- Joined
- Mar 5, 2015
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 7
What do you think of their disability plan? There are some older threads saying NW is not that great but I believe these threads/articles are outdated and the plan has since changed..
They only have an Own Occupation and Not Engaged definition.
It is funny, I know all of owners of the insurance firms you referenced in your post....our insurance world is small!I was actually in this position last week. Financial agent was saying that NW's "med-occ" definition is better for med/dental... I'm not sure if he was basing that only on the NAME being geared towards our professions, but upon more research, ultimately their 'med-occ' definition appears to actually fall short (not even equal) of the traditional "own-occ/own-specialty" definition given by the big six (guardian, principal, standard, mass mutual, metlife, ameritas)
Also, the NW policy ended up not even being cheaper when compared to the others! Including the same riders, it was more expensive at something like 5-6% (which I believe should be more like 2.5-3.5%). It was like $175/mo for $3000 (didn't get a quote for $5k or $10k).
Related Links:
1) Disability Insurance Options- Guardian or Northwestern Mutual?
2) Doctor Disability Shop | North Western Mutual’s Disability Insurance Product for Doctors
3) Why not Northwestern Mutual physician disability insurance? – Friday Q&A Series
I'll probably be going with doctordisability if not hitting up Scott 😛.
PS while you're here Scott, as a specialty, would an orthodontist be considered at lower risk like radiology or some of the other lower impact specialties? I am a general dentist now, but starting in ortho residency this summer.. I was guessing I would want to look into DI as a resident to be considered for ortho specialty occupation definition rather than as a general dentist? Also to get any 'resident discounts' or is that medical specialties only? Orrrrr would it be more beneficial to look to get it now while I have the income of a GD rather than a resident and thus more to insure? Thx!!
Munks,I was actually in this position last week. Financial agent was saying that NW's "med-occ" definition is better for med/dental... I'm not sure if he was basing that only on the NAME being geared towards our professions, but upon more research, ultimately their 'med-occ' definition appears to actually fall short (not even equal) of the traditional "own-occ/own-specialty" definition given by the big six (guardian, principal, standard, mass mutual, metlife, ameritas)
Also, the NW policy ended up not even being cheaper when compared to the others! Including the same riders, it was more expensive at something like 5-6% (which I believe should be more like 2.5-3.5%). It was like $175/mo for $3000 (didn't get a quote for $5k or $10k).
Related Links:
1) Disability Insurance Options- Guardian or Northwestern Mutual?
2) Doctor Disability Shop | North Western Mutual’s Disability Insurance Product for Doctors
3) Why not Northwestern Mutual physician disability insurance? – Friday Q&A Series
I'll probably be going with doctordisability if not hitting up Scott 😛.
PS while you're here Scott, as a specialty, would an orthodontist be considered at lower risk like radiology or some of the other lower impact specialties? I am a general dentist now, but starting in ortho residency this summer.. I was guessing I would want to look into DI as a resident to be considered for ortho specialty occupation definition rather than as a general dentist? Also to get any 'resident discounts' or is that medical specialties only? Orrrrr would it be more beneficial to look to get it now while I have the income of a GD rather than a resident and thus more to insure? Thx!!
Those are underwriting classifications that the carriers assign each individual specialty. As the number goes up then that means a better risk for the carrier thus a lower premium for the consumer. Munks and I were having a discussion about how each carrier classifies specialties and where one carrier might call a particular specialty a 3, 4, or 5 that does not mean the next carrier would classify the same. In addition, the cost factor for the exact same classification can still have a premium differential across carriers since they set their own pricing. Keep in mind a carrier tries to keep their books balance across genders, occupations, ages, and state of residency so this is simply one of the ways to adjust premiums to be able to either attract or dissuade buyers thus adjusting their book of business.Scott,
I don't get what those abbreviations mean.