- Joined
- Apr 28, 2012
- Messages
- 252
- Reaction score
- 50
I loved both of these places on my interview trail, and I was wondering if anyone could help me compare/contrast. Really the only things I wasn't thrilled before my interviews were the multiple sites at UM and the large amount of time spent in nurseries at Mayo. However, Masonic is awesome and it seems like residents get more autonomy at the other sites so there's a little of both worlds. Their system for eliminating the noon conference and having a bimonthly didactic afternoon gels with my learning style too. And for Mayo, I got the sense that the PD was thinking about reducing 3rd year nursery experience to make room for electives. It also seems like their nurseries get a lot of genetic cases (it is mayo after all) so I can see how it would be a valuable learning experience vs the nursery at my school for instance, where only interns rotate there since it is just a paper pushing service with militant lactation consultants. Mayo residents also seem to get a lot of opportunities for research, which is something I would like to start building into my CV. UM seems to be more of a high volume hospital so probably less time outside of electives, but they seem to have a more robust advocacy experiences. I could go on, but I really can't decide between the two (hopefully it won't be a moot point come match day where each hospital decided not to rank me)
Both places seem great to live, but clearly Minneapolis is a more bustling cosmopolitan area with rich diversity of patients. I imagine Rochester would be a bit cheaper though for that reason. Before anyone comments, I love the cold - i am very white
Both places seem great to live, but clearly Minneapolis is a more bustling cosmopolitan area with rich diversity of patients. I imagine Rochester would be a bit cheaper though for that reason. Before anyone comments, I love the cold - i am very white