worth of >$1m by 40yo, but probably won't hit that with an academic salary and a single income household, even in our relatively LCoL area.I hate talking about it, but I'm officially losing my youth this year and turning 40. I am just hitting 8 years of being an attending, 7 for my SO. Net worth was approx -200k coming out of training. Her income did a lot of the heavy lifting as does living a modest life (although I feel I live pretty large on around 125k year spending in a MCoL area).
Yes she certainly is. She also is well reimbursed for it and knew what she was getting into. The tax system doesn't exactly reward making 2x money for y years versus 1x money for 2y years, but we don't have expensive tastes and I make a solid salary. Weill see when she hits the decade mark of attendinghood in 3 years what she decides to do as we should be at chubbyFIRE by that point.
As someone that fits that description currently (actually worse because wife went back to school and we paid tuition) it is 100% possible. I’m 3 years out of residency and went from a negative net worth to over $300k a few months ago with about 3/4 of that in accounts while working in academia (<$300k/yr). I expect my net worth to be around $700k by the time I hit 40.To give some hope to those single income doc households , do u think had ur wife been a sahm with 1 kiddo, would you be close to 1m nw by age 40 or is that not realistic unless u were single without a family?
I hate talking about it, but I'm officially losing my youth this year and turning 40. I am just hitting 8 years of being an attending, 7 for my SO. Net worth was approx -200k coming out of training. Her income did a lot of the heavy lifting as does living a modest life (although I feel I live pretty large on around 125k year spending in a MCoL area).
I'll be honest, if I had a SAH partner with a kid, I would have been out there grinding. I was a dog when I was 30 and would have worked 60 hours/week and cleared 500k for sure. I actually saved all my time off from the 2nd year of fellowship to graduate training 3 weeks early and start my attending job to get 3 weeks of a double paycheck (I really wanted to pay off my loans, I have a very debt adverse mindset). I could do 24 hour shifts with a lot less bother than my peers in residency (this would be now wildly untenable for me with a child that has chronic sleep issues now).To give some hope to those single income doc households , do u think had ur wife been a sahm with 1 kiddo, would you be close to 1m nw by age 40 or is that not realistic unless u were single without a family?
As someone that fits that description currently (actually worse because wife went back to school and we paid tuition) it is 100% possible. I’m 3 years out of residency and went from a negative net worth to over $300k a few months ago with about 3/4 of that in accounts while working in academia (<$300k/yr). I expect my net worth to be around $700k by the time I hit 40.
So can it be done? Definitely. It does depend on your situation and career choices though. If you want to work in academia in NYC or LA, buy a big, expensive house (or a house at all in those locations), drive a nice car and take regular vacations, its not going to happen. If you take a job making $350k+ and live modestly in a moderate or low CoL area where you can save $80k+ per year, it should be very possible. It really just depends on your choices and how you want to balance work with lifestyle.
I'll be honest, if I had a SAH partner with a kid, I would have been out there grinding. I was a dog when I was 30 and would have worked 60 hours/week and cleared 500k for sure. I actually saved all my time off from the 2nd year of fellowship to graduate training 3 weeks early and start my attending job to get 3 weeks of a double paycheck (I really wanted to pay off my loans, I have a very debt adverse mindset). I could do 24 hour shifts with a lot less bother than my peers in residency (this would be now wildly untenable for me with a child that has chronic sleep issues now).
So yes for me it would not have been hard to be at 1 mill NW at 40 in the area I live in now. My friend is just turning 40 as a hospitalist, so 2 years less of training but slightly lower salary and with 1 child (the 2nd was recently born) I believe the 1 mil NW is still quite a ways off. They spend about as much as we do though despite us earning triple their take home.
So true. I grinded hard during residency - we had pretty good moonlighting opportunities starting PGY2 year, so I and many other residents would routinely hit 80+ hours a week (shhh don't tell the GME office) hustling up dough. Most of us residents that did that, were also financially "savvy" (ie, saving a lot and investing, mostly in index funds, paying down student loans etc) so if you can curtail lifestyle spending for a few years, the compounding growth is massive. Granted, the shifts were all night, weekend etc, stringing together multiple shifts so we would be working 30+ hours in a row (again don't tell GME!) but I don't think I could ever do that kind of work now with kids at home and (mostly) wanting to spend time with them on the weekend, despite getting 2-3x the pay now.Those first 5 years of attendinghood may be the most important financially of your life. The doctor house, nice cars, vacations/trips are all in high demand after a 12 year mostly delayed gratification.
Wish it was taught more in residency but the system really wants you in the game as long as possible. I think we'd be seeing a lot of sub 50 part timers if people really knew the importance of those first 5 years of attendhood and investing.
So true. I grinded hard during residency - we had pretty good moonlighting opportunities starting PGY2 year, so I and many other residents would routinely hit 80+ hours a week (shhh don't tell the GME office) hustling up dough. Most of us residents that did that, were also financially "savvy" (ie, saving a lot and investing, mostly in index funds, paying down student loans etc) so if you can curtail lifestyle spending for a few years, the compounding growth is massive. Granted, the shifts were all night, weekend etc, stringing together multiple shifts so we would be working 30+ hours in a row (again don't tell GME!) but I don't think I could ever do that kind of work now with kids at home and (mostly) wanting to spend time with them on the weekend, despite getting 2-3x the pay now.
I don't think you have to "live like a resident" exactly when you're an attending, and its OK to loosen the belt a bit but not 100% if you want real wealth. We loosened up a good amount when I started doing more moonlighting, and more when my wife became an attending. But we only increased our spending by 1.5x - 2x, even though our income went up like 3-5x. But that spending increase felt huge - simple things like being OK with getting the drinks at a restaurant instead of just water etc whereas we would always skimp before.
Also finding contentment... I still feel like a baller now that I add the guac to my chipotle order without thinking about the cost, and I'm happy with that being my financial goal in a sense. But I know a lot of people that just keep escalating their wants and it leads to never finding contentment,.
Ah yes, Chipotle rich, the standard for when you’ve finally “made it”. Adam Devine has a great little stand up bit on this. Link below, but warning for f bombs aplenty.So true. I grinded hard during residency - we had pretty good moonlighting opportunities starting PGY2 year, so I and many other residents would routinely hit 80+ hours a week (shhh don't tell the GME office) hustling up dough. Most of us residents that did that, were also financially "savvy" (ie, saving a lot and investing, mostly in index funds, paying down student loans etc) so if you can curtail lifestyle spending for a few years, the compounding growth is massive. Granted, the shifts were all night, weekend etc, stringing together multiple shifts so we would be working 30+ hours in a row (again don't tell GME!) but I don't think I could ever do that kind of work now with kids at home and (mostly) wanting to spend time with them on the weekend, despite getting 2-3x the pay now.
I don't think you have to "live like a resident" exactly when you're an attending, and its OK to loosen the belt a bit but not 100% if you want real wealth. We loosened up a good amount when I started doing more moonlighting, and more when my wife became an attending. But we only increased our spending by 1.5x - 2x, even though our income went up like 3-5x. But that spending increase felt huge - simple things like being OK with getting the drinks at a restaurant instead of just water etc whereas we would always skimp before.
Also finding contentment... I still feel like a baller now that I add the guac to my chipotle order without thinking about the cost, and I'm happy with that being my financial goal in a sense. But I know a lot of people that just keep escalating their wants and it leads to never finding contentment,.
Good for you man!As someone that fits that description currently (actually worse because wife went back to school and we paid tuition) it is 100% possible. I’m 3 years out of residency and went from a negative net worth to over $300k a few months ago with about 3/4 of that in accounts while working in academia (<$300k/yr). I expect my net worth to be around $700k by the time I hit 40.
So can it be done? Definitely. It does depend on your situation and career choices though. If you want to work in academia in NYC or LA, buy a big, expensive house (or a house at all in those locations), drive a nice car and take regular vacations, its not going to happen. If you take a job making $350k+ and live modestly in a moderate or low CoL area where you can save $80k+ per year, it should be very possible. It really just depends on your choices and how you want to balance work with lifestyle.
Ah yes, Chipotle rich, the standard for when you’ve finally “made it”. Adam Devine has a great little stand up bit on this. Link below, but warning for f bombs aplenty.