NIH postbac program

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Zmoney12

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2005
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I know before I have seen people talking about how they had done the IRTA program at the NIH-- if any of you are around, I have a couple questions I would like to get insight from you about if you could let me know

Thanks
 
Zmoney12 said:
I know before I have seen people talking about how they had done the IRTA program at the NIH-- if any of you are around, I have a couple questions I would like to get insight from you about if you could let me know

Thanks

I just finished an IRTA. You can PM me or post here with questions.
 
could you post yor questions here? I'm gonna be starting my IRTA pretty soon and would like to hear the answers.
 
Oooh OOoohOOo I have a question too!!! = ) =)
Is doing IRTA better than just working at a lab on campus full time or getting an MS?? If so, why? I mean I am thinking perhaps about doing IRTA, but cannot decide among IRTA, biotech, or continuing in my undergrad lab for MS degree. Thanks for your help! =)
 
byong_soo said:
Oooh OOoohOOo I have a question too!!! = ) =)
Is doing IRTA better than just working at a lab on campus full time or getting an MS?? If so, why? I mean I am thinking perhaps about doing IRTA, but cannot decide among IRTA, biotech, or continuing in my undergrad lab for MS degree. Thanks for your help! =)


I think IRTA is better than working on campus X. However, if you want to go to school at vandy (for instance), working at vandy for a year would probably be better than doing an IRTA because of the connections you'll make and the familiarity you'll develop with the place.

If you can get an MS in a year that might not be a bad idea. It seems a lot of matriculants have masters' degrees. You may have to essentially repeat coursework, though.

If you go work for industry you'll make a lot more money (I suppose?) which may make up for the slight differences in "prestige" (to adcoms) between programs. On the other hand an industry job might give you some sort of rare insight, or make adcoms perceive you as "special" or "diverse".
 
Well I guess mostly I wanted to hear how those of you who got an IRTA went about it. Did you contact PI's directly, and if so how many, how responsive were they, what did you say to them, etc?

Also, at what point in the year did you apply, and when did you find out you were accepted?

Any other general thoughts/suggestions on getting a position would be helpful, too.

Thanks
 
Both worked well for me. Eventually I ended up placing with one of a couple of PIs that contacted me directly, but all PIs that I contacted myself were receptive (even if there weren't room in their labs). Definitely e-mail a number of people who you're interested in working with.

And yeah, I might be biased but I think an IRTAship is better than an MS, cause I mean, an MS costs money usually, the IRTA pays (a bit), and it exposes you to large institutional research that people love to hear about in interviews. And it's probably better not staying at your own institution just for breadth of exposure.

And DC's fun! (don't live in Bethesda)

Zmoney12 said:
Well I guess mostly I wanted to hear how those of you who got an IRTA went about it. Did you contact PI's directly, and if so how many, how responsive were they, what did you say to them, etc?

Also, at what point in the year did you apply, and when did you find out you were accepted?

Any other general thoughts/suggestions on getting a position would be helpful, too.

Thanks
 
I just finished my IRTA year (and now I'm sitting in the lab where I'm doing my first MSTP rotation; w00t!) I highly recommend doing an IRTA. 1. As opposed to an MS, it pays. 2. It's the NIH. Lots of money, awesome equipement, interesting seminars, nice area near DC/metro accessible, 3. with the right PI, it's the perfect job in terms of missing work for interviews, and 4. the MSTP committees eat it up. I feel that especially for me, coming from a small liberal arts all women's school (not exactly a research powerhouse), having the NIH name put a certain stamp of approval on my research abilities. I sensed more interest in my work at the NIH, even at early interviews when I was only 2 months into the project, than in the 2.5 years thesis project I did at my college. Also, so many people have worked at NIH, so it's really a networking thing. I had tons of interviewers ask me what building I was in, and if such-and-such was the same, and if I knew so-and-so. it's like when you luck out with an alum from your college as an interviewer: instant common ground. Plus, you will meet lots of other NIH people at interviews, which is always fun. Oh, and ditto not living in Bethesda; it's way expensive. Live in DC if you can (I lived with my parents in Southern MD... NOT fun ... but hey, it does only pay like $23,000).
 
Baltimore's cool too if you're into drug abuse research. Aging has several labs in Baltimore as well. I understand it's generally cheaper to live here than it is in DC.
 
Top