MS 1 Books - Advice

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

JMJ

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2001
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I have accumulated a list of books helpful to MS1's. The list is based on advice given by a couple of our DO counterparts who happen to be my close friends. In your opinion, please add or delete from the following list:

First Aid for Step 1
Clinical Microbiology Made Ridiculously Simple
Netters Atlas of Human Anatomy
OMT Review (Savarese ? green book only)
Gross Anatomy (Board Review Series)
Clinically Oriented Anatomy

I was told to become familiar with the board material as I work through my first year. The review books were suggested to help me do so. Any thoughts?

The Anatomy books... kinda' confusing. Which is better?

Members don't see this ad.
 
The anatomy books each serve a different purpose:
Netter is an atlas
BRS Anatomy is a review book
Clinically Oriented Anatomy is a textbook

I recommend that you have all 3 of them. (they are the ones that I used)

Adding to your list:

Costanzo's Physiology book (especially the stars version)
Lippincott's Biochemistry
High Yield Immunology
 
I also liked Lippincott's Pharmacology. In addition, I would add:

BRS Physiology
BRS Pathology

Both of those books bailed me out a couple of times before a big test.:clap:
 
Members don't see this ad :)
(The opinion of someone who struggled through 3/4 of first year and would do a few things differently)

Netter: Good, especially for cranial nerves. But, in looking at it afterwards, Clemente is excellent in that it is not over-labeled like Netter is (I think Dr. Cross [UNECOM anatomy prof.] likes it better, as did a few of my classmates) and info is very well organized.

BRS Anatomy: didn't think it was too hot, poorly reviewed on Amazon, too much for a review. High-yield anatomy is probably better (or the new "Roadmaps" book) for quick review.

Though it is a bit of heresy, "Essential Clinical Anatomy" by Moore (the baby version) is probably more manageable if you choose to read a text (which you very well may find yourself not doing as dissection and notes usually prove more valuable)

Savarese OMT review: Probably the gold standard OMT review book. And the new volume does have more info in addition to practice tests.

To echo Dr. Mom: STARS "Physiology" by Costanzo is an outstanding book. While Guyton is eminently readable, Costanzo cuts to the chase and is the closest thing to physiology-made- easy. If you want a more in depth book that has almost all the diagrams that the physiology prof's use, Ganong is great (but a longer, denser read) and may be overkill.

Lippincott's Biochem: From what I've heard, I wish I had used it. Unfortunately, much of the homework in biochem (an abominable class [question: has anyone had a good biochem class in med school?]) comes directly from Marks and many test questions from BRS Biochem also by Marks (both of which are overrated in my opinion, but, unfortunately, necessary)

Everybody get's First Aid, but I question the necessity of starting to study for boards in the first year, it's intensive enough. I might add Princeton Review's "Cracking the Boards" if you must.

Some other books:

High-yield Embryology may be useful, but the note service notes for this class will be key (about the only class I found them useful for).

In 2001 Lippincott's came out with an "Illustrated Review of Microbiology". I really like it especially for an easily read and well illustrated review of immunology and a clinically oriented review in the back. Much less dense than Levison & Janowitz Micro review-though that is an excellent review text as well (probably considered the gold standard by most). "Micro Made Ridiculously Simple" is great, but no immuno. Either of the first two may be a better investment than "High yield Immuno".

For Path (another bit of heresy): STARS "Pathology" by Goljan may be helpful (I did not use it then) I was one of the many that gave up on trying to wade through all of Robbins, and went mostly with notes. Goljan, being a distilled text, may have been helpful.

Pharm: Brenner or Katzung (one of the two) are the required books. Most get Brenner. If you do too, know there is a review version which is very good for, well, review (go figure).

Hope this helps. Feel free to email.
 
This is good stuff. Any other suggestions.

thanks,
JJ

BUMP!😎
 
I forgot to mention a Path book I did use frequently my second year: "Concise Pathology" by Parakrama Chandrasoma. I think it is much better organized than Robbins, and while thick, you can read a system section in a day. It lacks the beautiful pictures in Robbins and the last print was 1998, but still a great book.
 
I am second year at UNE.
Here are some books I recommend to you
Definites:
Marks Biochem and Review books
Atlas of the Skull
Moores Anatomy Text
Medical Genetics
Bates for FOD
Grants Dissector
Noteservice!-I am an adamant supporter of noteservice. If you learn all that your professors teach in lecture you will never be in danger of failing
Books that I like that may be good for you as well:
Wheaters Histology(you only need this atlas, and it can serve as your text as well since you Histo prof will give you handouts)
Ganongs physio, Constanzos physio(stars), and Guytons physio(I bought three physio books because I needed the help)
Brenners pharmacology
Jones Strain counterstrain

I bought Anatomy flashcards bought didnt find them that helpful. I suggest photocopying the pages in Moores text that have tables for the different muscles, in these tables it will have the muscles attachments and the muscles motions(learn those tables).
For Path you will probably want to buy Robbins big text. I recommend buying the little review text as well.
Also you will be getting orientation stuff in the mail as well detailing what the rest of the class thought were good books.
You can also email me with any q's you have about books, classes, etc
 
Somethings I learned as I (finally 😳 ) started studying for classes this past semester...

Remember, test questions come from lecturer notes and assigned readings - not from board review books.

However, I would pick up First Aid and use it along side your classes. Purpose: get familiar with the content and with the book itself. It will be the lifeline for board review (w/c IMHO is more signif than grades).

For books to pick up, FA has a student-graded review of board review books in the back. Also, browse the USMLE/COMLEX forum here at SDN for user commentary (there is a bunch - I just went through all 20+ page of them for advice on studying for boards).

My library includes:
-----------------------
Gross: Moore (req'd), BRS, Grant's Atlas, and Netter CD (w/c I was my primary atlas - it has the same pics as book; you can print out the pics; and it didn't stink). Moore will be too heavy for board review (I'm going to re-read the blue sections though) - great for class.

Histo: I had an old atlas hand-me-down. Our instructor gave us great packets so I just needed the pics.

Biochem: I have too many of these - although I have my M.Sc. in Clinical (bio) Chem - so I'm not sure if I count here - besides, I'm the weird med student, I liked biochem... From what I've read, many peeps like Lipponcott's for reference - although some say that is too much for boards...

OMM/OPP: [BTW, what does your school call it? haha]
I have FOM and Savarese (he's alum - I have to support him). Everybody swears by OMT Review for COMLEX I and II - I like to read it because I like OMT... I didn't really help much with classes though. I find it strangely ironic that I had to buy this book at PCOM's bookstore, not mine. Speaking of, did B&N buy-out every osteopathic school's bookstore or just most of them?

Physio:
---------
I went through the year without a book - just instructor notes - and I think I was at a disadvantage becuase of it (some bad instructors taught physio here). I've picked up BRS - although I here Constanza's other Physio (STARR) is da bomb and Gujin's (sp?) work is great. My plan is to pick up Gujin's for boards.

Micro:
-------
Books needed here? From looking at a few, bugs don't change much - only drugs. If you like cartoon's - get Micro Made Ridiculously Simple (MRS) - most peeps swear by that book and FA for boards.

Neuroanat
--------------
I have the MRS book - although I didn't read it (again, I probably should have). High Yield NA is the one most recommended for boards on the forums here.

Remember, board REVIEW books are for REVIEW - not necessarily a good thing to be LEARNING from for the first time. Use them to find the ones you like (and the style you like) for when they really count (COMLEX).


-Amra
MS2, NSUCOM (Gawd, it feels good to type "MS2"!)
 
i just posted a few texts if you are looking to buy some reference books for cheap......it is under the For Sale heading under "CCOM 2007 Books for Sale" thread or you can email me directly at [email protected] and i will tell you if i have them or not (and where you can find them for cheap otherwise!)
 
Check out Fluids, Acid Base and Electrolytes Made Ridiculously Simple by Richard Preston. Its excellent for the nephrology when you have systems in the 2nd year.

Boards and Wards is very high yield for COMLEX.
 
pathophysio for boards and wards? Good just for boards - how play into systems?

TIA!
-A
 
I thought I'd visit this thread again and see what was going on. I'd like to point out a great lesson here:
Ultimately, the best books are a matter of preference and, often, practicality. Ultimately, there are very few books that are an absolute necessity (an anatomy and a histology atlas, the dissector, and the biochem books [only because of the structure of the class]) and books are expensive. You will find the books OR other resources (ex. online) that are necessary for you to learn the material. For example MeaCulpa found noteservice, Wheater's Histology and the Atlas of the Skull useful. I personally never found noteservice useful past embryology (8-13 pages for 1 hour of class to dig out 4 or 5 important points was too much for me. And if you're a slow typer like me, shelling out $40-50 to have someone scribe for you every time your name comes up gets mighty expensive. My class [2005] was fortunate to have a student who offered a better, and less expensive, alternative). Wheater's is a good book, but many people (including me) found Gartner & Hiatt preferable for being more readable and including an overview of the relevant physiology at the beginning of each chapter. And as an example of the practicality issue: The skull atlas is very useful-for about 1 week (the one leading up to the skull quiz at the beginning of the Head & Neck portion of anatomy). 35 bucks for one week's yield...Hmm...might be best to share or borrow. Preference can be an especially big issue with review books. Some of the BRS books are very popular, esp. Physiology and Pathology. But I have a hard time with their bare-bones outline format; so I find myself liking the STARS review books as they are more paragraphical outline format (I need a story, not just the bullets). So does this mean MC is wrong and I'm right? No! Just realize that everyone you will talk to will have a slightly different opinion for what works and what doesn't. So unless someone is paying for your books, relax until the class starts and see what works for you before you rush out and buy what everyone recommended. UNECOM students are truly big-hearted and want to help the newbies in every way possible, but the advice giving can get a little overwhelming (Oh, pity the 2006er that-in a drunken stupor at the beginning-of-the-year booze-cruise-I trapped at the end of the night advising him for 20 minutes on everything from books to the need to exercise until my wife rescued him from me). Hope this helps a little.
 
Top