- Joined
- Nov 18, 2010
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 2
Hello all,
I am preparing for post-bacc applications that open in February, and most programs only require 1 or 2 letters. Berkeley Extended Ed, however, requires three. I already have my strong letter coming from a professor I do psychological research under, and another from a social worker at a psychiatric hospital I volunteer at, but am having trouble with a third. I have been searching for a doctor to shadow (with little luck) and there isn't enough time to begin volunteering at a clinic to get a rec in time.
For this, I was wondering how credible having a sibling/family member write one of your letters may be. My brother is a 2nd year med student at Penn, and he knows me, my dedication, and my accomplishments pretty well. He has the experience as a med student to make an evaluation about my chances of succeeding in the medical field. I, of course, wouldn't resort to this unless I absolutely didn't find a 3rd candidate, because I imagine a family's perspective may appear biased to the panel.
Any thoughts? Thanks!
I am preparing for post-bacc applications that open in February, and most programs only require 1 or 2 letters. Berkeley Extended Ed, however, requires three. I already have my strong letter coming from a professor I do psychological research under, and another from a social worker at a psychiatric hospital I volunteer at, but am having trouble with a third. I have been searching for a doctor to shadow (with little luck) and there isn't enough time to begin volunteering at a clinic to get a rec in time.
For this, I was wondering how credible having a sibling/family member write one of your letters may be. My brother is a 2nd year med student at Penn, and he knows me, my dedication, and my accomplishments pretty well. He has the experience as a med student to make an evaluation about my chances of succeeding in the medical field. I, of course, wouldn't resort to this unless I absolutely didn't find a 3rd candidate, because I imagine a family's perspective may appear biased to the panel.
Any thoughts? Thanks!