Minority report

[Freud’sMommy]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Using just face pictures, criminality was predicted at 97% accuracy.

Seems like physiognomists were onto something!

With such high accuracy, should this sort of information complement forensic evals?

 

[psych.meout]

 

[Freud’sMommy]

So? Perhaps read why it was retracted. Nothing to do with the methodology.

 

[R. Matey]

I mean, they essentially cherry picked a restricted range of facial images so I think there are some real questions about ecological validity of a tool like this.

 

[WisNeuro]

I mean, they essentially cherry picked a restricted range of facial images so I think there are some real questions about ecological validity of a tool like this.

Yeah, seems more like it's just good at identifying mugshots.

 

[deleted1129370]

I loved the movie...

 

[Freud’sMommy]

Yes, although they attempted to standardize the images across data sources, it would’ve been better if they used same source images and/or validated on an independent dataset, such as my tinder matches.

 

[summerbabe]

Yes, although they attempted to standardize the images across data sources, it would’ve been better if they used same source images and/or validated on an independent dataset, such as my tinder matches.

Plot twist: it's one and the same jk

 

[psych.meout]

So? Perhaps read why it was retracted. Nothing to do with the methodology.

View attachment 373008

Yeah, the research is bad for lots of reasons, this is just the most egregious one.