Ok, maybe saying that they were "equal" isn't putting it right. I guess I just don't want anyone getting the wrong impression when they hear that a school is a "lower tier" or "less competetive" school. I personally didn't get interviews at NYMC and Albany, but I did get interviews at, for example, BU and Georgetown. And I saw this happen A LOT. It was amazing to see people get interviews and acceptances at the best schools in the country, just to find out that they didn't even get interviewed at some of the schools on many of these "lower tier" lists. Does it mean that someone with lower stats won't get an interview? Absolutely not. Schools with lower stats just mean that you have a better shot at these places.
Basically, like you will see time and time again on this website, the whole thing is a CRAPSHOOT. There is no rhyme and reason to this process. If you have lower or average stats, don't apply to the top schools. Apply to schools that will give you a better chance, but don't always expect anything based on the stats. I saw too many people get unpleasantly surprised when they didn't even get interviews at places that they had thought they would because the schools had the "lower tier" or "less competetive" label. Thats pretty much it. (and refer back to my comments on the regional stuff)