The advancements in the surgical field has been profound during recent decades. What once was a relevant knowledge area might not be that today. Since the old docs are the one that are supposed to teach the younger, it might be a knowledge/teaching delay. Or am I wrong? It might be so that the old docs are very dynamic in their teaching, but I guess some of them still teach what they once was taught, with just a little modification.
Do you feel there is any knowledge gap in a specific area that most surgeons lack, that you now realize would have 'made your life easier' if you knew better?
The question came up when I talked to a neurosurgeon attending, when he was in medical school it was "get out from medical school and come here learn how to handle a scalpel", while he thought we should become "masters of basic science".
For clarity, I'm a MS1 (hence not that used to being taught clinical science) and not from an english-speaking country, so there might be some errors.
Do you feel there is any knowledge gap in a specific area that most surgeons lack, that you now realize would have 'made your life easier' if you knew better?
The question came up when I talked to a neurosurgeon attending, when he was in medical school it was "get out from medical school and come here learn how to handle a scalpel", while he thought we should become "masters of basic science".
For clarity, I'm a MS1 (hence not that used to being taught clinical science) and not from an english-speaking country, so there might be some errors.
Last edited: