- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all,
I'm getting ready to apply to Washington U and I was just checking out the letters of rec requirements. On their instructions site, it says:
"In general we require three letters of recommendation. The letters should come from three teachers at a college or university you attended who know you well enough to write on your behalf. These teachers should be asked to provide in-depth evaluations of your accomplishments, skills, talents and character rather than mere recapitulations of your academic achievement or grades in their course(s). At least one of these individuals should teach in the sciences." (There's no max so I can have many more on top of these three)
So here's my question: would it be reasonable to interpret that as requiring letters from *any* teacher, or do I absolutely need to have taken their class?
Right now I have lined up (from last year's application process, which I didn't complete because I took a year off) 3 letters from PIs (research-related), 2 from instructors, and 1 personal/work (from a quadriplegic I worked for as a PCA). All three of the PI's are instructors at my university, but I wasn't in any of their classes (actually I did audit a class taught by one of them last semester but I don't think it's worth it to ask him to point that out in his letter). I really don't have another teacher I could go to for a letter that would say anything more than "yeah she got an A in my class." So is this enough or are the admissions people going to think I don't know how to follow directions if I don't have letters from three people who taught me?
Thanks for your input!
I'm getting ready to apply to Washington U and I was just checking out the letters of rec requirements. On their instructions site, it says:
"In general we require three letters of recommendation. The letters should come from three teachers at a college or university you attended who know you well enough to write on your behalf. These teachers should be asked to provide in-depth evaluations of your accomplishments, skills, talents and character rather than mere recapitulations of your academic achievement or grades in their course(s). At least one of these individuals should teach in the sciences." (There's no max so I can have many more on top of these three)
So here's my question: would it be reasonable to interpret that as requiring letters from *any* teacher, or do I absolutely need to have taken their class?
Right now I have lined up (from last year's application process, which I didn't complete because I took a year off) 3 letters from PIs (research-related), 2 from instructors, and 1 personal/work (from a quadriplegic I worked for as a PCA). All three of the PI's are instructors at my university, but I wasn't in any of their classes (actually I did audit a class taught by one of them last semester but I don't think it's worth it to ask him to point that out in his letter). I really don't have another teacher I could go to for a letter that would say anything more than "yeah she got an A in my class." So is this enough or are the admissions people going to think I don't know how to follow directions if I don't have letters from three people who taught me?
Thanks for your input!