- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Messages
- 2,479
- Reaction score
- 8
Nothing, you can have excellent skills and still be weak overall. For an analogy, look at Tiger Woods and his abilities, now see how he is golfing in the real world. I don't think anyone would call Tiger a bad golfer, but he has some serious issues with his game, it is currently a weak game compared to his peers. Understanding context is part of solving mathematical problems. Hence my comment on her most likely being weak in the math DEPARTMENT.
She made a life/death computation haphazardly and messed up. The dosage was over an adults dosage and she worked in the NICU. She should have known that. Would you prefer I call her incompetent or grossly negligent? That is how her error was probably categorized by both the state and her hospital, based on her sanctions. Would you prefer I say that to honor her memory? I don't fully agree with that, but that is how she probably was judged.
This is a math issue, no argument there right? You yourself have pointed this out. The reason it is a math issue, is that in the context of this problem she did not place enough priority on calculating the dosage correctly. Now the question is whether or not it was likely a pattern. From my exposure, and knowledge I would say that it likely was an issue. Obviously the hospital, and her state board thought so. What makes you think otherwise? Her perfect record? Really? The hospital did not report that, as they said they would not extrapolate, so you are operating on second-hand data. You are also being very naive if you think a perfect record means anything. It just means she did not ever do anything serious enough, to be reported. NO ONE is perfect.
Lastly, posting walls of text with exaggerated formatting to attempt to prove your comment, is not honoring her. You said my educated opinion as a fellow Nurse was asinine and baseless. What exactly are your qualifications to state that?
"Educated opinion" would suggest you're drawing on actual evidence, rather than broadly and blindly claiming that someone is mathematically inept. Sharing a profession with someone doesn't exactly make you telepathically linked. As you said yourself, NO ONE IS PERFECT. Michael Jordan missed shots occasionally, even when he knew they were REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT. That in nowise suggests he was a below-average shooter. The fact is, this nurse DID know she'd overdosed, hence her immediately notifying other staffers. Is she unimpeachable? Hell no. But to blatantly ascribe the whole incident to a lack of concern and/or aptitude on her part is preposterous, and that's exactly what you've done. Your rambling, incoherent attempt to backtrack out of that stance is a fail.