- Joined
- Jun 22, 2021
- Messages
- 4,923
- Reaction score
- 4,497
Last edited:
It sounds like the resident could distribute the presentations more evenly, though you can’t really stop the sub-I from reading up on all the patientsI deleted the original because it was a bit too specific but basically he told me 5 minutes before rounds started that he saw four of the patients that I prerounded on. When I asked him if we could split them he said no because he was a subi on audition rotation. So basically I looked like an idiot on rounds. I mentioned it to the resident after not to rat on the guy but more because I don’t want it to affect my evals
This is a resident issue. While it does make sense for the sub-I to get patients that allow them to show their ability, the senior resident should divide the patients in a way that allows for a good educational experience for all trainees.I deleted the original because it was a bit too specific but basically he told me 5 minutes before rounds started that he saw four of the patients that I prerounded on. When I asked him if we could split them he said no because he was a subi on audition rotation. So basically I looked like an idiot on rounds. I mentioned it to the resident after not to rat on the guy but more because I don’t want it to affect my evals
Sounds like the residents are busy. Or just enjoying the soap opera.Agree with above, it doesn't make sense to hand off patients from one student to another.
But again, this shouldn't be up to the students to divide patients. What are your residents telling you guys to do?
I still have pics of the blank white board in our work room every time I d/c'd everyone. I was an intern at the time though, so I guess it's different on the other side for med students trying to hustle for a grade/eval.Sounds like the residents are busy. Or just enjoying the soap opera.
Discharging all your patients used to be called “winning the game.” No more?
Yes, sounds like the OP won the game--which is fine. Additionally, @voxveritatisetlucis it's important to remember that a sub-I is supposed to be seeing as many patients as the interns, so it would not make sense for a sub-I to give up their patients to a 3rd year because that means that one of the other interns is going to need to take those patients too and potentially imbalance the service. If you're bored you should ask to start following some of the patients being followed by the other interns.Sounds like the residents are busy. Or just enjoying the soap opera.
Discharging all your patients used to be called “winning the game.” No more?
Agree with above. The same learners should be following patients for continuity sake. Learning + Patient Care>Learning. That said, by your tone I'm imagining you've had a long month and no one's stepped in to arbitrate. Try below.Ya so tomorrow he is insisting on seeing 4 patients while I have 0 since all mine got discharged. He’s insisting it’s because he has been following them he has to keep following them meanwhile I’ll look like an idiot on rounds with nothing to present.
What a clown. Don’t even know why he’s rotating here since he’s a DO and the program doesn’t take DOs
It doesn't sound to me like that's what's been happening. The role of a sub-I and an MS3 are entirely distinct. The sub-I should have a greater deal of responsibility, while the residents should also ensure you have patients to follow. Are there no patients that the actual interns are caring for that you could follow?I just really don’t understand the point of letting a visiting student take priority over home students.