- Joined
- Oct 24, 2007
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Post Doc
In discussion with a social worker tonight, she told me about a case in another state where a dog owner broke up his two unaltered (& papered) Pit Bulls while they were attacking his third dog, an older Husky.
The Husky's collar was apparently caught on the owner's fence and the other two dogs marred the poor Husky who couldn't get away. The owner, a police officer, and the Husky were pretty badly wounded. This was the second time the Pit Bulls attacked the Husky when the female Pit Bull was in heat. The SW knew about the case because there is a 6-mo baby in this family. The owner's solution to this problem is to have the pit bulls spayed/neutered, and that he is otherwise 'in control of his animals' and 'outsiders are just stereotyping against Pit Bulls', using the any-dog-can-bite argument. Although the dogs live in separated areas from the family, still the SW feels this poses a threat. As an outsider, I agree with the SW.
As veterinarians & students, do you have mandatory reporting to an animal protection agency for cases like this where dogs, like the Husky, may be considered in danger given the repeated attacks? (Or is it, dogs will be dogs?)
Likewise, even though a child was not threatened an incident, are you required to report this type of information to child protective services given this could be considered an early warning sign. What is your role?
The Husky's collar was apparently caught on the owner's fence and the other two dogs marred the poor Husky who couldn't get away. The owner, a police officer, and the Husky were pretty badly wounded. This was the second time the Pit Bulls attacked the Husky when the female Pit Bull was in heat. The SW knew about the case because there is a 6-mo baby in this family. The owner's solution to this problem is to have the pit bulls spayed/neutered, and that he is otherwise 'in control of his animals' and 'outsiders are just stereotyping against Pit Bulls', using the any-dog-can-bite argument. Although the dogs live in separated areas from the family, still the SW feels this poses a threat. As an outsider, I agree with the SW.
As veterinarians & students, do you have mandatory reporting to an animal protection agency for cases like this where dogs, like the Husky, may be considered in danger given the repeated attacks? (Or is it, dogs will be dogs?)
Likewise, even though a child was not threatened an incident, are you required to report this type of information to child protective services given this could be considered an early warning sign. What is your role?
Last edited: