D
da8s0859q
Looking to clarify something billing type questions I have and how this affects reimbursement.
Epic with Dragon where I am as well as where I'll be as an attending in July. My reimbursement will be, in part, productivity based on fees billed.
Looking to make sure I'm "doing it right." As is, I try to hit the minimum four HPI elements, have the ROS so as to not downcode an otherwise 99285, same for a PE.
The MDM and final diagnosis list in Epic is what I'm looking to make sure. Aware of tables which talk about complexity of decision-making, studies ordered/reviewed, etc, but trying to make sure I'm not leaving something out.
What habits should I make sure I'm in so as to have an appropriate MDM so as to not be downcoded when a higher chart is appropriate? Does reimbursement change with listing incidental findings, like that low mag, the kidney disease unrelated to ED visit, etc?
Epic with Dragon where I am as well as where I'll be as an attending in July. My reimbursement will be, in part, productivity based on fees billed.
Looking to make sure I'm "doing it right." As is, I try to hit the minimum four HPI elements, have the ROS so as to not downcode an otherwise 99285, same for a PE.
The MDM and final diagnosis list in Epic is what I'm looking to make sure. Aware of tables which talk about complexity of decision-making, studies ordered/reviewed, etc, but trying to make sure I'm not leaving something out.
What habits should I make sure I'm in so as to have an appropriate MDM so as to not be downcoded when a higher chart is appropriate? Does reimbursement change with listing incidental findings, like that low mag, the kidney disease unrelated to ED visit, etc?