ortho2003 said:
Honestly, does it really matter. I am willing to bet that if you took a poll on the streets, far more people would recognize the term ER than ED. For an article such as this written for the public, it is quite appropriate to use the term ER, which everyone will recognize. As far as the industry standard, that industry stadard is only among ER docs. Most other physicians, who are also part of the "industry" of medicine, including myself, use the terms interchangably.
I realize 'ER' is the term people recognize in the public at large, which is why I made the distinction between 'popular culture' and the 'industry term.' And I never suggested it wasn't the right term for the NYT to use in the article. Naturally I'm not going to suggest I know better than the
New York Times, so to be honest I'm a little annoyed (in that tiny little way that Internet misunderstandings make people crazy) at your suggestion that's what I was doing.
This here is a series of message boards for healthcare-type people, and the nice gentleperson with the ID of 'freelancewriter' was coming in to share something interesting.
Seeing this person isn't a posting machine, and figuring he/she might be, oh I dunno, a
writer, I thought it might be a gesture of thanks for the article to point out a little word-nerd sort of handy factoid. I know several writers myself, so I know how it's cool to know little details other people don't have a reason to know. And now you're saying it's not important, there is no such term except among EM docs, etc. Which, all due respect for the professional behind the words, is a lame thing to say.
If you're a working physician who refers to his/her Emergency Medicine colleagues as "ER Docs," or the field as "ER," then everyone knows what you mean, but I'm willing to bet there are at least a few who think you either don't know or don't care that there's a more precise and correct term.
Kind of like when 'Ortho-' and 'Osteo-' are used interchangably.