- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 1,992
- Reaction score
- 2,159
derm! http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1895673
Yes there are some caveats like they only counted medicare billings, the only counted procedures that had more than 5,000 billings, etc. But out of all the possible medical specialties out there, they bill more often for derm procedures than for all other specialties combined.
This may reflect a an attitude of "follow the money" by midlevel providers. It may also reflect the huge demand by patients for derm services that simply isn't being met by the existing physician dermatologist framework.
The conclusion of the article is also interesting. Instead of pushing for training more dermatologist physicians to meet patient demand, or being grateful that these midlevels take the bread-and-butter cases and leave the complicated cases for physicians, the authors suggest a third approach.
Yes there are some caveats like they only counted medicare billings, the only counted procedures that had more than 5,000 billings, etc. But out of all the possible medical specialties out there, they bill more often for derm procedures than for all other specialties combined.
This may reflect a an attitude of "follow the money" by midlevel providers. It may also reflect the huge demand by patients for derm services that simply isn't being met by the existing physician dermatologist framework.
The conclusion of the article is also interesting. Instead of pushing for training more dermatologist physicians to meet patient demand, or being grateful that these midlevels take the bread-and-butter cases and leave the complicated cases for physicians, the authors suggest a third approach.