Anyways, my point is (after all my rambling)... that even though lingualized teeth exhibit better esthetics, there are certain indications for using monoplane, no matter how much better the lingualized teeth may look. What I have also found, is that most denture patients are so happy to just have teeth, many of them wouldn't know the difference between lingualized and monoplane... they are happy to smile and eat again.
While removable is many times a "religious" discussion rather than one of hard science, I will do my best to back up my experience and understanding of literature with evidence.
Note: your justification of monoplane occlusion is spot on correct in your post, however, the two cases you listed are prime examples of when to use a non-anatomic occlusion (1. variable/non-repeatable centric position, 2. extreme parafunction). I do take a little issue with your last statement about patients just being happy with teeth. I find that MOST patients are esthetically and phonetically aware... in fact, I feel much more comfortable when a patient tells me up front that they would like their teeth to look a certain way, rather than "doc, just do your best because I don't care how they look or work."
Monoplane works just fine, but are darn ugly and are less efficient. For a good summary, see the pics I posted. Note: Neutrocentric = Monoplane
1st Table ref: Rhan AO, Heartwell CM. Textbook of Complete Dentures. 5th Ed, 1993.
2nd/3rd table ref: Becker CM, Swoope CC, Guckes AD. Lingualized occlusion for removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1977 Dec;38(6):601-8.
Further more:
A Contemporary article:
Sutton AF, McCord JF. A randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic, lingualized, and zero-degree posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 May;97(5):292-8.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is a lack of evidence to recommend a particular type of posterior occlusal form for conventional complete dentures. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare subject satisfaction with 3 types of posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures in a randomized cross-over controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each participant (n=45), 3 sets of complete dentures were fabricated, each of which had a different posterior occlusal form (0-degree, anatomic, and lingualized). Each set was worn for 8 weeks in a randomized order. Subjective data were collected using the Oral Health Impact Profile 20-EDENT (OHIP-EDENT). The Wilcoxon statistical test was used to compare differences between the groups (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Lingualized posterior occlusal forms were perceived to be significantly superior in terms of painful aching in the mouth (P=.01), sore spots (P<.001), eating ability (P=.02), and meal interruptions (P=.008), compared with 0-degree posterior occlusal forms. Subjects with anatomic posterior occlusal forms had significantly fewer problems eating (P=.05) compared with 0-degree posterior occlusal forms. There was no significant difference found between the lingualized and anatomic posterior occlusal forms. CONCLUSIONS: Participants provided with complete dentures having lingualized or anatomic posterior occlusal forms exhibited significantly higher levels of self-perceived satisfaction compared to those with 0-degree posterior occlusal forms.
A Classic article:
Clough HE, Knodle JM, Leeper SH, Pudwill ML, Taylor DT. A comparison of lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Aug;50(2):176-9.
Summary: Two sets of dentures, one with lingualized occlusion and the other with monoplane occlusion, were made for each of 30 edentulous patients. Sixty-seven percent of those people preferred the lingualized occlusal scheme because of improved masticatory ability, comfort, and esthetics.
-----
According to Parr and Ivanhoe : Lingualized occlusion is "an occlusion for all reasons." (Parr GR, Ivanhoe JR. Lingualized occlusion. An occlusion for all reasons. Dent Clin North Am. 1996 Jan;40(1):103-12.)
I'd venture to say that it's an occlusion for
most reasons... there are some cases that call for anatomical teeth and others that call for monoplane. Myself, however, I always go with lingualized at first and vary occlusion based upon presentation factors such as those listed in the tables.