- Joined
- Nov 23, 2008
- Messages
- 420
- Reaction score
- 3
Ok I was taking a CDP Test right now and I got so pissed off at the angle ranking. I have to ask if anyone else is feeling the same way?
You will have the smallest and biggest angles easily, then you are looking at the 2 angles that are 5 degrees apart....One of them is normal looking and the other one is this shady, pixelated piece of crap that even though it is supposed to look smaller than the other angle, because of this "pixel-thickening effect" it is absolutely impossible to discern between them.
I don't remember too much from the first time i took the DAT but were the angles as choppy and fuzzy and nasty looking as some of them are in CDP?
Honestly you think with something this important they could render a higher resolution angle that does not shaft the test takers chance at deciphering an already impossible angle difference. 😡
You will have the smallest and biggest angles easily, then you are looking at the 2 angles that are 5 degrees apart....One of them is normal looking and the other one is this shady, pixelated piece of crap that even though it is supposed to look smaller than the other angle, because of this "pixel-thickening effect" it is absolutely impossible to discern between them.
I don't remember too much from the first time i took the DAT but were the angles as choppy and fuzzy and nasty looking as some of them are in CDP?
Honestly you think with something this important they could render a higher resolution angle that does not shaft the test takers chance at deciphering an already impossible angle difference. 😡