Karen Lynch stepping in...
thoughts?
CVS Health Tops Q3 Earnings Forecast, Lifts 2020 Outlook: CEO Larry Merlo To Retire
thoughts?
CVS Health Tops Q3 Earnings Forecast, Lifts 2020 Outlook: CEO Larry Merlo To Retire
LoL at the pharmacists who think working conditions will be better after Larry Merlo's retirement.
The problems for pharmacists are caused by THEMSELVES (saturation), not by big wigs in corporations. Expect wages, hours cuts and metrics increases to continue.
IMO it's going to go the other way if you install a non-pharmacist as CEO. Advocacy for pharmacy "top of license" activities will be completely dismantled because it is EXACTLY as you say - there will be a renewed focus on maximizing the bottom line, not funding activities to further the profession of pharmacy. There will be an even less appreciation for what pharmacists do or CAN do, so the question of "why can't we just replace pharmacists with techs" will have a bigger trickle down effect in rhe organization if you don't have pharmacist advocates at the c-suite level. That's where the real impact is going to be. As for the funding of pharmacy schools, that is still going to happen because 1. it's a tax writeoff and 2. it ensures a cheap labor pipeline so for strategic reasons you wouldn't want to get rid of it.I largely agree with you. I will say however there is a very slim chance that by having a fellow non-pharmacist out of the position of power, it’s one less fellow pharmacist in a position of influence shooting ourselves in the foot. Maybe she’ll be less supportive of donations to pharmacy schools, maybe she will be more willing to give because she can’t rationalize the hardship without being in their shoes at one point.
probably not on all those things but cvs health, or cvs caremark or cvs pharmacy leadership has always historically been of the frugal retail operator mindset because margin and bottom line are king. In the insurance business where margins are often capped in many lines of business and contracts...the top line can reign supreme which brings on a very different culture and mindset. Once she works to get the debt levels in line I’ll be eager to see what she starts doing with the cash. If they keep the dividend frozen where it is, they could start generating a lot or even be more lenient on expense and view it as a top line growth driver.
IMO it's going to go the other way if you install a non-pharmacist as CEO. Advocacy for pharmacy "top of license" activities will be completely dismantled because it is EXACTLY as you say - there will be a renewed focus on maximizing the bottom line, not funding activities to further the profession of pharmacy. There will be an even less appreciation for what pharmacists do or CAN do, so the question of "why can't we just replace pharmacists with techs" will have a bigger trickle down effect in rhe organization if you don't have pharmacist advocates at the c-suite level. That's where the real impact is going to be. As for the funding of pharmacy schools, that is still going to happen because 1. it's a tax writeoff and 2. it ensures a cheap labor pipeline so for strategic reasons you wouldn't want to get rid of it.
One hundred percent agree with you.
CVS was the only major retailer actually run by a pharmacist.
I don't know how anyone can expect things to get better for pharmacists now that we have a CEO from outside of the pharmacy world.
Look at Walgreens. They are far more blatant for their general disdain for pharmacists than CVS is. The PIC answers to the ... Store manager. Laughable. Walgreens led the way with salary freezes and layoffs, and has been leading the way with lowering entry level salaries and restricting new hires to floater positions.
CVS is now an insurance company first and a pharmacy retailer second. The retail side is the fat, and will be trimmed accordingly.
Yeah. The corollary is that even with Trump's corporate tax cuts, pharmacist wages/hours are still being cut. So what makes anyone think that Biden's tax increase on companies will reverse that trend? LoLCompanies love it when they can blame the democrats for the "need" to cut hours, salary freezes, etc. Think of how much worse CVS has gotten in the past 4 years and tell me with a straight face that Biden vs Trump mattered even 1 iota for the pharmacist's job prospects, wages, or working conditions.
Yeah. The corollary is that even with Trump's corporate tax cuts, pharmacist wages/hours are still being cut. So what makes anyone think that Biden's tax increase on companies will reverse that trend? LoL