old DAT destroyer

[rsrsrsrsrs]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Hi guys
I was just wondering if using 2010 version of dat destroy is a little too risky?
I've read that things are changing with the DAT and am wondering if I should get the newest version?
thanks

 

[NavyDDS1990]

Get the newest version.
I took my DAT on 6/21/15 using 2014 version since it's been only a year, but 2010 is way too old and alot of things have been added ever since then.

 

[TXftw]

Get the newest version.
I took my DAT on 6/21/15 using 2014 version since it's been only a year, but 2010 is way too old and alot of things have been added ever since then.

Was the 2014 edition of destroyer sufficient? I've gone through pretty much every problem in the 2014 edition and am taking my exam in a couple of days. I assume little, if nothing at all has changed for O chem and Gen chem, but I'm not sure about the biology.

 

[NavyDDS1990]

Was the 2014 edition of destroyer sufficient? I've gone through pretty much every problem in the 2014 edition and am taking my exam in a couple of days. I assume little, if nothing at all has changed for O chem and Gen chem, but I'm not sure about the biology.

I thought 2014 edition was sufficient. It really did cover everything that I needed to know because I read every correct and incorrect answers on the back of this book. I completed the bio section 3 times, GC 5 times, OC 4 times.
Anything that I had trouble memorizing from destroyer, I made flashcards in Quizlet

 

[rsrsrsrsrs]

Get the newest version.
I took my DAT on 6/21/15 using 2014 version since it's been only a year, but 2010 is way too old and alot of things have been added ever since then.

Since I'm thinking about buying bootcamp later, would it better to use the old destroyer books for initial practice and use bootcamp later to get familiar with most "current" study materials?
I already have the book and I'm sure there may be couple questions that have been added but nothing major, enough to completely discard the materials in the old book.
thanks for your input