- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 49
- Reaction score
- 1
"Birth control is a controlled substance"
😕

😕

"Birth control is a controlled substance"
😕
![]()
Nice. I want Yaz to be a C-II.
"Birth control is a controlled substance"
😕
![]()
Yeah, I tried to defend her statement, but no, I can't. I mean, to most people when they hear the phrase 'controlled substance', they think of Valium, Adderall, or Xanax. I doubt anyone thinks Yaz, NuvaRing, or Mirena is a controlled substance. But on the up side, she's really pretty.
she was hot tho.
it's called a beauty paegant for a reason. 😀
*sighs* Yeah, but there are some intelligent women who compete and technically it's a scholarship competition. 🙄 But usually the smarter women are ruled out in the beginning... Maybe due to less poise and confidence, but apparently this one, Miss Michigan, sort of fell during the pageant, so...![]()
Some context w/ Miss Michigan's reply would be useful. Because to an average Joe, needing a prescription = controlled... in the strictest sense of the word, it is controlled, as compared to condoms which are not.
OMG, I chucked a throw pillow at the TV when I heard that. She would be really surprised to find out it would be in the same class as cocaine, etc. No matter how pretty she is, she is still a complete *****.
A smarter, though somewhat dumbed-down audience appropriate answer would have been: Eliminate the double standards. If health insurance covers Viagra (which is more costly than most generic birth control) then they should cover birth control because pregnancy and children are REALLY expensive. And there would be less teen moms dropping out of high school and instead going on to pursue education and careers which would advance the female gender. yay.
Was this part of the talent competition for Miss Michigan? I hope not. http://www.tmz.com/2010/05/17/miss-usa-2010-rima-fakih-miss-michigan-pole-dancing-stripping/ - Miss USA 2010 -- Champion Pole Dancer
A smarter, though somewhat dumbed-down audience appropriate answer would have been: Eliminate the double standards. If health insurance covers Viagra (which is more costly than most generic birth control) then they should cover birth control because pregnancy and children are REALLY expensive. .
Jesus...no wonder the Arabs make their women cover up their entire bodies. If they are all as hot as Miss Michigan, we'd steal all of their women...
I don't see a double standard ... Viagra is correcting a dysfunction of the body -- birth control does not correct a dysfunction (if used for actual birth control).
I'd say make it OTC, but there are so many hormonal involvements with any type of birth control that at least an offer of counseling really is essential.
It's preventative medicine. In fact, if someone would have serious complications from a pregnancy, you could even consider it to be preventing a medical condition. Sure, there are other ways to prevent pregnancy, but you could also lower cholesterol by going vegan and statins are still covered. 🙂 QUOTE]
Agreed. However, my point was the two medications are very different and it's hard to say there is a double standard when the two medications are used for very different reasons. I suspect some of the more paranoid women believe that there is a double standard because society doesn't care about them as much as they care about men. I do not believe those are the movtivations for not covering BC.
Regardless, it's a lot easier to pay for BC than it is for Viagra or Cialis, insurance or no.