Right on. I don't think anyone sees a problem with earning more by working more or more efficiently.
It was indeed a silly post. It would be called joking...
...Kind of like how your hyperbole is also a joke.
"No money compared to most other fields"?
What is that? What does that even mean "no money"? 25k less? 50k? 100k? 500k?
MGMA has the 90th% for all hospitalist varieties, IM, Peds, etc around 300k.
You want to bet those folks in that 90th% for their field aren't "hustling" too?
Hell, how many hours per week do you think the average general surgeon puts in? More than 50... their mean is around 330k...BUT if YOU were magically a general surgeon working 60 hours, your efficiency would put you at 600k+...because you are special and those other general surgeons are slackers not worrying about efficiency?
Let me guess, MGMA is way off and the average general surgeon working 50 hours per week already pulls in 500k per year...Right?
Do you know the average hours put in by the different specialties? Oh yea, that's right you claim Derm makes ~1M working 40 hrs/week. IM makes 600k working 60 hours. Neurosurgeons make multi-M working 60 hours. It is ridiculous.
You often make ridiculous claims. You often have for years now.
Lies, bad recommendations, and hyperbole: the go-to trifecta.
EDIT: Not always the case. Sometimes give good input, maybe even solid advice. "But..."