Then enlighten me. If its so serious, surely taking 90 seconds out of your day is worth it.
Because here's what I think. I think you're one of those people (SDN has a lot of them) who things that everything even remotely connected to medicine should be under the control of physicians. The problem with that is: first, we've shown that the majority of physicians suck at leadership roles; second, its a better use of our time to actually be seeing patients; third, there are certain areas where it just doesn't make sense for physicians to have major involvement.
Does it make sense for us to be involved in hospital management: yes, of course. Someone at the admin meetings needs to present the physicians' perspective. Should the same be true of insurance companies? That one is trickier. Anyone who practices medicine knows that lots of us are bad about just ordering lots of tests either because the patient wants them or because they're lazy. Physicians suck at controlling costs, we're just not taught to think that way. Should we be in charge of the NRMP? In my opinion no. Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't see the benefit. Its a company whose purpose is to house the Match algorithm, nothing more. There might be logic in having a medical student member, kinda like the AMA but as a practicing physician I don't see what I could offer the NRMP other than "when I went through the Match 10 years ago..." and given how much has changed since then that's of very limited value.