kfsreview Vs. DAT achiever
Started by joooj86
I'd say DAT Achiever, it's a more polished product and very useful for PAT.
I think DAT Achiever is worth your choice... It will make you work harder in Sciences and more importantly get you prepared for the worse in the real PAT. RCT seems easier but it has a stock passage very similar to the real test. If you've not done so, you should download it from the following link and take a look at its DEMO:
http://www.3tquest.com/page2.html
All the best for your coming test 🙂
http://www.3tquest.com/page2.html
All the best for your coming test 🙂
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
devan_smith said:
I've been ignoring the reading comp...any chance you could tell me which test has the stock passage and if there are any other that are similar? Much thanks if you could. 🙂
mochafreak said:
It's Passage 2 in Reading Comprehension Test 2. It's not word for word in exactness, but pretty close. For instance, in the real test, the first formula uses NSP (Net Price Per Share) = Total Earning/Total Share On Hand, but Achiever uses EPS (Earnings Per Share) = Company's Profits/Outstanding Shares. So much I could recall from my first take of the DAT for the reading, and hopes this helps to a certain extent.
