Originally posted by apma77
the reason NJMS- Newark has a bad rep is cause the program sucks. The residents are pretty much miserable
I have also read the post from scutwork.com and since this program is close to home and my significant other, I decided to test the validity of the reputation. After the rotation, I have concluded that most CA-3s are reasonably happy with the experience except two people out of eight. As far as the CA-1s and CA -2s are concerned, they do seem pretty gung ho about the program.
... and many have failed their boards in the past few years. This program lost its chair and has had a tough time finding a new one thats decent.
Here are the facts about the former chair. He did not believe in didactics. Rather, he was very adamant on forcing residents to work more hours and just allow them to learn from the experience in his sweat shop. Therefore, it's not surprising that the pass rate was very low in the past few years, and hence the University fired his sorry as*. Dr Davidson, the interim chair, did not agree with this philosophy and now has instituted more didactics. I, for one attended the resident lectures and morning report. I was pleased with what I saw. BUMP In addition, please be advised that program chairs do not grow on trees. In University programs, they have to meet criteria that a few people in the field fulfill. However, NJMS did find a new chair, and Robert Wood, another excellent program, has not at the time.
The surgery dept is extremely maliginant which means anesthesia residents are often abused by surgery.
I cannot comment on the malignancy of the surgery dept, but I have yet to witness this abuse of anesthesiology residents by surgery.
My conclusion: If you have the time and are serious about UMDNJ, I would suggest that you do the rotation and draw your own conclusions. I know that I have.