UC med schools typically have some MPH program associated with them. UCB and UCD have such programs (UCB coupled with UCSF). These programs are normally intended for MD/MPH students so I'm not sure how long it is for doing JUST an MPH.
The application deadline for UC grad schools is around April-May. UCB may be different since they are on the semester system. UCD also has an MPVM program which is the veterinary equivalent to the MPH. There isn't much difference since you take the same statistics and public health classes with the MPH students. In fact, back in the day, some of our physicians graduated med school with an MPVM when UCD didn't have an official MPH program.
soy sauce said:
On a side note, medical schools know that grad courses have a much easier curve (or none at all) compared to undergrad courses, so your grad gpa has little weight in the decisions process. Best of luck making plans for next year.
This actually depends. For one, some of the MPH classes may be med school level classes. Here at UC Davis, our medical statistics course (MPM 402, 403 and 404) are professional schoo level (ie: med school). Graduate school at UC Davis are 200-series classes.
True, undergrad courses are weighted "more", but graduate GPA is taken on a case-by-case basis because (1) it may be 2-4 years since the person did undergrad, (2) the person may have taken med school level classes which are technically included as "graduate GPA",. This is why SMP's work. You take med school level classes, and this improves your chances to get in despite them being counted as graduate GPA. (3) they may have taken undergrad classes as electives during the graduate program, which on their transcript falls under graduate GPA, but under AMCAS, actually falls into post-bacc GPA. The proper statement about grad GPA vs. undergrad GPA is that they are completely different. Apples and oranges. Although we normally say on SDN that undergrad GPA is more weighted, its really due to the fact that you can't compare a person with a PhD with a person who has just a BS. What are you going to do? Compare grad level physical organic chemistry (yes there is such a thing) to an undergrads ochem experience? No way. So hence the case-by-case basis.
To emphasize the "case-by-case" nature of graduate GPA vs. undergrad GPA, you can have someone who didn't even have an undergrad GPA, yet did amazingly well in graduate school. One of our SDN mods was in that situation and they got into med school. In another example, UC Davis School of Medicine (my school), actually gives the applicant an "extra point" on their application score card if they have a graduate GPA of greater than 3.8. The same applies for undergrad grades of 3.7 and above.
Lastly, I wouldn't call graduate level classes having an easier curve. Grad school classes are taught differently and I'm sure fellow SDNers can vouch for the fact that grad school classes can be amazingly easy, or even harder than med school classes. I took med school level and grad school level pharmacology. The grad school one was much harder...due to the experimental nature of the questions. I wouldn't make assumptions unless you did a full graduate level program at a reputable institution. For example, the UC's and pretty much every other university out there boots you out of grad school if you get a B- in any class. You are expected to do well because: (1) this is supposedly what you want to do, and (2) the grad student's are chump change either. All of my grad classes here at UC Davis were on a normal 90, 80, 70 grading scale. I'd challenge any undergrad to take graduate level biomedical engineering, or med school level classes and say that it was easier or graded easier.
😉