Kaplan Lecture notes-pathology

[stretch210]

---

Members don't see this ad.

What is everyone's thought on these path lecture notes?

Is this enough as a primary source (with first aid of course)? As opposed to using Goljan RR or BRS. They notes are organized so much "cleaner" than that of Goljan and BRS, but there seems to be much less content...who's used them, who's heard about them...and what are your thoughts?

Thanks

 

[kito]

No this is a lousy book. There is absolutely no excuse or reason to use it when you have BRS or RR for pathology.

 

[ssg]

I tried reading this book but like you said it has hardly any information in it compared to goljan's notes or BRS. I wouldn't bother if i were you. Path is too important to screw up.