Number of New Patient and Follow-up Slots

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
M-T-W-T
Just changed Friday to OR only.
7:30-11 slots
12:30-3:30 slots

10 min base slot. 20 min NP, 20 min RF, SCS or kypho in office at end of day.
No reserved slots, if it takes 2 slots, make sure there is room for both. Nothing worse than a NP in a 10 min slot.
 
M-T-W-T
Just changed Friday to OR only.
7:30-11 slots
12:30-3:30 slots

10 min base slot. 20 min NP, 20 min RF, SCS or kypho in office at end of day.
No reserved slots, if it takes 2 slots, make sure there is room for both. Nothing worse than a NP in a 10 min slot.
Wow 20 min NP slots... even that seems like a crunch... no?
 
Wow 20 min NP slots... even that seems like a crunch... no?
If you tell me neck/back/knees/hips/toes- you get to pick one. If you cannot , you are in the wrong place. Or we can knock down the worst pain and move on from there. It's why I get the most entertaining reviews.
 
If you tell me neck/back/knees/hips/toes- you get to pick one. If you cannot , you are in the wrong place. Or we can knock down the worst pain and move on from there. It's why I get the most entertaining reviews.
so what code are you using to bill those NP slots 99204? You must not be billing many 99205's at all huh?
 
Who bills 99205? That’s like a unicorn in my practice. Either that or I’m just underbilling

Only if 1) send to ED, 2) bill for time (soul sucking) 3) I plan for a surgical procedure (I include intracept in that as I make an incision). Typically 0-2 per week.
 
so what code are you using to bill those NP slots 99204? You must not be billing many 99205's at all huh?
Once a year at most. Not that many do not qualify, but I do not want to take the time to figure it out and then go back and change one thing to make sure it is upcharged a level. Not my style.
 
Never level 5

Clinic 1 to 345

8 new patients then 8 follow ups. Catch up on the dictation during the f/u slots. Pretty much always out by 4
 
Slots 8:00 - 11:30, 1:00 - 4:00. All 15 minutes, new or return. I started 3 years ago with 15 min return, 30 min new, changed to 20 min for all about a year in, and 15 min to all a few weeks ago.

And bill 1-2 99205 a week.
 
Slots 8:00 - 11:30, 1:00 - 4:00. All 15 minutes, new or return. I started 3 years ago with 15 min return, 30 min new, changed to 20 min for all about a year in, and 15 min to all a few weeks ago.

And bill 1-2 99205 a week.
That's pretty efficient. Do you use a scribe or dictate or templates?
 
You’re ortho or you’re pain?

The large majority of ortho pods I work with consistently bill level 5s.

The pain people, like me, do not.
Pain working with ortho. All level 3 and 4
 
M-T-W-T
Just changed Friday to OR only.
7:30-11 slots
12:30-3:30 slots

10 min base slot. 20 min NP, 20 min RF, SCS or kypho in office at end of day.
No reserved slots, if it takes 2 slots, make sure there is room for both. Nothing worse than a NP in a 10 min slot.
How do you document? Dragon? Scribe?
 
Does this mean procedures in the morning? How many days per week are you doing this?
yes.

essentially procedures in the morning and clinic in the pm. with a couple tweaks. i do some EMGs and take early fridays usually
 
so you are saying that if i plan an interventional procedure during an office visit, that qualifies as a level 5? I thought that just made it a level 4.
 
I probably bill one level 5 per month. Typically a patient that I bill on time. It can add up on complex patients. Time reviewing chart, MRI, med management/PDMP review, physical exam and going over MRI with patient as well as time documenting. I think it needs to be 60 minutes? Pretty rare but they do happen. Otherwise most patients are level 3 and 4. I probably under bill but I'd rather have a little less money to avoid fraud/jail.
 
so you are saying that if i plan an interventional procedure during an office visit, that qualifies as a level 5? I thought that just made it a level 4.
Just doing a procedure does not change your e&m code per se.

Don't try to bill a level 5 if seeing patient then doing a trigger point. But an acute radix with myelopathy that you do a tf.....
 
A few per month for me. Mostly patients with myelopathy that made their way to me instead of the surgeon. Also those with mystery 10/10 pain where I have to go through multiple imaging studies, EMG, surgeon’s note, neurologists note, etc.
 
That's pretty efficient. Do you use a scribe or dictate or templates?
No scribe, but I do dictate everything, and have templates set up for most things. Usually 8-10 minutes in the room, then another 4-5 putting in orders and dictating the note. I almost never move on to the next patient without first signing the previous note and closing the encounter. I could maybe get quicker if I had my nurse put in more orders, or used a scribe, but I think I would get too stressed.
 
No scribe, but I do dictate everything, and have templates set up for most things. Usually 8-10 minutes in the room, then another 4-5 putting in orders and dictating the note. I almost never move on to the next patient without first signing the previous note and closing the encounter. I could maybe get quicker if I had my nurse put in more orders, or used a scribe, but I think I would get too stressed.
what EHR is this?
 
Just doing a procedure does not change your e&m code per se.

Don't try to bill a level 5 if seeing patient then doing a trigger point. But an acute radix with myelopathy that you do a tf.....
of course,
i mean if I am requesting auth for things like kypho, scs, TFESI/ILESI,
 
I found what ended up being up lymphoma. Only time I billed a level 5. Almost everything else is a 4. MBB f/u or an injection f/u with controlled pain is a 3. G2211 for almost everybody.
 
I found what ended up being up lymphoma. Only time I billed a level 5. Almost everything else is a 4. MBB f/u or an injection f/u with controlled pain is a 3. G2211 for almost everybody.
Wow. They’ve got you trained. Meanwhile medicare is looking for any way they can to short you a buck or two.
 
of course,
i mean if I am requesting auth for things like kypho, scs, TFESI/ILESI,
If neurosurgeons booking for 3-level fusions, are booking a 99204 for their visits for true major surgeries....you should not (and cannot) be booking a level 5 visit for any of the above based on complexity. Only if you are billing based on time.
 
If neurosurgeons booking for 3-level fusions, are booking a 99204 for their visits for true major surgeries....you should not (and cannot) be booking a level 5 visit for any of the above based on complexity. Only if you are billing based on time.

If neurosurgeon is reviewing an MRI and booking a surgery and is billing 99204 and not 99205, they are billing incorrectly.
 
Wow. They’ve got you trained. Meanwhile medicare is looking for any way they can to short you a buck or two.

I would disagree. I absolutely try to maximize my billing. If I’m doing the work, I’m making sure I get paid every appropriate penny. I’ve reviewed the criteria for 99205/99215 and don’t think I (or almost any doc in almost any specialty) meet those criteria except in a few situations. Perhaps I am wrong. Hell I would love to be wrong! But I don’t think I am. What is your interpretation of how you are meeting level 5 criteria? Has it stood up to actual auditing (internal or external), or has it not been stress tested? I just really don’t think much of what we do (or, again, almost anybody does) is level 5 stuff.
 
If neurosurgeons booking for 3-level fusions, are booking a 99204 for their visits for true major surgeries....you should not (and cannot) be booking a level 5 visit for any of the above based on complexity. Only if you are billing based on time.
so doing trigger points and taking 3 sets of vitals 20 minutes apart is a level 5?

Obviously I’m not doing this but it’s amusing how one can rig this…
 
of course,
i mean if I am requesting auth for things like kypho, scs, TFESI/ILESI,
yes. the type of procedure does increase the medical complexity and you can code often higher levels appropriately so. in particular, the Risk decision making component.

risk decision making.GIF

from Epic.

from the neurosurgical case - 1 or more chronic illness with severe exacerbation, progresson or side effects, with minimal amount or complexity, but high risk is supposedly a 99205....
 
Again, even with that Epic wizard tool you’ll note that you have to check off something from each of the 3 columns. A major surgery in and of itself is not enough to justify 99205/15
 
Again, even with that Epic wizard tool you’ll note that you have to check off something from each of the 3 columns. A major surgery in and of itself is not enough to justify 99205/15

Billing is based off the 2 out of 3 columns. If you hit level 5 in 2 columns, it’s a level 5. Can easily say that something requiring surgery is a “chronic illness with severe exacerbation,” which bumps column 1 into level 5. The majority of spine surgeries could be documented in such a way that you will get a level 5.
 
For G2211, are you all billing that on a follow up visit post INJ if the patient reported adequate relief and is not getting any chronic meds besides PRN muscle relaxants. Next visit is in a 3-6 months for re evaluation if another INJ is needed
 
Never seen an ortho colleague of mine bill higher than 4. Even complex, multilevel spine surgery I’ve never seen a 5.

I don’t know. I see it every day. IMO they are leaving money on the table.
 
If neurosurgeons booking for 3-level fusions, are booking a 99204 for their visits for true major surgeries....you should not (and cannot) be booking a level 5 visit for any of the above based on complexity. Only if you are billing based on time.
Our clinic employs a multimodal model of pain mgmt. we do a comprehensive review of all major pain generators and develop a multimodal plan. To include, PT, pharmacotherapy (both non narcotic and narcotic), adjuvant therapies (TENS, US, Regenerative therapies, Ketamine, Qutenza, etc etc), and of course interventional therapies galore. I think very plausible to bill 99205’s in pain medicine if the complexity and time warrants it, which it often does. In fact almost ALL our new med mgmt visits are 99205’s. Which is justified per above posted guidelines.
 
I would disagree. I absolutely try to maximize my billing. If I’m doing the work, I’m making sure I get paid every appropriate penny. I’ve reviewed the criteria for 99205/99215 and don’t think I (or almost any doc in almost any specialty) meet those criteria except in a few situations. Perhaps I am wrong. Hell I would love to be wrong! But I don’t think I am. What is your interpretation of how you are meeting level 5 criteria? Has it stood up to actual auditing (internal or external), or has it not been stress tested? I just really don’t think much of what we do (or, again, almost anybody does) is level 5 stuff.
Many of our NP visits and almost all new opioid management visits are 99205’s. We have been audited before, twice in fact, since Ive been here, never had an issue with our visit codes.
 
Top