- Joined
- May 29, 2004
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
So, here's my situation:
I have a full offer at Baylor COM, and I have been waitlisted for the program at Duke (accepted to the med school), but those are my only options at this point. Can anyone comment on whether he or she thinks a Duke education/reputation (even if it is just the MD) would be more valuable to me as a potential researcher than that of a Baylor MD/PhD?
Some people seem to think that my opportunities after med school (in terms of residency placement, winning grants, etc.) coming out of Duke will be much better than at Baylor. My rather uninformed opinion, however, is that the reputation of a school (when it is good) might serve to band-aid over the mediocrity of individual students, but real talent and dedication in a student will shine through no matter which school he or she attends. That being said, I do believe there is value in attending a high power school like Duke (which is not to say that Baylor is not good), not least of which would be the kind of classmates I would have, and the unique educational opportunities/clinical experiences I might enjoy during med school
itself and beyond.
Since I'm only wait-listed to Duke's program, however, my only option there is to accept the MD offer and apply to the MD/PhD again, internally. I personally don't think the odds of being admitted to the MD/PhD at Duke as a second cycle candidate are high enough, though; apparently, availability of slots for internal candidates is dependent on sort of 'left-over' funds, so it's highly variable from year to year. Therefore I think I'd be better off accepting what I know I have at Baylor, regardless of any deliberations about which one is better. In terms of research interests, mine are varied enough and still sufficiently unfocused that I see comparably interesting avenues to pursue at either school, though perhaps more personally relevant ones at Baylor.
Some people have suggested that I ought to consider giving up on the idea of a combined program, just go to the better school and plan to do research anyways with an MD or just do a postdoctoral fellowship after residency, etc. if I can't get into the MD/PhD program from within -- I'm particularly dismissive of this plan, though, because I'm pretty certain I want the formal training and research experiences of real graduate study, and I'd rather not take on more debt than I have to.
Any advice?
For background, I'm originally from Texas and went to undergrad in Houston, but I'm trying not to let that guide my hand. Currently, I'm working as a post-bacc IRTA at the NIAID.
Thanks for your help, people!
I have a full offer at Baylor COM, and I have been waitlisted for the program at Duke (accepted to the med school), but those are my only options at this point. Can anyone comment on whether he or she thinks a Duke education/reputation (even if it is just the MD) would be more valuable to me as a potential researcher than that of a Baylor MD/PhD?
Some people seem to think that my opportunities after med school (in terms of residency placement, winning grants, etc.) coming out of Duke will be much better than at Baylor. My rather uninformed opinion, however, is that the reputation of a school (when it is good) might serve to band-aid over the mediocrity of individual students, but real talent and dedication in a student will shine through no matter which school he or she attends. That being said, I do believe there is value in attending a high power school like Duke (which is not to say that Baylor is not good), not least of which would be the kind of classmates I would have, and the unique educational opportunities/clinical experiences I might enjoy during med school
itself and beyond.
Since I'm only wait-listed to Duke's program, however, my only option there is to accept the MD offer and apply to the MD/PhD again, internally. I personally don't think the odds of being admitted to the MD/PhD at Duke as a second cycle candidate are high enough, though; apparently, availability of slots for internal candidates is dependent on sort of 'left-over' funds, so it's highly variable from year to year. Therefore I think I'd be better off accepting what I know I have at Baylor, regardless of any deliberations about which one is better. In terms of research interests, mine are varied enough and still sufficiently unfocused that I see comparably interesting avenues to pursue at either school, though perhaps more personally relevant ones at Baylor.
Some people have suggested that I ought to consider giving up on the idea of a combined program, just go to the better school and plan to do research anyways with an MD or just do a postdoctoral fellowship after residency, etc. if I can't get into the MD/PhD program from within -- I'm particularly dismissive of this plan, though, because I'm pretty certain I want the formal training and research experiences of real graduate study, and I'd rather not take on more debt than I have to.
Any advice?
For background, I'm originally from Texas and went to undergrad in Houston, but I'm trying not to let that guide my hand. Currently, I'm working as a post-bacc IRTA at the NIAID.
Thanks for your help, people!