Methamphetamine Cravings Persist, Remain Intense, Well Into Abstinence

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Therapist4Chnge

Neuropsych Ninja
Moderator Emeritus
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
22,743
Reaction score
5,151
This may be of particular interest for anyone who works with addictions. All of the bolding is mine.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy A. Melville
December 14, 2009 (Los Angeles, California) — Long after most of the psychological and physical symptoms of methamphetamine withdrawal have resolved, a significant proportion of previously addicted individuals who have achieved abstinence continue to experience intense cravings for the drug, according to a study presented here at the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry 20th Annual Meeting & Symposium. This finding, researchers say, likely represents a major challenge to permanently breaking the cycle of addiction.

A study conducted by investigators at the University of California, Los Angeles, showed that although average levels of craving and psychopathology decreased for all methamphetamine-dependent subjects after 2 weeks of abstinence, up to 30% of these individuals continued to experience significant levels of craving, depressive symptoms, and/or psychotic symptoms after 5 weeks. "We thought it was interesting that subjects were still having relatively high levels of cravings, even after having been clean for 5 weeks in a hospital ward and completely isolated from the environment where they used methamphetamine," lead author Todd Zorick, MD, PhD, told Medscape Psychiatry.

Growing Problem
According to the investigators, methamphetamine use is increasing worldwide and has reached epidemic levels in the western United States, including California. Currently, there are no medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat stimulant dependence, and current psychosocial treatment modalities have limited effectiveness, the investigators note.

To better understand factors that may lead to relapse and gain insight into the physical, emotional, psychiatric, and psychophysiological time course of symptoms experienced by these individuals during abstinence, the investigators recruited 56 methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.

All subjects met criteria for methamphetamine dependence, were not dependent on other substances, aside from nicotine, and were confirmed via urine testing to be active users. All subjects were also prescreened for the absence of comorbid medical or psychiatric disease to evaluate "pure" methamphetamine addicts. Study participants were housed in an inpatient clinical research center for 5 weeks and underwent daily urine testing to confirm abstinence and were monitored for withdrawal symptoms.

Decreased Psychopathology
Methamphetamine-dependent subjects had high levels of depressive, mood, and psychotic symptoms before abstaining from the drug but had significant decreases in their levels of psychopathology by the end of the first week of abstinence. Subjects' withdrawal symptoms generally resolved within 2 to 6 days, were fairly mild, and included red/itchy eyes, poor memory, lack of energy, lack of motivation, anger, and irritability. Although many participants experienced a significant decrease in cravings after 2 weeks, up to one-third continued to experience cravings or depressive and/or psychotic symptoms for up to 5 weeks.

Dr. Zorick emphasized that the fact that the subjects had no psychiatric comorbidities unrelated to methamphetamine use represented an important study limitation. However, he said that the evaluation of "pure" methamphetamine addicts provides a clearer understanding of the effects methamphetamine-dependent users experience in abstinence. The researchers are continuing to analyze the data. He told Medscape Psychiatry that final figures are not yet available.

Treatment for such patients is particularly challenging without any existing FDA-approved drug to address cravings, and cognitive behavioral therapy takes time. "Cognitive behavioral therapy is uneven in its applicability for these patients," Dr. Zorick said. "It can work to some extent, but it requires a lot of time and multiple sessions and may not be available for everyone."

Findings Not Surprising
According to Peter Martin, MD, professor of psychiatry and pharmacology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, methamphetamine-dependent patients often have additional psychiatric comorbidities, and addressing those can sometimes help addiction treatment. "A lot of these cravings can be helped first by determining whether there are other psychiatric diagnoses and appropriately treating those," he told Medscape Psychiatry. "If there are no diagnoses and it's just purely methamphetamine addiction, then there are opportunities to treat the impulsivity that go along with the use of the methamphetamine, with some people using mood stabilizers, for instance."

Dr. Martin, who authored Healing Addiction: An Integrated Pharmacopsychosocial Approach to Treatment, describes a multifactorial approach. "All addictive disorders are biopsychosocial illnesses, with biological, psychological, and social components, and with a careful assessment of methamphetamine-dependent patients, one can put together a strategy with pharmacologic, psychological, and social components," he said. Dr. Martin noted that the study's findings of cravings extending 5 weeks into methamphetamine abstinence were not surprising. "It is nice to have this demonstrated in a meticulous clinical study, but it is not surprising to me at all. The most important thing to understand — going beyond methamphetamine — is we need to think of addictions as lifelong disorders," he said.

"The currency of addiction is learning and memory, and once you've had an experience, that experience has its traces in the neural pathways of the brain, so the addict has learned this experience, and of course if it was highly pleasurable and rewarding, it's not surprising that memories leave these traces in the brain." The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Zorick and Dr. Martin have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Animal models suggest that addiction appears to cause permanent changes to the brain's reward systems and other pathways, making the animals forever susceptible to addiction. I don't remember exactly the studies I've read but they mostly dealt with mice, meth and heroin.
 
Yikes, but yeah, not surprising. Meth is a terrible drug.
 
Animal models suggest that addiction appears to cause permanent changes to the brain's reward systems and other pathways, making the animals forever susceptible to addiction. I don't remember exactly the studies I've read but they mostly dealt with mice, meth and heroin.

The Pleasure Pathways are definitely at work, though there is some medication available to essentially block these, though they come with their own issues.

Btw, this article came from a MedScape Medical News e-mail: Medscape Medical News
 
I guess maybe if you have a good dental plan 😉
 
Findings aren't surprising at all...I'd actually be surprised if they found an addictive drug that cravings DID subside within a short time-frame of quitting. There's plenty of research showing they persist for nicotine, alcohol and cocaine. Probably for other drugs as well that I don't know the literature on as well. Cue-elicited craving can happen years down the line, and seem to operate differently from tonic craving.
 
Findings aren't surprising at all...I'd actually be surprised if they found an addictive drug that cravings DID subside within a short time-frame of quitting. There's plenty of research showing they persist for nicotine, alcohol and cocaine. Probably for other drugs as well that I don't know the literature on as well. Cue-elicited craving can happen years down the line, and seem to operate differently from tonic craving.

This is a constant issue in smoking cessation. I work with people who have quit for months/years, only to fall back into smoking after experiencing a cue-elicited craving.
 
This is a constant issue in smoking cessation. I work with people who have quit for months/years, only to fall back into smoking after experiencing a cue-elicited craving.

Yet the literature has shown little relationship between cue-elicited craving and relapse. It's a problem in the craving literature, because withdrawal-induced craving predicts use, but cue-induced craving really doesn't, at least as has been measured and reported thusfar.
 
All drug use can be viewed as a behavior which accelerates aging/oxidative damage/destruction of the pathways affected. Generally the more intense/addictive the drug, the more damage occurs. The addiction itself can be looked at as a side effect of the damage.

The more damaging/addictive the drug, the less is the chance that the bodies natural anabolic repair process will be strong enough to counter the damage, by replacing/repairing the damaged anatomy. Remember that the aging process itself is also at work, and people don't recover the gradually lost brain function that comes with age, let alone due to accelerated degradation from abuse. However, younger people have a greater chance at recovery due to their greater capacity for anabolic repair. However, it seems that a drug like Meth can cause irreperable damage to even a young persons brain.
 
I need to send this to a friend of mine. We got into the most ridiculous argument on Facebook the other day about what he referred to as "chemical elitism" - that is, having an attitude that some drugs are safer/better than others.

(A little background - he got busted for interstate drug sales and spent 10 years in Federal prison, where he earned his college degree. Once he got out, he went to work/intern for Drug Policy Alliance and is now in law school.)

Well, because he is arguing for the reform of drug laws, he took the extreme position against me that the reason everyone's addicted to meth is because it's illegal, and because it's illegal people are "forced" to make it in unsafe, unsanitary ways. When I was trying to make the point that meth is unsafe, period, he started arguing that Big Pharma is just as bad because they make Ritalin, and when I started pointing him in the direction of studies like the one posted here, he said that "abuse experts" and "addiction research" is all anti-drug bulls**t and that researchers are just trying to get federal funding for their work.

What blew me away was that when I pointed out that I see the fallout of meth addiction EVERY DAY in my work, and the long-term to permanent damage to the brain, he said I was wrong and that it wasn't meth, it was polydrug use and I could not prove that meth was at fault for the chronic anxiety, paranoia, motor tics, etc. that I see on a daily basis. Apparently the neuropsych research I read on this is all political, anti-drug fascism and people should be allowed to destroy their lives, and endanger the rest of us, all they want with meth.

Gah!
 
Top