Not sure anyone follows college ball but if you want to see an open fx, google duke vs Louisville injury..
May take your mind off the residency crisis at least
May take your mind off the residency crisis at least
Not sure anyone follows college ball but if you want to see an open fx, google duke vs Louisville injury..
May take your mind off the residency crisis at least
podiatrists technically have scope up to the tibial tuberosity in many states, but there may be qualifiers on that statement. for example in WA, you can do anything up to the tibial tuberosity IF the condition you're treating actually involves bone or soft tissue around the talo-crural joint and/or foot.Me and some other DMU '17s were discussing this earlier today: in at least one state, this would fall under the scope of a podiatrist, right? I'm not sure how many pods would jump on this leg issue, but would it be legal? I delved into many online and SDN searches and everyone liked using the word "ankle" and on occasion "leg." But with no formal definition of the tibia/fibula here, I don't know how much a pod can do (in even the most generous states...).
I mean hell, I even found one daring podiatrist that claims podiatrists "treat conditions associated with the foot, ankle, and sometimes knee, leg and hip."
I've seen and done some funky stuff in the office, hospital and O.R. and that injury even gave ME the "willies".