Med School Rank List - Residency Directors?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

americanm00se

Full Member
5+ Year Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2017
Messages
45
Reaction score
29
I think I saw somewhere on the forums that the US News rankings aren't necessarily how residency directors view the applicants coming from specific schools, with an example that NYU was pretty low on there.

Where can someone find the rankings of medical schools in the eyes of residency directors?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Do you have a Compass login (the paid subscription)? If so I can direct you to see the exact actual values. If you just want the list of top few dozen names:

Harvard, Hopkins, UCSF
Stanford, Penn
WashU, Duke, Columbia
Michigan
Cornell, UCLA, U of Wash, Vandy
Northwestern, Yale
Baylor, Emory, U Chicago, Pitt
Mayo
UTSW, UVA
NYU, Oregon, UCSD, UNC
Brown, Case Western, Dartmouth, Gtown, Sinai, Rochester, USC, U of Wisconsin
Indiana, Tufts, Colorado, Iowa, U of Minnesota
Boston U, Ohio State, U of Alabama, Wake Forest, U of Utah
Miami, Einstein

There is also a peer score where it was other med schools rating instead of PDs:

Harvard, Hopkins, UCSF
Stanford
WashU
Penn
Columbia, Duke, Michigan, U of Wash, Yale
Vandy
Cornell, UCLA, U Chicago
Northwestern, UNC, Pitt, UTSW
Emory, UCSD
Mayo
Baylor, NYU, Colorado, Iowa, Wisconsin
Sinai, Oregon, Alabama, UVA
Case Western, Dartmouth, Minnesota, Rochester
Brown, Indiana, Ohio State, USC

You do see some big departures from Research Rank, like how relatively lower NYU is by reputation (still very solid of course!)
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I would like to reiterate that none of this really makes any difference. If you go to a well-known school you go to a well-known school. If you go to a less-well-known school, then that's that.
Don't a huge chunk (majority even?) of surveyed PDs in some competitive specialties identify "graduate of a well known medical school" as a factor they give weight? Pretty certain I saw that in the match report dataset. Obvs not as important as step 1, clinical grades, letters etc, but not totally irrelevant !
 
Don't a huge chunk (majority even?) of surveyed PDs in some competitive specialties identify "graduate of a well known medical school" as a factor they give weight? Pretty certain I saw that in the match report dataset. Obvs not as important as step 1, clinical grades, letters etc, but not totally irrelevant !

Sure but what I'm saying is that no one is going to be like "oh you went to NYU sounds like your school sucks" just because it's lower than its peer schools in this ranking system
 
Thank you! That list is what I was interested in!

What exactly is a Compass login?
 
Sure but what I'm saying is that no one is going to be like "oh you went to NYU sounds like your school sucks" just because it's lower than its peer schools in this ranking system
Oh I gotcha. Yeah I just thought it was interesting to note that NYU's impressiveness to peers and residencies isn't quite at the level that the research rank would suggest. But I doubt anyone ever gets turned down for a res interview because they "only" went to a place like NYU or Baylor or UCSD. These are all phenomenal


What exactly is a Compass login?
It's the US News paid subscription. Paying something like $25 gets you a year of access to a bunch of specific stats like the number of people accepted to each medical school, residency and peer scores, GPAs and MCATs (this part redundant if you have MSAR)
 
Last edited:
Oh I gotcha. Yeah I just thought it was interesting to note that NYU's impressiveness to peers and residencies isn't quite at the level that the research rank would suggest. But I doubt anyone ever gets turned down for a res interview because they "only" went to a place like NYU or Baylor or UCSD. These are all phenomenal

This isn't too surprising, given NYU's astronomical rise in the US News research rankings over the past 10 years. Even if the quality of its students and graduates improved substantially in the last 10 years, its reputation among residency directors probably would have a lag phase as these graduates go on to make a name for themselves and the school.
 
Don't a huge chunk (majority even?) of surveyed PDs in some competitive specialties identify "graduate of a well known medical school" as a factor they give weight? Pretty certain I saw that in the match report dataset. Obvs not as important as step 1, clinical grades, letters etc, but not totally irrelevant !
What does that mean though? Well known on the region? In the state ? In the nation? Well known because they accepted alum from that school in previous years ? Well known because the state has a great basketball team?
 
What does that mean though? Well known on the region? In the state ? In the nation? Well known because they accepted alum from that school in previous years ? Well known because the state has a great basketball team?
The US News survey is at least a little more explicit, saying that the rating is on a 1-5 scale with 1 "marginal" and 5 "outstanding" instead of asking if you know of the school.

And it's def a sort of fuzzy qualitative effect, but surely seeing on someone's app Caltech college -> Stanford MD gives you a different impression than a CalState -> Loma Linda, and not just that you expect them to love Jesus
 
The US News survey is at least a little more explicit, saying that the rating is on a 1-5 scale with 1 "marginal" and 5 "outstanding" instead of asking if you know of the school.

And it's def a sort of fuzzy qualitative effect, but surely seeing on someone's app Caltech college -> Stanford MD gives you a different impression than a CalState -> Loma Linda, and not just that you expect them to love Jesus
I am guessing almost no one cares what undergrad you went to. Medical school quality once again gives the qualitative assessment that falls into the "well known" problem. The productivity in medical school ,grades, STEPS and letters are probably what really matter.
 
Do you have a Compass login (the paid subscription)? If so I can direct you to see the exact actual values. If you just want the list of top few dozen names:

Harvard, Hopkins, UCSF
Stanford, Penn
WashU, Duke, Columbia
Michigan
Cornell, UCLA, U of Wash, Vandy
Northwestern, Yale
Baylor, Emory, U Chicago, Pitt
Mayo
UTSW, UVA
NYU, Oregon, UCSD, UNC
Brown, Case Western, Dartmouth, Gtown, Sinai, Rochester, USC, U of Wisconsin
Indiana, Tufts, Colorado, Iowa, U of Minnesota
Boston U, Ohio State, U of Alabama, Wake Forest, U of Utah
Miami, Einstein

There is also a peer score where it was other med schools rating instead of PDs:

Harvard, Hopkins, UCSF
Stanford
WashU
Penn
Columbia, Duke, Michigan, U of Wash, Yale
Vandy
Cornell, UCLA, U Chicago
Northwestern, UNC, Pitt, UTSW
Emory, UCSD
Mayo
Baylor, NYU, Colorado, Iowa, Wisconsin
Sinai, Oregon, Alabama, UVA
Case Western, Dartmouth, Minnesota, Rochester
Brown, Indiana, Ohio State, USC

You do see some big departures from Research Rank, like how relatively lower NYU is by reputation (still very solid of course!)


Hmm does this mean it would be more worthwhile to go to Gtown or Ohio rather than a state school? I'm still trying to decide if the prestige would be worth the cost.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Hmm does this mean it would be more worthwhile to go to Gtown or Ohio rather than a state school? I'm still trying to decide if the prestige would be worth the cost.
Extremely, extremely unlikely. What are the pricetags were talking about?
 
Just for fun, here is a chart from 2014:

https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/residency-director-score.1064916/
rzPYDl9.gif
 
Harvard, Hopkins, UCSF
Stanford, Penn
WashU, Duke, Columbia
Michigan
Cornell, UCLA, U of Wash, Vandy
Northwestern, Yale
Baylor, Emory, U Chicago, Pitt
Mayo
UTSW, UVA
NYU, Oregon, UCSD, UNC
Brown, Case Western, Dartmouth, Gtown, Sinai, Rochester, USC, U of Wisconsin
Indiana, Tufts, Colorado, Iowa, U of Minnesota
Boston U, Ohio State, U of Alabama, Wake Forest, U of Utah
Miami, Einstein

Very interesting, thanks for this. Surprised to see Pritzker so (relatively) low; I always thought of it as parallel with WashU/Duke/Columbia type schools but it looks like that's not the case. US News bias I guess? I wonder what causes US News to overrate Pritzker/Yale relative to PD scores.
 
What does that mean though? Well known on the region? In the state ? In the nation? Well known because they accepted alum from that school in previous years ? Well known because the state has a great basketball team?

it isnt defined by the survey and varies by specialty. see survey results in link

http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/NRMP-2016-Program-Director-Survey.pdf

All Specialties: 59% consider it a complete non-factor when ranking applicants

Anesthesia: 67% consider it a complete non-factor when ranking
Child Neurology: 44%
Dermatology: 70%
EM: 59%
FM: 63%
IM: 53%
Neurosurgery: 57%

etc.

Long story short, where you go to school matters when it comes to opportunities, exposure and networking. But, when it comes to landing a particular residency, where you go to school matters little. For the vast majority of applicants it matters zero. It just isn't a part of the standard calculation of whether or not a program wants an applicant. For a handful of applicants every year, it probably has some minimal impact, most likely in the getting more interviews stage.
 
Very interesting, thanks for this. Surprised to see Pritzker so (relatively) low; I always thought of it as parallel with WashU/Duke/Columbia type schools but it looks like that's not the case. US News bias I guess? I wonder what causes US News to overrate Pritzker/Yale relative to PD scores.
The US News ranks are explicitly Research ranks and factor NIH funding and funding per capita among faculty in very heavily. That's probably why some schools have big mismatch.
 
All Specialties: 59% consider it a complete non-factor when ranking applicants

Anesthesia: 67% consider it a complete non-factor when ranking
Child Neurology: 44%
Dermatology: 70%
EM: 59%
FM: 63%
IM: 53%
Neurosurgery: 57%

etc.

Long story short, where you go to school matters when it comes to opportunities, exposure and networking. But, when it comes to landing a particular residency, where you go to school matters little. For the vast majority of applicants it matters zero. It just isn't a part of the standard calculation of whether or not a program wants an applicant. For a handful of applicants every year, it probably has some minimal impact, most likely in the getting more interviews stage.
By comparison couldn't you make statements like "56% of PDs consider research a complete non-factor" ? That would be a pretty misleading thing to say though when there is nuance about types of residencies, with community vs academic or the specialty in question having some very different views.

Can we really say for certain it's not similar to college reputation in MD admissions, where it doesn't matter to a huge chunk but then is important for the subset that does care?
 
I think for ~170k (not even accounting for interest) it would be a no brainer for me, unless I hated the no name for valid reasons outside of reputation
Yeah the amount is staggering. What if I was very interested in ortho/neurosurg though? Would you still recommend state school?
 
Well, what state school? But still I think I'd be going state and not looking back.
UT Medical Branch Galveston.

Also, what do you think about if instead of Case Western, it was Washington University's 60k a year? (a top 10)
 
To follow up, the only people who take US Snooze and Worst Report seriously are pre-meds and medical school Deans.

The US News ranks are explicitly Research ranks and factor NIH funding and funding per capita among faculty in very heavily. That's probably why some schools have big mismatch.
 
UT Medical Branch Galveston.

Also, what do you think about if instead of Case Western, it was Washington University's 60k a year? (a top 10)
It's pretty rare for anyone to have to actually pay that rate at WashU from what I understand. Their median indebtedness among those that must borrow is ~90k, lowest anywhere except for Mayo I believe, and they offer a 50% scholarship - 50% loan package for all demonstrated need. If you do know you'd actually be paying sticker prices though, I'd still struggle to justify picking WashU. If you're the type of person to get into Top 10s I think you can get a good step score and build a good app from Galveston.

Then again, if you're from a family expected to pay sticker to WashU your parents might view ~170k as a lot less important than their kid getting to go where they want for the next four years
 
I interpreted "well-known" to be a place that the PD is familiar with. NYU is a well known name in that pretty much everyone knows the school, but if you are applying to a west coast program that has never seen an applicant from NYU and the PD has never heard of the people your LOR's come from, its not really "well-known" to that program specifically.
 
Top