- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I had an appointment with the doctor, and saw him. He did a biopsy, and ordered a series of ultrasounds. He promised to call me back with the results of the biopsy, and told me to call him if he hadn't gotten back to me at a certain time. I did. He'd taken off for vacation, KNEW he was going on vacation when he LIED and told me he'd be calling me, and he had dumped everything on this girl's desk. She told me WITHOUT EVEN ASKING ME that she would be the one reading the biopsy and ultrasound results and she could make a diagnosis and start treatment without him. That's just WRONG. First of all, I did NOT release my medical records to this girl. I did NOT give her permission to read my file or read my test results. She just took over, and it took me FIVE MINUTES of point-blank questioning ("Are you a doctor?") and her hedging to FINALLY get her to admit she wasn't even a doctor!
AND THIS IS A CANCER CARE CENTER!!! Not freaking Bum****, Nowhere Free Clinic!!
It's wrong. Nurse practitioners do NOT belong at a facility where doctors are treating seriously ill people. If someone wants them to take care of their kid's diaper rash, that's their business, but no "nurse-practitioner" should be allowed to be involved with cancer care. Only real doctors should be involved.
I'm completely disgusted. Either be a doctor or be a nurse. This middle-of-the-road half-assed approach is only contributing the watered-down, impersonal, crappy health care in this country. It's dishonest and it's lazy. If a doctor can only see a certain number of patients, he should only take on a certain number of patients. To hire cheap, untrained help so he can pad his case-load and look important is sleazy.
And then, when you research these "nurse-practitioners" on the 'net, you run across blogs and forums for these people where they BRAG about getting their "training" online, or even that they don't REALLY have to collaberate with a doctor, they just have to have a doctor's name on record. One stupid cow was blathering on about how the doctor she was SUPPOSEDLY affiliated with lived several hundred miles away and she'd never even met him, and she could practice on her own as long as there was a name attached to her office. Her patients had NO FREAKING CLUE that this was some wannabe nobody with no training who was diagnosing and prescribing for them without a real doctor supervising her.
It's criminal. It's just so wrong.
AND THIS IS A CANCER CARE CENTER!!! Not freaking Bum****, Nowhere Free Clinic!!
It's wrong. Nurse practitioners do NOT belong at a facility where doctors are treating seriously ill people. If someone wants them to take care of their kid's diaper rash, that's their business, but no "nurse-practitioner" should be allowed to be involved with cancer care. Only real doctors should be involved.
I'm completely disgusted. Either be a doctor or be a nurse. This middle-of-the-road half-assed approach is only contributing the watered-down, impersonal, crappy health care in this country. It's dishonest and it's lazy. If a doctor can only see a certain number of patients, he should only take on a certain number of patients. To hire cheap, untrained help so he can pad his case-load and look important is sleazy.
And then, when you research these "nurse-practitioners" on the 'net, you run across blogs and forums for these people where they BRAG about getting their "training" online, or even that they don't REALLY have to collaberate with a doctor, they just have to have a doctor's name on record. One stupid cow was blathering on about how the doctor she was SUPPOSEDLY affiliated with lived several hundred miles away and she'd never even met him, and she could practice on her own as long as there was a name attached to her office. Her patients had NO FREAKING CLUE that this was some wannabe nobody with no training who was diagnosing and prescribing for them without a real doctor supervising her.
It's criminal. It's just so wrong.